Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Feb 02, 2026 15:02

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 288 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 19:55 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
SafeSpeed wrote:
prof beard wrote:
And so the attempts to rubbish the petition's success begin:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 90,00.html


Oh we know... look up! :)


D'Oh! (I've just got in)

They just had the chap on BBC Midlands Today - piece didn't mention the ABD and the petitions back into overdrive...

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 20:02 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Just checked the BBC poll
http://www.bbc.co.uk/eastmidlandstoday/content/articles/2006/12/31/congestion_vote_feature.shtml

89% say no to conjestion charging!

The e-poll is over 266,000 now. And it still has over one month to go.

So whats the next milestone............half a million :roll:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:46 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
worth reading, the ABD press statement

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 17:56 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
314,850
It went up by ~200 as I read ABD statment

now 314,887 :shock:

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 17:59 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
I'm quite annoyed by the Times reporting

Quote:
A Downing Street experiment in internet democracy has been hijacked by a hardline motoring organisation that is promoting a petition against nationwide congestion charging.


The petition both fair and valid in the request and the methods used to promote it. If viral marketing is good enough for most of the major companies nowadays then it is a perfectly acceptable method to promote what is, possibly intentionally by the government, a little known site and a worthwhile petition. As soon as I found out about the petition I posted it on my blog and various others as a comment.

The fact that the Times is denigrating a valid petition in an as yet immature method of contacting and thus engaging the government with the feeling of the people smacks of poor journalism. I wonder about Ben Webster's (the article's journalist) political inclinations and whether he drives a Prius.

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 07:24 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Currently: 328,522

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:14 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
telegraph Road-pricing scheme will cause more accidentsThe introduction of pay-as-you-drive road-pricing could lead to more accidents, according to research carried out on behalf of the Department for Transport.

Safety campaigners warned last night that the introduction of such a scheme could lead to a "transfer of risk", especially if drivers switch from motorways to minor roads to avoid paying premium prices.

There are also fears that discouraging driving during the rush hour could lead to more motorists travelling before dawn or after dusk – especially during the winter – to cut the cost of commuting.


The potential safety hazards of road-pricing were contained in evidence submitted to the Commons transport select committee by the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (Pacts). It included a Transport Department feasibility study into road-pricing in 2004 that warned that rerouting could lead to more accidents.

It noted: "This is due to the increased number of vehicles using smaller roads not built for high demand, which could lead to higher accident rates."

Any pricing structure would have to minimise the incentives to reroute.

A study carried out by TRL, formerly the Government's Transport Research Laboratory, examined what would happen if a 2.5 pence a mile toll was introduced on Kent motorways. It found that about 10 per cent of traffic would be diverted to other roads. This, it noted, would lead to a 3.5 per cent increase in accidents.

Robert Gifford, the director of Pacts, said that the group was neutral over whether road-pricing should be introduced, but argued that more factors than easing congestion had to be taken into account.

"In making that decision, it will need to balance the need for a simple pricing system against the implications for transfer of risk," he said.

Duncan Vernon, the road safety officer for The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, said: "The possibility of an increase in accidents is something that needs to be examined and one thing that could be considered is if safety could be integrated into the charging scheme to encourage drivers to use safer roads at safer times."

No 10 is committed to piloting road-pricing trials, which are expected to be in place by the end of the decade.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:22 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
anton wrote:
Safety campaigners warned last night that the introduction of such a scheme could lead to a "transfer of risk", especially if drivers switch from motorways to minor roads to avoid paying premium prices.

There are also fears that discouraging driving during the rush hour could lead to more motorists travelling before dawn or after dusk – especially during the winter – to cut the cost of commuting.


Oh look! A lifeboat.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:42 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:47
Posts: 920
Location: South Bucks
SafeSpeed wrote:
anton wrote:
Safety campaigners warned last night that the introduction of such a scheme could lead to a "transfer of risk", especially if drivers switch from motorways to minor roads to avoid paying premium prices.

There are also fears that discouraging driving during the rush hour could lead to more motorists travelling before dawn or after dusk – especially during the winter – to cut the cost of commuting.


Oh look! A lifeboat.


Cynic? Moi?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:50 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
It has just passed a third of a million

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:00 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Gizmo wrote:
It has just passed a third of a million


No it hasn't. Currently: 330,408 (which is less than 333,333.3)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:06 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
It's okay, noone panic, they'll prevent accidents in the areas of displaced congestion with more speed cameras.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: !
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
There won't be any displaced congestion, they'll just charge more for using country roads.
All these ideas have nothing to do with congestion, and nothing to do with pollution, but a lot to do with taxation, and more-than-a-little to do with inventing jobs for the luvvies.
I note that the times is part of news international, an organisation not renowmed for its democratic leanings.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 15:06 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Never mind a petition that you can join from your home, it is said that one million people turned out for the Countryside Alliance march against the foxhunting ban. A great success that protest, wasn't it.

You can report all the numbers you want voting on this but it won't make any difference. The purpose of these Number 10 on-line petitions is to make the masses feel better, not to affect policy by gauging public opinion.

"Cynic? Moi?"

Oh, yes.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 17:02 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
More accidents = more deaths = less people using the road = less congestion....?
Maybe their scheme will work. :roll:

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 18:50 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
SafeSpeed wrote:
Gizmo wrote:
It has just passed a third of a million


No it hasn't. Currently: 330,408 (which is less than 333,333.3)


Ok OK.....it has now... :lol:

malcolmw wrote:
You can report all the numbers you want voting on this but it won't make any difference. The purpose of these Number 10 on-line petitions is to make the masses feel better, not to affect policy by gauging public opinion.

"Cynic? Moi?"

Oh, yes.


If it wasn't for "people power" we would still have the poll tax. And fuel would be more expensive.

At the very least it has got people thinking about the issue. Many of the people I have spoken to did not know anything about the proposed tax. It has (and will) bring it to the attention of the media. Most have been talking about it affecting the credibility of this critical Government policy.

There are 30 million motorists out there, most of them of voting age. There is at least one election between now and the proposed introduction.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 21:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
This will all be quite interesting, because they do not have the public support. How many people that drive can get onto the internet? I really don't think the government can continue like this. The extra tax on flights,interest rate rises (what is it now 5.25% and set to go up)and countless other things costing more(gas/elec,etc). I believe their lies, sorry spin is beginning to unravel. People are going to get fed up of paying out.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 21:50 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
ree.t wrote:
This will all be quite interesting, because they do not have the public support. How many people that drive can get onto the internet? I really don't think the government can continue like this. The extra tax on flights,interest rate rises (what is it now 5.25% and set to go up)and countless other things costing more(gas/elec,etc). I believe their lies, sorry spin is beginning to unravel. People are going to get fed up of paying out.


They already are and whilst BBC R4 toes the line.. R2 reflects the true feelings. :wink:

Hoodwinked on NHS delivering..

Hoodwinked on education when latest stats reveal what we've always known .. that these kids cannot add up simple sums or spell anything of more than one syllable. :roll: (each year's medical students who are assigned to me on practicals here.. :yikes: is all I can say here )

Hoodwinked on law and order. As with medicine and teaching . the "increased staff" is not of the calibre or training required and all they can do is assist - usually not to my standard :roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 00:12 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Gizmo wrote:
If it wasn't for "people power" we would still have the poll tax.


at the risk of thread diversion (and before I do that, I'll add that I added my name to the petition 200,000 names or so ago) I have heard it reported that the poll tax was actually extended by the public protests - it was a costly tax to operate and would have been scrapped sooner, but the government would not be seen as pandering to the protests so propped it up for longer than it would have had otherwise.

People Power? Not always a good idea.



On Radio 4 earlier tonight there was a report with soundbites and protests about the rates system that was scrapped to bring in community charge. Seems that the only thing that would make people happy would be to pay nothing.

Mad Moggie wrote:
They already are and whilst BBC R4 toes the line.. R2 reflects the true feelings. :wink:


it isn't quite so cut and dried - post "Gilligan" the today program sometimes seems to hold back a bit where it used to go for the jugular, but I still would not accuse messrs Humpries, Naughtie et al of toeing the line.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 00:38 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Currently 345,410

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax/

If each one of the signers was in a 15 foot ordinary car, bumper to bumper, 352,000 would mean an unbroken 1,000 mile traffic jam.

352,000*15 / 5,280 = 1,000

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 288 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.065s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]