PeterE wrote:
Many of those who oppose the "SafeSpeed" view seem to see the issue in totally different terms of reference. It's not simply a question of "how do we make the roads safer?" but whether it is fundamentally a good idea for the main form of transport to be, in their terms, people driving around in ton-and-a-half armoured metal boxes.
Personally, I see private motor transport as, broadly speaking, an instrument of individual liberation, whereas they see it as something destructive of their vision of society. Therefore each side will inevitably see the other as evading the point, and there's a kind of mutual incomprehension.
This is a problem that I've faced frequently in arguments and discussions with our "opponents". I've usually declared "no interest" in transport ideology, and explained that my interest lies purely in getting the system that we have to work better.
Personally I share Peter's view that personal motor transport is liberating, but that view is entirely outside the Safe Speed road safety work.
I do believe that different transport ideologies have fuelled the "speed kills" thing. That's a real shame - and maybe a serious error. Transport ideologies are one thing - road safety is another. I do feel they need to be kept well and truly separate.
Thanks for an interesting post, Peter.