Graeme wrote:
And because whatever happens they'll just change the rules so they can carry on ....
I've been thinking about this (I know it's dangerous of me) but doe's anyone think that because the Government sense they might loose at the ECHR on the 27th it's the reason they have made the amendments to this:
Rebalancing the criminal justice system in favour of the law-abiding majority Cutting crime, reducing reoffending and protecting the public Home Office July 2006And brought in this:
Quote:
restrict the ability of the plainly guilty to have
their convictions quashed because of a
procedural irregularity, and will consult how
this is best achieved in practice;
What do they class as procedural irregularities?