We are off to our relative's annual "do" in fortnight. Ist his wedding anniversary. He always has biggest party :
We always look up mobile scam timetables before we set off. We have mentioned before .. will provide link und do cut und paste nearer time

.. but on the timetabled routes .. 2003-2006.. the scammers claimed "400 people died or seriously injured at the site in last 3 years"

We have never been held up und most at that party are medics at the two main hospitals in that area. None were called to a red alert of carnage of hundreds of dead, near dead und walking wounded.
Not one of this family und in-law family was held up in any one year (und he got married longest time ago.. he has one child hopefully qualifying as doctor this year

) for any "incident" either - und we were travelling down from Cumbria, Yorkshire, Durham, Northumberland, Cheshire, Manchester, North und South Wales, London, Hampshire, und Cornwall und Switzerland und Germany.
However, lieber Cooperman.. based on my occasional drives to see "Stray Cat" und my other cousin Klaril based down in East of England .. I think you are right. That A14 seem prone to micro-climate of GROUND FOG which can be very dense at times und fall suddenly too
As you rightly say ...
Cooperman wrote:
Thats right where I live and, Gopher, the sentiments of Mr. Thatcher are absolutely correct. I'm trying to make contact with him to refer him to Paul and to support him in the local press.
It's quite right that virtually all the accidents on that stretch are at relatively low speed and well within the existing speed limit. The problem is the very poor road design and the large number of entry/exit points. These even occur at places where merging traffic is moving from lane 1 to lane 3, exiting traffic is moving from lane 3 to lane 1 and lane 1 ends with the ongoing road being just 3 lanes.
There are also some very strange signs warning that pedestrians may cross this very fast und busy dual carriageway.
Am not "native" to this area .. so I do not know how frequently these pedestrians may NEED to cross this road. But if this road divided a village und caused people to have to cross an NSL down to 50/60 mph dual carriageway .. then the moron behind the design should be shot!

A footbridge or a subway should have been constructed to fulfill this need as much safer than endangering the lives of the pedestrians, cyclists und the drivers und their passengers
Und to place a speed scam at these points und "claim they save lives" ist just blatant self delusion to be kind und fraudulent fining folk to be blunt
I drive according to legal lolly .. und COAST principles ... but even a legal speed would not help if someone was crossing this road und misjudged the speed of the approaching car. The engineering of this road ist seriously flawed .. to criminally negligent boundary.
Why do they not just build a footbridge? It would be cheaper und more of an useful asset than the SPECS und Truvelos which seem favoured on this road.

Ach.. silly me! It not make the cash

oh!
Quote:
Now, in addition to trying to avoid other vehicles, we must watch our average speed as well.
Even doing 60 along there is virtually impossible at peak time. In fact 30 would be good, so what good these cameras are going to do is hard to see. They won't even pay for themselves, let alone make the hoped-for profit the authorities are planning on to pay for them.
They really are a complete waste of OUR cash.
Ach.. in rush hour of course.. We do less than the 20 mph crawl.
But these will of course make loadsamoney in the wee small hours of course.

und off-peak.
Liebchen .. you know as well as we do .. that this will create the big break -even und even beyond profit margins of the business plans
Nothing to do with the safety issues.
Everything to do with making a quick quid's profit off-peak times. I do think my origin earn its keep by just bleeping discreetly to remind me...
I do self-analyse .. I know that this doo-dah ist really my "comfort blanket"

I usually see scam .. know ist there as "LUCRATIVE zone as opposed to DANGER ZONE
I drive to COAST... usually keep to speed limits anyways... but no one can ever claim to be purrrfect .. und any one drive will flux from 4 mph below to 4/5 mph above on average

The bleeps just add the focus to attention und a check-see. As such - a safety device.. as it can "reign in" und keep road user und licence "safe"
But you look at these scams objectively .... the only danger would appear to be the assault on a bank account und wallet
