Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 12:08

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 08:31 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Heard on the radio this morning, the EU have said that UK drivers are to be told to drive on dipped headlights during the daytime.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 08:48 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Found this in the Sun Newspaper

Quote:
Headlights on in day, says EU
By DAVID WOODING
October 11, 2006

BRITISH motorists are to be forced to drive with their headlights on during daytime under new EU laws.

Ministers admitted yesterday they were losing a battle to opt out of the proposed rules.

Eurocrats want all member states to follow Scandinavia, where dipped headlights are compulsory on all moving vehicles 24 hours a day.

They say it would slash the number of accidents by making traffic more visible.

But motoring groups warn it would boost fuel consumption and exhaust emissions by three per cent.

And bikers — who currently use their lights to stand out in daylight — say they would lose the benefit if all cars did the same.

Road safety minister Stephen Ladyman is fighting the proposals, which could become law by 2010.

He told MPs: “I have strongly opposed to this but I am increasingly pessimistic. A number of powerful states believe it is a good idea.”

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 08:53 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
And if there's mass disobedience...?

I give up - I just haven't got the energy to even get upset about this crap anymore :(

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 08:58 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Sixy_the_red wrote:
And if there's mass disobedience...?


Just another excuse for FPN's :(

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 09:06 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
hmph. So we'll have DRL cameras next then I suppose. :(

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:01 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
The idea that our road safety policy will be progressively dictated by Brussels is pretty seriously scary. I have seen no sign that they know anything about the subject. :(

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:26 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
SafeSpeed wrote:
The idea that our road safety policy will be progressively dictated by Brussels is pretty seriously scary. I have seen no sign that they know anything about the subject. :(


I agree. It seemed in the past that the UK government just rolled over and accepted everything passed down from Brussels without question. Its even more scary to realise that Ladyman is (supposedly) opposing the proposals and Brussels are effectively forcing them through anyway. It seems as though the UK's been a doormat for so long that we no longer have our own voice.

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
Italy succeeded in passing a modification to the legislation that only made it compulsory to use headlights outside built-up areas.

Still not ideal..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:38 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 21:39
Posts: 140
Location: St Annes
Sixy_the_red wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
The idea that our road safety policy will be progressively dictated by Brussels is pretty seriously scary. I have seen no sign that they know anything about the subject. :(


I agree. It seemed in the past that the UK government just rolled over and accepted everything passed down from Brussels without question. Its even more scary to realise that Ladyman is (supposedly) opposing the proposals and Brussels are effectively forcing them through anyway. It seems as though the UK's been a doormat for so long that we no longer have our own voice.


While watching the 'Road safety bill' reading on BBC Parliament on Monday, there was a section to do with reflective stickers on goods vehicles over 3.5t. Apparently from 2010 they must all have reflective stickers on the back and sides (when this was introduced in the USA it reduced accidents by 45%). An MP had put an amendment in to have this introduced from something like 2008. Ladyman went on to say that we cannot bring it in earlier than agreed without facing penalties. Apparently Italy are bringing this in ahead of schedule.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:50 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
I do hope FJSRiDER isn't reading this subject - he'd have an apoplectic fit!

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 13:31 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
cerberus wrote:
While watching the 'Road safety bill' reading on BBC Parliament on Monday, there was a section to do with reflective stickers on goods vehicles over 3.5t. Apparently from 2010 they must all have reflective stickers on the back and sides (when this was introduced in the USA it reduced accidents by 45%). An MP had put an amendment in to have this introduced from something like 2008. Ladyman went on to say that we cannot bring it in earlier than agreed without facing penalties. Apparently Italy are bringing this in ahead of schedule.


OK, I freely admit not being a keen student of American road safety data but can anyone tell me what year American road accidents nearly HALVED? I'm sure it would have made the news!

Maybe they meant 45% "at the camera sites".... :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 13:43 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
For what it's worth, though, I'm not that bothered about daytime running lights one way or the other but what seems the most dangerous situation to ME is where you have traffic with a mixture of lighting intensities. If you have a load of cars coming towards you on a wet night with dipped headlights on and then someone sidelights, they can be instantaneously invisible unless you look carefully. Now I know everyone should look carefully all the time but, human nature being what it is....

Cars with automatic headlights that sense ambient light intensity already exist. I think that if Brussels wanted to dream up some new Directive to keep itself in a job, they'd be better off making it a requirement for all vehicles to have automatic headlamps AND for all automatic headlamps to come on at the same light intensity. That would save needless power consumption (150watts PER CAR or about 1/5 horsepower!) in sunnier climes too! (Wouldn't solve the problem of silhouetted bikes though!)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 14:08 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 15:14
Posts: 420
Location: Aberdeenshire
Personally (and I knwo some disagree) I think all vehicles should light up when there is no reflective daylight* - otherwise I see no point in expending fuel and masking motorcycles.

I think the reason behind this legislation is, as always, the odd pillock driving along in fog or pissing rain (but in "broad daylight") with no lights on, so he's very hard to see from a distance, and for HGV drivers looking at spray in their mirrors, he's as good as invisible.

Again another product of a lack of traffic police and education :roll:


*My own term to describe the level of light intensity to make shiney things shine. On sunny days for example, cars etc tend to reflect daylight and are so visible that the addition of lights is unhelpful. On very dull days or days with limited visibility such vehicles do not reflect light and merge nicely into their backdrop until the human eye detects them thanks to relative motion against background. Often this is too late for comfort IMO.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 14:41 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 21:39
Posts: 140
Location: St Annes
Mole wrote:
cerberus wrote:
While watching the 'Road safety bill' reading on BBC Parliament on Monday, there was a section to do with reflective stickers on goods vehicles over 3.5t. Apparently from 2010 they must all have reflective stickers on the back and sides (when this was introduced in the USA it reduced accidents by 45%). An MP had put an amendment in to have this introduced from something like 2008. Ladyman went on to say that we cannot bring it in earlier than agreed without facing penalties. Apparently Italy are bringing this in ahead of schedule.


OK, I freely admit not being a keen student of American road safety data but can anyone tell me what year American road accidents nearly HALVED? I'm sure it would have made the news!

Maybe they meant 45% "at the camera sites".... :wink:


Ok - could have made it clearer - I think the 45% was to do with accidents where people had collisions with lorries (stationary and moving)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 17:01 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
It saves education, it is dumbing down. Some people can't think to put there lights on, make everyone put them on. easy problem solved. :oops:

Thats the way it seems to be at the moment.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 18:34 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
I wouldn't mind if people's lights weren't so often badly adjusted.


I look forward to being constantly dazzled, rather than just frequently.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 18:40 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
I think I shall be buying shares in a few car battery manufacturers.

If you stop driving during the day, you are not going to think to turn your lights off.


Thank goodness my Legacy automatically kills the lights on shut down, then has a separate switch if you want parking lights.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 20:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 00:51
Posts: 160
surely all the cars in Scandinavia have lights that come on automatically with the ignition, so you cannot forget to turn them on

if this law was brought in here it would only be for cars manufactured after a certain date as we couldn't all be expected to remember all the time at first could we?

_________________
Welcome to the UK, the Land of "Selective Freedoms"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 20:54 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
Johnnytheboy wrote:
I wouldn't mind if people's lights weren't so often badly adjusted.


I look forward to being constantly dazzled, rather than just frequently.



What about people who drive on full beam all the time?

or will using full beam get banned?

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 22:44 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
DRL report

Quote:
It appeared that, when setting up European guidelines for the implementation of DRL, it is clear that the following issues will have to be addressed:
- pedestrians, cyclists, mopeds less conspicuous;
- motorcyclists less conspicuous; - glare;
- increased fuel consumption;
- increased CO2 emission;
- more frequently burned out bulbs;
- flat batteries; - reduced conspicuity of brake lights;
- if carrying dedicated reduced intensity DRL, drivers forget to switch on dipped headlights in reduced visibility conditions;
- “masking” of unlit vehicles by lit ones in mixed daytime circulation.


Yep lots to think about.......but what the hell, lets introduce it anyway. Isn't that how it works :x

They have also calculated casualty reduction..............How the f*ck they have done that is anyones guess.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 143 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.021s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]