BottyBurp wrote:
adam.L wrote:
So lets have a think. Kick the side stand from under a stationary motorcycle and it falls over. So even with the engine off, bikes arn't the last word in safety.
And you get put in hospital by the owner
adam.L wrote:
I'm struggling with the mentality that goes with buying a machine that does 0-60 in 3 secs, touch 100mph in first and pull wheelies in the first 3 gears and then worry about safety. It's like keeping a pet tiger and worrying it will bite you.
My bike pulls wheelies in 4th gear as well.
But seriously, what's the problem with having that amount of power available? I have that sort of power cos:
a) I enjoy it
b) I can handle it
c) I know when to use and when not to use it
d) at 6'5" & 18 stone, I'd look damn silly on a scooter
e) I don't want to have to be forever changing gears on a slight gradient
The point I am trying to make is that people buy bikes, especialy fast ones for thrill seeking. Why else would the lastest 600 or 1000cc sports bike need to be even more frantic and exiciting than last years? You don't buy a machine that does 0-100 in 5 seconds and does 100mph rolling wheelies with safety at the forefront of your mind do you? I'm not saying for one second that you want to crash, but if you safety was at the forefront of your mind you'd be buying a Volvo.
Don't most people crash bikes unassisted? If that is the case instead of spending £££ on noisey pipes why not spend less money on dvanced training so you judge the corner instead of inspecting in scenery?
Do you think that (as I've already asked) Wayne in his chavved up Saxo is safer with is Dustbin for an exhaust than he would be with the stock one?
If your noisey pipes are a safety feature, can I assume all of you noisy sods enjoy significantly lower insurance premiums?
Oh, and don't even think about ear plugs if you've got loud pipes. You choose them so live with them.