Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Oct 27, 2025 00:33

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 338 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 17  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 15:19 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
T shirt ready for the day

Image

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 15:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
You haveny answered my questions - how do you decide?
I have always said I am not against more traffic police. But you have to have a speed limit which should be enforced more rigourously - 70 mph is enough


Why exactly should it be enforced more rigorously? It was only introduced during the fuel crisis of the 70's as a means of conserving fuel. Now people like yourself unquestioningly champion it.

The ability to drive at whatever speed you happen to drive at should really be your own choice-and if you aren't going to get penalised for it by a TRAFFIC OFFICER then he agrees with you. Those that are unsafe to drive at the speed they do are also the ones that pile up when they slam on the brakes when they see a scamera-hence not getting flashed for it.


you still havent answered my question- HOW do you decide who is safe to drive their 1.6 litre at 100 mph - an expereinced driver with advanced training or the just passed his test 17 year old - Do you want someone vetting them at each slip road - Yes you look experienced you can go 90. No your not experieced you had better stick to 60??
Fred


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 15:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 00:06
Posts: 301
Location: Swindon
fred wrote:
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
You haveny answered my questions - how do you decide?
I have always said I am not against more traffic police. But you have to have a speed limit which should be enforced more rigourously - 70 mph is enough


Why exactly should it be enforced more rigorously? It was only introduced during the fuel crisis of the 70's as a means of conserving fuel. Now people like yourself unquestioningly champion it.

The ability to drive at whatever speed you happen to drive at should really be your own choice-and if you aren't going to get penalised for it by a TRAFFIC OFFICER then he agrees with you. Those that are unsafe to drive at the speed they do are also the ones that pile up when they slam on the brakes when they see a scamera-hence not getting flashed for it.


you still havent answered my question- HOW do you decide who is safe to drive their 1.6 litre at 100 mph - an expereinced driver with advanced training or the just passed his test 17 year old - Do you want someone vetting them at each slip road - Yes you look experienced you can go 90. No your not experieced you had better stick to 60??
Fred


How about "I'm a traffic officer-you arent driving like a complete dick-therefore you're safe to be on the road."
I'm not a traffic officer-and NEITHER ARE YOU. Therefore YOU PERSONALLY arent qualified to decide.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 15:30 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
As fred seems to be an 'experienced' possibly even 'advanced' driver. I have one question for him.

If there were no speed limits on a road, how would he decide what the maximum safe speed was?

and no helping from anyone else.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 15:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
You haveny answered my questions - how do you decide?
I have always said I am not against more traffic police. But you have to have a speed limit which should be enforced more rigourously - 70 mph is enough


Why exactly should it be enforced more rigorously? It was only introduced during the fuel crisis of the 70's as a means of conserving fuel. Now people like yourself unquestioningly champion it.

The ability to drive at whatever speed you happen to drive at should really be your own choice-and if you aren't going to get penalised for it by a TRAFFIC OFFICER then he agrees with you. Those that are unsafe to drive at the speed they do are also the ones that pile up when they slam on the brakes when they see a scamera-hence not getting flashed for it.


you still havent answered my question- HOW do you decide who is safe to drive their 1.6 litre at 100 mph - an expereinced driver with advanced training or the just passed his test 17 year old - Do you want someone vetting them at each slip road - Yes you look experienced you can go 90. No your not experieced you had better stick to 60??
Fred


How about "I'm a traffic officer-you arent driving like a complete dick-therefore you're safe to be on the road."


That would be totally impracticle and unworkable, besides someone does not have to be driving like a dick to be driving beyond there capabilities. We can all do 90 but can everyone react at that speed in an emergency, or bring the car to a safe stop in the event of a blowout? - I think not. at least at a 70mph maximum most would have a better chance
Fred


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 15:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
diy wrote:
As fred seems to be an 'experienced' possibly even 'advanced' driver. I have one question for him.

If there were no speed limits on a road, how would he decide what the maximum safe speed was?

and no helping from anyone else.


I know how I would decide - the trouble is many drivers do not know their own limits - therefore it is safer that they are controlled to 70 rather than be allowed to go as as fast as they want


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 15:39 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 00:06
Posts: 301
Location: Swindon
fred wrote:
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
You haveny answered my questions - how do you decide?
I have always said I am not against more traffic police. But you have to have a speed limit which should be enforced more rigourously - 70 mph is enough


Why exactly should it be enforced more rigorously? It was only introduced during the fuel crisis of the 70's as a means of conserving fuel. Now people like yourself unquestioningly champion it.

The ability to drive at whatever speed you happen to drive at should really be your own choice-and if you aren't going to get penalised for it by a TRAFFIC OFFICER then he agrees with you. Those that are unsafe to drive at the speed they do are also the ones that pile up when they slam on the brakes when they see a scamera-hence not getting flashed for it.


you still havent answered my question- HOW do you decide who is safe to drive their 1.6 litre at 100 mph - an expereinced driver with advanced training or the just passed his test 17 year old - Do you want someone vetting them at each slip road - Yes you look experienced you can go 90. No your not experieced you had better stick to 60??
Fred


How about "I'm a traffic officer-you arent driving like a complete dick-therefore you're safe to be on the road."


That would be totally impracticle and unworkable, besides someone does not have to be driving like a dick to be driving beyond there capabilities. We can all do 90 but can everyone react at that speed in an emergency, or bring the car to a safe stop in the event of a blowout? - I think not. at least at a 70mph maximum most would have a better chance
Fred


If you're driving beyond your capabilities then you ARE driving like a complete dick.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 15:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
Nos4r2 wrote:
fred wrote:
You haveny answered my questions - how do you decide?
I have always said I am not against more traffic police. But you have to have a speed limit which should be enforced more rigourously - 70 mph is enough


Why exactly should it be enforced more rigorously? It was only introduced during the fuel crisis of the 70's as a means of conserving fuel. Now people like yourself unquestioningly champion it.

The ability to drive at whatever speed you happen to drive at should really be your own choice-and if you aren't going to get penalised for it by a TRAFFIC OFFICER then he agrees with you. Those that are unsafe to drive at the speed they do are also the ones that pile up when they slam on the brakes when they see a scamera-hence not getting flashed for it.


you still havent answered my question- HOW do you decide who is safe to drive their 1.6 litre at 100 mph - an expereinced driver with advanced training or the just passed his test 17 year old - Do you want someone vetting them at each slip road - Yes you look experienced you can go 90. No your not experieced you had better stick to 60??
Fred


How about "I'm a traffic officer-you arent driving like a complete dick-therefore you're safe to be on the road."


That would be totally impracticle and unworkable, besides someone does not have to be driving like a dick to be driving beyond there capabilities. We can all do 90 but can everyone react at that speed in an emergency, or bring the car to a safe stop in the event of a blowout? - I think not. at least at a 70mph maximum most would have a better chance
Fred


If you're driving beyond your capabilities then you ARE driving like a complete dick.


Exactly - But how do you stop people doing it - Do you expect there to be enough traffic police on the roads to review everyones driving?
Fred


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 16:04 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:52
Posts: 947
Location: falkirk
Nos4r2 wrote:

If you're driving beyond your capabilities then you ARE driving like a complete dick.


even i cant argue with that one :lol:

_________________
Richie

SSAFA supporter
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126025031585


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 16:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 00:06
Posts: 301
Location: Swindon
Decent driver training would be a good start-along with SENSIBLE awareness adverts- think bike, dont dazzle dip your headlights-all the stuff from the 60's 70's and 80's that disappeared. Promoting awareness of the consequences of your speed eg-are can you control your car if you have a puncture at this speed? I'm confident I won't have a blowout-my tyres are Kevlar belted on my bike and filled with instant sealer-AND rated to 200mph,though I don't ride at anywhere near that speed.-not ridiculous ads designed to shift blame. I recall one from a couple of years ago where a driver was made to look in the wrong for doing 30 in a 30 limit because a van pulled out 10 feet from him and he couldnt avoid it.

EDUCATION not LEGISLATION is the answer. Always has been. People treat driving as a right but it's not. It's a privelege and it's subject to you PERSONALLY being safe-and EDUCATED as to the meaning of safe.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 16:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
Nos4r2 wrote:
Decent driver training would be a good start-along with SENSIBLE awareness adverts- think bike, dont dazzle dip your headlights-all the stuff from the 60's 70's and 80's that disappeared. Promoting awareness of the consequences of your speed eg-are can you control your car if you have a puncture at this speed? I'm confident I won't have a blowout-my tyres are Kevlar belted on my bike and filled with instant sealer-AND rated to 200mph,though I don't ride at anywhere near that speed.-not ridiculous ads designed to shift blame. I recall one from a couple of years ago where a driver was made to look in the wrong for doing 30 in a 30 limit because a van pulled out 10 feet from him and he couldnt avoid it.

EDUCATION not LEGISLATION is the answer. Always has been. People treat driving as a right but it's not. It's a privelege and it's subject to you PERSONALLY being safe-and EDUCATED as to the meaning of safe.


totally agree with the above but you will always get the boy racers and those who think they are better than they are


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 16:22 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:52
Posts: 947
Location: falkirk
couldnt agree more :)

_________________
Richie

SSAFA supporter
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126025031585


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 16:23 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 09:54
Posts: 47
I am on your side now I have read all the gumf from Paul Smith. Just wish the dickheads could be kept off the roads - hope the protest goes well - I am afraid I cannot be there however.

All the best

Fred Ingram :D


Last edited by fred on Mon Apr 25, 2005 16:38, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 16:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 00:06
Posts: 301
Location: Swindon
Thanks for an interesting debate Fred. :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 17:06 
Offline
Police Officer and Member
Police Officer and Member

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 22:53
Posts: 565
Location: Kendal
fred wrote:
Nos4r2 wrote:
Decent driver training would be a good start-along with SENSIBLE awareness adverts- think bike, dont dazzle dip your headlights-all the stuff from the 60's 70's and 80's that disappeared. Promoting awareness of the consequences of your speed eg-are can you control your car if you have a puncture at this speed? I'm confident I won't have a blowout-my tyres are Kevlar belted on my bike and filled with instant sealer-AND rated to 200mph,though I don't ride at anywhere near that speed.-not ridiculous ads designed to shift blame. I recall one from a couple of years ago where a driver was made to look in the wrong for doing 30 in a 30 limit because a van pulled out 10 feet from him and he couldnt avoid it.

EDUCATION not LEGISLATION is the answer. Always has been. People treat driving as a right but it's not. It's a privelege and it's subject to you PERSONALLY being safe-and EDUCATED as to the meaning of safe.


totally agree with the above but you will always get the boy racers and those who think they are better than they are


The point with boy racers (and to some degree weekend bikers - although I don't want to ruffle any feathers) is that their activity is usually a considered drive towards and sometimes beyond the bounds of their ability. They are often aware of the attention which their driving would attract therefore it is generally done away from camera sites, so no beneficial effect there.

The picture is a little more complicated than the simple (both meanings of the word) message Speed Kills. It does - it provides the momentum which kills, but the killers have to be further defined. They are NOT the average Joe driving down the motorway at 79 to 90 miles per hour. If stats could show it, I believe (from experience dealing with hundreds of collisions) that these drivers would statistically be our safest drivers, yet they are routinely penalised for this.

When you dig into it a little fred, you start to realise that the Speed Kills message makes less and less sense.

Then when you consider that remote prosecution is becoming the main thrust of the enforcement side of road safety, gradually but remorselessly taking over from road policing, you start to wonder why this is.

Many on this forum believe they know why. I couldn't possibly comment :wink: .

_________________
Fixed ideas are like cramp, for instance in the foot, yet the best remedy is to step on them.

Ian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 17:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 00:06
Posts: 301
Location: Swindon
You won't ruffle mine Ian- I've been riding 17 years day in day out and have had one accident in that time that's been my own fault-5mph on diesel that I didnt see.I have however been run into 4 or 5 times from behind and knocked off twice from behind.I only use the car for towing my boat and shopping I can't carry home. I agree-weekend bikers need educating too. There are NO exceptions. I could probably do with some myself but I do actively try my hardest not to make myself a statistic.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 17:55 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 13:13
Posts: 116
fred wrote:
I am on your side now I have read all the gumf from Paul Smith. Just wish the dickheads could be kept off the roads - hope the protest goes well - I am afraid I cannot be there however.

All the best

Fred Ingram :D


blimey , good for you Fred...

I hope the world now gets back to arranging for more and more people to turn up...

rgds
bill


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 18:02 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 13:25
Posts: 6
Location: Farnham Surrey
Paul, Just took out a Gold membership, trust the funds will help you to keep up the great work.

This now means that we can only have three new tyres when we race at Croft :lol: :lol: but it's worth it

I'll be there on Saturday :twisted: :twisted:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 19:23 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
RacingZ3M wrote:
This now means that we can only have three new tyres when we race at Croft :lol: :lol: but it's worth it


No probs at Croft a set of tyres should last all season..... :lol:

Ok I have been away a week. Just tried to trawl through the pages of this thread but got bored reading all the off-topic rubish. This is about the protest yes?

So is safespeed meeting up on the way or in a designated spot on the services.

Maybe Paul could post a thread as an announcement.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 22:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Gizmo wrote:
So is safespeed meeting up on the way or in a designated spot on the services.

Maybe Paul could post a thread as an announcement.


We have to make arrangements for a post protest press conference / photocall. We were going to have it at a Heathrow Hotel, but the latest idea is Membury eastbound. As soon as these details are firm we can arrange a Safe Speed meet - maybe at the press conference if we have space for supporters and journalists. I'd like to see supporters in the photos. :)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 338 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.054s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]