Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Jun 11, 2026 04:43

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 19:04 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
ree.t wrote:
adam.L wrote:

Put Paul, I don't smoke and don't want to smoke any cigarettes a year. I public spaces it should be assumed that the air is clean.

:lol: Depends on what you mean by clean really? Or do you mean just free of smoke from cigarettes?
:roll:
adam.L wrote:
If I am following a car were an occupant is smoking I can smell it. Even if the dangers of passive smoking is over stated, it still makes my clothes stink.


You must be driving close or in a traffic jam. I would be more worried about the fumes coming out the exhaust? CyHz NOx CO and CO2 and all the other particulates. Unburnt hydrocarbons are linked to cancer. Exhaust fumes also are linked to lung/breathing problems. I would consider it dangers for you to fill your car up. Petrol contains Benzene which is a suspected cancer causing chemicals.


I'm not talking about A roads, but in certain situations like a 40 limit driving into a head wind I can still smell the fags of the car in front when travelling at a safe distance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 19:11 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
SafeSpeed wrote:
adam.L wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
The 'passive smoking' science is about as weak as anything I've ever seen. Weaker, if anything, than the 'speed kills' science - unless anyone knows different?

I think the final best estimate was that being a non-smoker, living with a family of smokers, was equivalent to smoking 6 cigarettes per year.

It's just another bandwagon for the 'ban it' crowd.


Put Paul, I don't smoke and don't want to smoke any cigarettes a year. I public spaces it should be assumed that the air is clean. If we have to work in an area where the air has any other contaminant in it the contaminant is either removed or we are given breathing apparatus.

If I am following a car were an occupant is smoking I can smell it. Even if the dangers of passive smoking is over stated, it still makes my clothes stink.


I don't understand why anyone wants to impose their ideals on others - surely we can live together and make room for the habits and desires of others?

I also believe that 'the market' is a good way to get these things sorted out. If people want non-smoking pubs, then the demand will make them. Why do we need anything other than that?


Is it the ideals of a non smoker to not want to breathe secondhand smoke? People choose to smoke.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 19:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
adam L

All I am tiring to say (probably in a crap way :( ) in terms of pollutants breathed in, while driving, or walking around and about cigarettes Probably is not that bad. Yes the smell does permeate, but so does the black crap that comes out of turbo diesels some of you insist on driving :bunker: .(even when driving at a safe distance) :wink:

I find it difficult; while I do not smoke, I believe people have the right to smoke if they want to. I do not particularly like the smell either, but it washes out. Is several ppm of smoke going to damage your car/house/heath that much? If you consider how much crap you breath in as you walk around towns etc.

I don’t like the thought of being spied on while I am going about my business.

It seems to me this country is not as tolerant as it pretends to be. We are allowed to persecute people because they smoke or drive a big car. This tolerant society is bullshit :furious: . We are not allowed to dislike homosexuals (for example :bunker: ),but perfectly entitled to persecute and say quite horrible things about smokers, or someone who has said something that could be considered racist. It amazes me people fail to see the irony in their actions.

Live and let live

:bunker: :D hating homosexuals is only an example I love homosexuals, but not in that way :oops: . Not that is wrong, :shock: if it your personal choice so be it :) :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 20:01 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
adam.L wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
adam.L wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
The 'passive smoking' science is about as weak as anything I've ever seen. Weaker, if anything, than the 'speed kills' science - unless anyone knows different?

I think the final best estimate was that being a non-smoker, living with a family of smokers, was equivalent to smoking 6 cigarettes per year.

It's just another bandwagon for the 'ban it' crowd.


Put Paul, I don't smoke and don't want to smoke any cigarettes a year. I public spaces it should be assumed that the air is clean. If we have to work in an area where the air has any other contaminant in it the contaminant is either removed or we are given breathing apparatus.

If I am following a car were an occupant is smoking I can smell it. Even if the dangers of passive smoking is over stated, it still makes my clothes stink.


I don't understand why anyone wants to impose their ideals on others - surely we can live together and make room for the habits and desires of others?

I also believe that 'the market' is a good way to get these things sorted out. If people want non-smoking pubs, then the demand will make them. Why do we need anything other than that?


Is it the ideals of a non smoker to not want to breathe secondhand smoke? People choose to smoke.


People choose to smoke; people choose not to smoke. What's the difference? They are equally valid choices.

We REALLY need to create a 'live and let live' society, where we try to find a best compromise when peoples' valid choices come into conflict.

What we do NOT need is the Ban It Because I Don't Like It Society.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 20:50 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
I think the problem with smoking is that it can affect other people.
If you do it in your own house with all the windows closed then it's not going to, but if you do it in the middle of a crowd then it will.

I suppose it's a bit like 'muck spreading' on your back garden, it probably won't affect your neighbours health but they might not like the smell. :lol:

I went to a night club once. It seemed to be full of people smoking and they had the doors closed. It took me about a week to be able to breathe properly after that.

I really don't know what to do about it though.

If it is possible to make a device which catches all of the smoke that might be a good idea. Also it could then be 're-breathed' so would presumably save money making each one last longer? And you could get the smoke from both ends.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 21:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
I don't see a law banning smoking. I see a law restricting smoking in certain places. For many years now smoking has been restricted on public transport and aircraft. Now it will be restricted in workplaces. The majority of people do not smoke, so why should they be [effectively] forced to work in any place that is filled with tobacco smoke ?
In reality, they could have prosecuted the smoker for assault if he/she refused to stop smoking if asked...few did.
If somebody asks me for a lift, that's ok. If they then start to smoke and refuse to stop, they walk. Irrespective about your individual beliefs about the harm, or not, of smoking. If the lung capacity of a non smoker is measured before spending a night in the pub [with smokers]and after, it is found that the persons lung capacity is lower after. Whether they are more prone to cancer is hardly the point. They are certainly more prone to bronchitis, which is one of the respiratory diseases classed as Congestive Obstructive Respiratory Disease. These are almost always debilitating and frequently lead to premature death.
The smokers where I work are already saying they'll refuse to pay any attention to the law (21 employees, 6 smokers). Unfortunately for them, it will be the employers responsibility to ensure adherence to law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 23:00 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Unfortunately it's not the law that's the ass - it's the method of enforcement that's bringing the law into disrepute. Article in Sun today (might have been on Clarkson page ) showed the rate of disregard for the law was minimal in Scotland (with few if any council employees involved in enforcement ) ,versus the gearing up of multitudes of English undercover snoops .
Funny that in finance etc , the industry is "self enforcing " ,yet anything like motoring/ smoking/drinking -draconian laws need to be brought in and enforced by countless additional council employees.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 23:57 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 22:31
Posts: 407
Location: A Safe Distance From Others
my neighbour's toilet window is frequently open.

Can I prosecute them for their overly-obnoxious smelling s**t smell that wafts into our bedroom???

Maybe I could ask the council for "curry-cams"???

Simon

_________________
Simon


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 01:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Smoking is a choice, not smoking is a choice.

If you happen to be easily offended by the smell of smoke, and someone nearby is smoking, then move. It is not unreasonable to draw the similarity with some boy-racer who is tailgating you; find yourself a different piece of road.

The problem is that people let their ego get in the way of their true desire. If you want somewhere without smoke, go there. Trying to force someone who is already smoking to leave their space because of you is never going to have an amicable outcome. Be the bigger man and find your own clean air.

Whilst non-smokers might claim to have the right to breath clean air wheresoever they choose to park their breathing apparatus, they probably have no idea of what it is like being addicted to cigarettes. Should not smokers also have the right to not be 'jonesing' in the place where they choose to spend their recreational time?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 02:29 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 23:42
Posts: 620
Location: Colchester, Essex
My 'local' is the Live and Let Live in Stanway, Colchester - one of two pubs in the Country so-named.
The Landlord is building a shelter for smokers outside in preparation for the final ban.
The news of the formation of 'Gordon's Gophers' has triggered a bet as to how far one of these twats could get in the pub, having issued a fixed penalty to a smoker, before they entered the world of pain... The range is 1.5 to 6 metres with the heavy betting on 1.8 to 3.1 metres.
If you want respiratory problems, try walking about four miles along a trunk road used by general traffic. After about three miles, you can smell the sweetness of a petrol engine as it clears the vile diesel from your throat and lungs.
Or, better still, light up a fag - it will do you less harm...

_________________
Aquila



Licat volare si super tergum aquila volat...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 02:44 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
I'm a Ex-smoker, but I gave it up decades ago.......wouldn't light one now if you paid me. I have to say, I walked into a bar in Germany recently and I couldn't see the other side of the room!.... :lol: In the end it got too much for me.

I'm NOT an Anti-smoking fanatic, (I don't like it mind!).....but, What's wrong with the "Smoking Rooms" of old?........


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 07:30 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
I was all in favour of the public places smoking ban - anything that encourages smokers to cut down or, better still, quit altogether is a good thing.

But after reading about Councils' plans to violate peoples' privacy in the name of enforcement, I am 50/50 at best.

If I'm out having a drink with my mistress, I don't want ANYONE taking photos of us and sending copies to my home address as "evidence", thankyou very much. Famous people get paid thousands to put up with that kind of crap. I don't.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:33 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
antera309 wrote:
anything that encourages smokers to cut down or, better still, quit altogether is a good thing.

I'll agree with that, but that then creates another problem.

If everybody in the UK gave up smoking tomorrow, the treasury would lose £9 billion.
One way or another they would have to recoup that, and the only way they could do that would be to hit people with even more taxes in one form or another.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 22:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 20:35
Posts: 75
Location: Lincoln
MGBGT wrote:
My 'local' is the Live and Let Live in Stanway, Colchester - one of two pubs in the Country so-named.
The Landlord is building a shelter for smokers outside in preparation for the final ban.
The news of the formation of 'Gordon's Gophers' has triggered a bet as to how far one of these twats could get in the pub, having issued a fixed penalty to a smoker, before they entered the world of pain... The range is 1.5 to 6 metres with the heavy betting on 1.8 to 3.1 metres.
If you want respiratory problems, try walking about four miles along a trunk road used by general traffic. After about three miles, you can smell the sweetness of a petrol engine as it clears the vile diesel from your throat and lungs.
Or, better still, light up a fag - it will do you less harm...


I thought that was pretty clever, the way you slipped the diesel reference into the thread. Totally irrelevant and unfounded but clever.

_________________
"Experience isn't everything - but it's most of it".

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 23:17 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 23:42
Posts: 620
Location: Colchester, Essex
CzechMate wrote:
MGBGT wrote:
My 'local' is the Live and Let Live in Stanway, Colchester - one of two pubs in the Country so-named.
The Landlord is building a shelter for smokers outside in preparation for the final ban.
The news of the formation of 'Gordon's Gophers' has triggered a bet as to how far one of these twats could get in the pub, having issued a fixed penalty to a smoker, before they entered the world of pain... The range is 1.5 to 6 metres with the heavy betting on 1.8 to 3.1 metres.
If you want respiratory problems, try walking about four miles along a trunk road used by general traffic. After about three miles, you can smell the sweetness of a petrol engine as it clears the vile diesel from your throat and lungs.
Or, better still, light up a fag - it will do you less harm...


I thought that was pretty clever, the way you slipped the diesel reference into the thread. Totally irrelevant and unfounded but clever.


FYI, I did that very walk just over a week ago alongside a traffic jam caused by roadworks lights showing red in both directions for 20 minutes before one of the HiViz-monkeys noticed. Two thirds of the vehicles were powered by paraffin stoves but among them was a Lotus Exige that seemed to offer a 'haven' of sweet-smelling air among the trucks, buses and rep-tile Vectras. As, to the best of my knowledge, Lotus do not make a coal-fired version of the Exige, I have to conclude that my sense of smell was correct.
Furthermore, I also conclude that my snot does not turn black when I spend an hour or two in my local pub as it did walking four miles home that day, so irrelevance and foundation of same is in the eye of the beholder, tovarisch...

_________________
Aquila



Licat volare si super tergum aquila volat...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 01:13 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
Gixxer wrote:
antera309 wrote:
anything that encourages smokers to cut down or, better still, quit altogether is a good thing.

I'll agree with that, but that then creates another problem.

If everybody in the UK gave up smoking tomorrow, the treasury would lose £9 billion.
One way or another they would have to recoup that, and the only way they could do that would be to hit people with even more taxes in one form or another.


Believe me, this has already been anticipated by the Government. I think that tax on alcohol will be upped to compensate - Labour keep coming back to our (apparently brand new) "binge drinking" problem, and I'm certain that this is a ploy to soften us up for big tax hikes on booze.

And then, there's always road pricing.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 08:50 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
MGBGT wrote:
CzechMate wrote:
MGBGT wrote:
My 'local' is the Live and Let Live in Stanway, Colchester - one of two pubs in the Country so-named.
The Landlord is building a shelter for smokers outside in preparation for the final ban.
The news of the formation of 'Gordon's Gophers' has triggered a bet as to how far one of these twats could get in the pub, having issued a fixed penalty to a smoker, before they entered the world of pain... The range is 1.5 to 6 metres with the heavy betting on 1.8 to 3.1 metres.
If you want respiratory problems, try walking about four miles along a trunk road used by general traffic. After about three miles, you can smell the sweetness of a petrol engine as it clears the vile diesel from your throat and lungs.
Or, better still, light up a fag - it will do you less harm...




I thought that was pretty clever, the way you slipped the diesel reference into the thread. Totally irrelevant and unfounded but clever.


FYI, I did that very walk just over a week ago alongside a traffic jam caused by roadworks lights showing red in both directions for 20 minutes before one of the HiViz-monkeys noticed. Two thirds of the vehicles were powered by paraffin stoves but among them was a Lotus Exige that seemed to offer a 'haven' of sweet-smelling air among the trucks, buses and rep-tile Vectras. As, to the best of my knowledge, Lotus do not make a coal-fired version of the Exige, I have to conclude that my sense of smell was correct.
Furthermore, I also conclude that my snot does not turn black when I spend an hour or two in my local pub as it did walking four miles home that day, so irrelevance and foundation of same is in the eye of the beholder, tovarisch...



If you compare petrol to diesel, diesel is a dirty fuel. There are more particulates from diesels. (I also put a reference about dirty diesels)

Me \":D\" \":D\" wrote:
black crap that comes out of turbo diesels some of you insist on driving

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Last edited by ree.t on Fri Feb 23, 2007 10:17, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 09:43 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 07:53
Posts: 460
antera309 wrote:
Gixxer wrote:
antera309 wrote:
anything that encourages smokers to cut down or, better still, quit altogether is a good thing.

I'll agree with that, but that then creates another problem.

If everybody in the UK gave up smoking tomorrow, the treasury would lose £9 billion.
One way or another they would have to recoup that, and the only way they could do that would be to hit people with even more taxes in one form or another.


Believe me, this has already been anticipated by the Government. I think that tax on alcohol will be upped to compensate - Labour keep coming back to our (apparently brand new) "binge drinking" problem, and I'm certain that this is a ploy to soften us up for big tax hikes on booze.

And then, there's always road pricing.



Well, with just over 1300 pubs having closed last year, they may as well ban alchohol as well.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 10:20 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 17:46
Posts: 823
Location: Saltburn, N. Yorks
'Furthermore, I also conclude that my snot does not turn black when I spend an hour or two in my local pub as it did walking four miles home that day, '

Your nose is working well, then? :twisted:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 19:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
MGBGT wrote:
Furthermore, I also conclude that my snot does not turn black when I spend an hour or two in my local pub as it did walking four miles home that day


One of the reasons that I don't want to work in London, apart from the 2 hour commute, obscene ticket prices and having to stand all the way, is that every time I've been there, even if only travelling by train and tube, blowing my nose has been equivalent to emptying half the coal mines in Britain. Yuk.

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.055s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]