basingwerk wrote:
You can't crash into people in those things, so it matters less how they are marketed.
So? You can still do that in a non-sexy vehicle marketed in a completely different way. I can see what your saying about people getting sucked in by the marketing, but doesn't that say more about the consumers who fall for it? And if they're going to respond to that sort of marketing can you blame the motor companies for using it to sell their products? Besides, you can still crash into someone in a Perodua, which is hardly marketed in a sexy way. They seem to promote low cost and practicality, yet misused it can still be as lethal as an Aston or something else that gets Jeremy Clarkson salivating. The marketing is irrelevant to the safety issue.
basingwerk wrote:
But instead, car manufacturers make much of their power and speed and how strong you look in them! Cars as jewellery.
Not sure I'd describe any of the current adverts in quite that way, but if by "cars as jewellery" you're saying that the adverts push its looks or its appeal as a status symbol, then yes, I'm with you there. I just don't have an issue with it.
basingwerk wrote:
But these expectations are frustrated on our crowded roads and who could care less about what anybody else is driving anyway.
Me neither. I care more about what I'm driving. Not to impress anyone else, but for entirely personal reasons. One of which is that I enjoy driving it.
basingwerk wrote:
I can understand why women buy makeup, but why do guys buy mobile mechanical body armour? Penis envy?
Eh? So when a bloke buys a car it's mechanical body armour. What is it when a woman buys a car? A little even handedness, please! Besides, anyone with half an ounce of sense will not be buying a car as body armour, since there's no gurantee it'll perform as such.
basingwerk wrote:
Gatsobait wrote:
basingwerk wrote:
The vast majority are due driver error.
Not speeding then?

Sorry mate, couldn't resist.
Speeding is driver error, especially if you get caught!
Is it less of an error if you don't get caught? Actually, don't answer that in case we get into noiseless trees falling over in unpopulated forests.

I know what you mean. But (and you know what I'm going to say

) speeding is not necessarily a driver error in itself, but driving at an inappropriate speed is always a driver error. Incidentally, I'd include driving at too low a speed as well.