greenv8s wrote:
Roger wrote:
Only just caught up with this one. I think for low-geared non-assisted steering the mechanical advantage is so low that either the rack or pinion would be stripped or a track rod end/steering knuckle pulled ouy before it sent the steering wheel spinning that visciously. For the higher geared assisted systems more commonplace today... I think it depends if the assist mechanism bottoms or gets defeated. If it does, Paul is right - and it will be even worse than the old systems due to its more direct gearing.
I don't know what experience that is based on, but I don't think it's realistic. The steering systems used on production cars don't eliminate kick-back, and are easily strong enough to cause physical injury. I know a former rally driver who has broken both forearms because he could not train himself to let go of the wheel, and production cars are no better. The steering is easily capable of transmitting forces higher than the driver can resist even with a firm two handed grip, and in a crash it is almost certain that the steering wheel will be ripped from your hands if the front wheels hit anything.
i think the point here is that by it's very nature steering assist systems will help the driver resist such kickback meaning the driver (or his thumbs) will feel less force for a given input than the same ratio system without.
(this is why in part any assist system reduces road feel)
this is probably only true within the bandwidth of that system, which will vary on what kind it is.
in most of the emergency or impact scenarios above, the speed of the input may be high enough to negate this effect.
i also agree that power steer systems allow manufacturers to choose more direct ratios and hence allow higher torque's back up the steering column than a higher geared manual system.