Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Feb 03, 2026 03:40

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 338 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 17  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:11 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 00:32
Posts: 23
Location: London
byny wrote:

--SNIP--

The only reason monitoring your speed is dangerous is if you are over the speed limit.

--SNIP--



I refuse to be dragged into this arguement... There is an internationally accepted method for setting speed limits, I am sure that there will be many references to the "85th percentile rule" on the 'net. There is a difference between regulating your speed, and constantly monitoring it because you're on a 60 foot wide streach of tarmac where the speed limit has been reduced from 70 to 40 and put 3 speed cameras there to cash in on anyone who drifts a little over...

AND, this thread isn't about limits, it's about the inappropriate placement of cameras, such that they are simply a revenue stream.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:15 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:53
Posts: 25
Location: Wales, Newport/Cardiff
matt1133 wrote:

i don't believe I should be looking out for 50 signs as i have mentioned it was a National Limit for years prior.

Cheers,
matt


yes you should be - that's what you learn on your theory test and so If you have forgotten perhaps you should do it again?

_________________
freedom is knowledge of one's necessity


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:53
Posts: 25
Location: Wales, Newport/Cardiff
BlueAdept wrote:
byny wrote:


AND, this thread isn't about limits, it's about the inappropriate placement of cameras, such that they are simply a revenue stream.


I have a great idea for stopping them from becoming a revenue stream.... wanna hear it?























DON'T SPEED! Simple as!

_________________
freedom is knowledge of one's necessity


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 00:32
Posts: 23
Location: London
byny wrote:
Quote:
The problem you clearly fail to understand is that we will be obeying the law at 56 mph


And infact 56 mph is the best speed to travel at for most effective fuel consumption so I am told, so why not drive at between 56 mph and 70mph during your usual life instead of just on the one day?


LOL, you've been rumbled... you don't own a car, do you?... :roll:

Actually, I've done tests using onboad computer diagnostics with my car, and found the most efficient speed... and yes, I do drive at that speed somtimes, if I have nowhere to be.. I enjoy driving, that's why I am an enthusiast...

But Salad and Lentils are very healthy... but somtimes you fancy a burger, or don't have time...

Now... lets get this thread back onto the topic at hand, apprologies for rising to the trolls.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:23 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:53
Posts: 25
Location: Wales, Newport/Cardiff
Jay-450 wrote:
fred wrote:
Fact: 70mph limit on motorways is the law.
Drive within this and you wont get caught and fined, or take the train.
Stop causing disruption to law abiding motorists going about their business in the normal way on Saturday 30th and get on with your lives
Lets hope the police out wit you!



If you have never gone even 1mph over the speed limit, then you are entitled to make a comment like that.


I'm qualified then! :)

hi there.

_________________
freedom is knowledge of one's necessity


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:53
Posts: 25
Location: Wales, Newport/Cardiff
BlueAdept wrote:
byny wrote:
Quote:
The problem you clearly fail to understand is that we will be obeying the law at 56 mph


And infact 56 mph is the best speed to travel at for most effective fuel consumption so I am told, so why not drive at between 56 mph and 70mph during your usual life instead of just on the one day?


LOL, you've been rumbled... you don't own a car, do you?... :roll:

Actually, I've done tests using onboad computer diagnostics with my car, and found the most efficient speed... and yes, I do drive at that speed somtimes, if I have nowhere to be.. I enjoy driving, that's why I am an enthusiast...

But Salad and Lentils are very healthy... but somtimes you fancy a burger, or don't have time...

Now... lets get this thread back onto the topic at hand, apprologies for rising to the trolls.


erm - yes I do own a car :) and I drive within the speed limit, and I take note of signs :)

_________________
freedom is knowledge of one's necessity


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:29 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:56
Posts: 4
I just dont see how that is......

I have an aftermarket ECU in my car that tells me all the telemetry, I get better milliage at 100 than I do at 56!!!

Some cars dont even hit 2000RPM at 100, so its a null point I think.

_________________
Regards
M-Jay
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:53
Posts: 25
Location: Wales, Newport/Cardiff
Quote:
Now... lets get this thread back onto the topic at hand, apprologies for rising to the trolls.

Just to point out - I am not a troll - a Troll is someone who arrives on a board to deliberately post inflammatory comments to upset other users on the boards, I am merely posting an opinion in a debate that I think is a worthwhile debate to be having, and I am also raising points in response to others. I was directed to this site through an unsolicited e-mail(SPAM?) on my works e-mail address and I took that to be an invite to join.

I also eat meat, drive a car and smoke so now you know a little about me perhaps you won't feel the need to be so patronising! :)

cheers [/quote]

_________________
freedom is knowledge of one's necessity


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 09:26
Posts: 350
Blueadept, apologies if it appeared that I was trolling. It wasn't deliberate.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:34 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:01
Posts: 3
Location: Wiltshire
byny wrote:
I am merely posting an opinion in a debate

Then why not try posting your opinions in the correct forum?

This forum is about the proposed protest on the M4. There are other more suitable threads for you to air your views and get the attention you so badly seek, there is no need to hijack this one.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:53
Posts: 25
Location: Wales, Newport/Cardiff
Munkster wrote:
byny wrote:
I am merely posting an opinion in a debate

Then why not try posting your opinions in the correct forum?

This forum is about the proposed protest on the M4. There are other more suitable threads for you to air your views and get the attention you so badly seek, there is no need to hijack this one.


Point taken but As others have widened the debate within this one I feel it is more than appropriate for me to continue the discussion also.

thank you

_________________
freedom is knowledge of one's necessity


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 00:32
Posts: 23
Location: London
byny wrote:
Hi there - I just joined and really only to make this point....

I took my test a year ago and since then I have never had a fine for speeding, All I have had to do to avoid this is drive within the legal speed limit as indicated by the road signs.


Hello indeed,

I took my test nearly 20 years ago, and I have also never had a fine for speeding.... While traveling almost a million miles. I have also never damaged a car while driving it...

I think that qualifies me to air my opinion that the recent changes in enforcement policy will criminalise many very safe drivers, for traveling a few miles per hour over a speed limit (which may have recently been lowered for no good reason)... when it would clearly be quite safe to travel faster.

Your opinion is abundently clear... so lets leave it at that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:53
Posts: 25
Location: Wales, Newport/Cardiff
BlueAdept wrote:
byny wrote:
Hi there - I just joined and really only to make this point....

I took my test a year ago and since then I have never had a fine for speeding, All I have had to do to avoid this is drive within the legal speed limit as indicated by the road signs.


Hello indeed,

I took my test nearly 20 years ago, and I have also never had a fine for speeding.... While traveling almost a million miles. I have also never damaged a car while driving it...

I think that qualifies me to air my opinion that the recent changes in enforcement policy will criminalise many very safe drivers, for traveling a few miles per hour over a speed limit (which may have recently been lowered for no good reason)... when it would clearly be quite safe to travel faster.

Your opinion is abundently clear... so lets leave it at that.


it is lovely to know that you put me on such an equal footing, many others may try to push forward the view that they are more qualified to have an opinion because of their experience, I applaud you for not doing so and I am glad that my views are clear enough for you to understand.

_________________
freedom is knowledge of one's necessity


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 13:05 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:01
Posts: 3
Location: Wiltshire
byny wrote:
Point taken but As others have widened the debate within this one I feel it is more than appropriate for me to continue the discussion also.

thank you

Happy to help.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 13:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
Lets hope these cameras are successful and are put into place on more motorways to stop people breaking the law by driving above 70mph


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M4 Speed Cameras
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 13:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 09:44
Posts: 516
Location: Swindon, the home of the Magic Roundabout and no traffic planning
fred wrote:
Lets hope these cameras are successful and are put into place on more motorways to stop people breaking the law by driving above 70mph


Ever read the book 1984?

_________________
"Are you sh**ing me?"
"John Spartan, you are fined one credit for a violation of the verbal morality statute."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: 1984 Book
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 13:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
No


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1984 Book
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 13:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 09:44
Posts: 516
Location: Swindon, the home of the Magic Roundabout and no traffic planning
fred wrote:
No


I suggest that you do, and be afraid, very afraid. Speed cameras are just the start.

Consistent real-time government monitoring of the populace is just around the corner.

At the end of the day, you are missing the point of the protest. Its nothing to do with speeding and breaking the law. In fact, i myself rarely go above about 68 mph along that stretch of the M4, even before cameras. It is nice to have the ability to overtake a lorry, for example, in the quickest time possible by breaking the limit slightly. A traffic officer would observe this behaivour, and if performed correctly would have no issue. A robot does not provide this facility, neither does it prevent bad driving and incorrect speed for the conditions, which a traffic officer does

_________________
"Are you sh**ing me?"
"John Spartan, you are fined one credit for a violation of the verbal morality statute."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1984 Book
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 13:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:53
Posts: 25
Location: Wales, Newport/Cardiff
blademansw wrote:
fred wrote:
No


I suggest that you do, and be afraid, very afraid. Speed cameras are just the start.

Consistent real-time government monitoring of the populace is just around the corner.

At the end of the day, you are missing the point of the protest. Its nothing to do with speeding and breaking the law. In fact, i myself rarely go above about 68 mph along that stretch of the M4, even before cameras. It is nice to have the ability to overtake a lorry, for example, in the quickest time possible by breaking the limit slightly. A traffic officer would observe this behaivour, and if performed correctly would have no issue. A robot does not provide this facility, neither does it prevent bad driving and incorrect speed for the conditions, which a traffic officer does


Ah - so you're against speed cameras because they have the potential to be used to monitor the population a la 1984, NOT because you think they are a money making scheme or because you want to drive fast?

_________________
freedom is knowledge of one's necessity


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1984 Book
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 13:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
blademansw wrote:
fred wrote:
No


I suggest that you do, and be afraid, very afraid. Speed cameras are just the start.

Consistent real-time government monitoring of the populace is just around the corner.

At the end of the day, you are missing the point of the protest. Its nothing to do with speeding and breaking the law. In fact, i myself rarely go above about 68 mph along that stretch of the M4, even before cameras. It is nice to have the ability to overtake a lorry, for example, in the quickest time possible by breaking the limit slightly. A traffic officer would observe this behaivour, and if performed correctly would have no issue. A robot does not provide this facility, neither does it prevent bad driving and incorrect speed for the conditions, which a traffic officer does


I'll get myself a copy.
Unfortunately the fact of the matter is that there has to be a limit whether it be 70, 80 or whatever. And this limit should be strictly enforced both with cameras and police. You cant have a variable limit, ie 60 in rain, 75 for passing lorries, 90 at 3 in the morning etc as it would be possble to enforce. I do think there should be more traffic police to catch bad driving such as going to fast in fog. Correct me if I am wrong but I think they tried a lower spead limit in france for bad weather (not sure if it worked)
It seems the people on this forum cannot accept that the 70 mph is the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 338 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.036s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]