Rigpig wrote:
My view,
Yes, I've given some thought to donating but as yet have not. Why? Well I don't fully agree with certain facets of your argument or your approach, I think this is reasonably obvious.
And if you think this thread is the right and proper way of garnering extra cash, eg shame

you've got another think coming.
Like you Rigpig, I do not share all of Paul's views. I have moved a significant distance from where I started, although being on the paybill of a partnership in the first instance rather predicted my initial positioning on the great camera debate.
Its harder and harder to see how the country is likely to become safer under current road safety policy. The opposite is much more likely. Paul is filling a huge intellectual void created by the necessity of the road safety authorities to hide their heads in the sands of blinkered policy, driven more by the purse strings than genuine good intentions. He needs not only moral but financial support. He's a one man band out there fighting the establishment.
There is no doubt that national road safety policy has to consider the burden on the taxpayer, but it is so off the rails that there is the potential that the net costs may end up greater.
I think it's worth fighting for a sensible alternative. I've said that I don't entirely agree with the safespeed philosophy, but if road safety was
the political hot potato, I'd vote Safespeed every time.
For most of us, there is no such thing as spare cash. My meagre contribution to Safespeed thus far was a proportion of the overtime I earned from dealing with a fatal road traffic collision. It felt appropriate to do that. I hope to be able to do so again sometime soon if Mrs H. would get off my case about home improvements

.
On a more basal level, it's good entertainment. We pit our wits with each other, and have some rather nerdy cranial 'click clack' fun. It costs no more than a meal and a bottle of wine.
(
And it's worth it to see what we write about you non-members in the clubhouse

)