SafeSpeed wrote:
A twisty 'B' road with a sensible 40mph speed limit. But there's also a 0.5 mile perfect straight section frequently used safely for overtaking, where 80mph is reasonable in good conditions.
One would hope that a B-road would only be given a 40 mph speed limit due to the level of development along it, not simply because it was twisty. If the half-mile straight had a significant amount of development, then a 40 mph speed limit would be appropriate, if not, then it is long enough for a stand-alone stretch of NSL.
greenv8s wrote:
Is the 85 percentile taken from the speed that drivers would choose if left to their own devices, or when there is already a speed limit in force? The former seems more sensible but I don't see how that would ever be determined on a public road.
It also seems to me that whatever speed this analysis comes up with would probably be the speed at the slowest point along the relevent section of road, and would then be rounded down to the nearest 10 mph, so the resulting limit is certain to be lower than the 85 percentile speed, possibly substantially lower in some situations.
The specific way in which it would be applied is, if a lower speed limit is being considered for a road, that speeds should be measured in free-flowing conditions, and the speed limit should be set at a multiple of 10 no more than 6 mph below the 85th percentile speed.
In most cases, ensuring the speed limit is set above the mean speed would give the same result; the exceptions would tend to be on roads such as mountain passes where the greater skill of the more capable drivers would allow them to achieve a higher speed differential over the mean.