Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jun 03, 2026 16:26

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 00:41 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Basically I just enjoy conducting a vehicle along a road, even if it's a minibus or whatever.

I'm into advanced driving, so I monitor each braking phase and gearchange.

I am also interested in roads, so I look out for signs and markings. And Gatsos :twisted:

Obviously I strongly dislike sitting in traffic jams, but apart from that I find all driving very stimulating.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 12:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:05
Posts: 22
Gizmo wrote:
Julesm wrote:
IThe only Time I get any sense of satisfaction is when I'm on my Bike, but of coarse us bikers are demon spawn, and must be slowed down for our own safety.


Yep I'm with you on this one.

We can drink ourselves to death
We can smoke ourselves to death
We can eat ourselves to death
We can attempt suicide
All legaly

But when it comes to bikes we are the target fo all the f*ckwit do-gooders. Every now and again they come up with another ill-concieved safety initiative.
Let those who ride decide

Perhaps the difference being that with the first four examples, YOU are the only victim of your life-threatening bad habits. Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 13:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 10:36
Posts: 31
Location: Belfast
:D What I love about driving is the sense of freedom and also Motorway driving. I know it takes extra concentration, but that feeling of speeding at 70mph is really enjoyable.

Last summer I drove on the M6 and the A66 through Cumbria. The A66 is a great road (except for the twisty bits in around Bassenthwaite).

Don't let the anti-car Nazis get the better of you :!: [/quote]


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 14:40 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps the difference being that with the first four examples, YOU are the only victim of your life-threatening bad habits. Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.


Yeah, cos we bikers kill loads of people, unlike tossers in lorries, or stolen cars, or police cars.

Its all a jealousy thing, we can navigate the traffic jams, and leave the highest performance cars eating dust. None of which really fits with the do gooder, safety culture we seem to have adopted.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 20, 2004 22:53 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 00:14
Posts: 535
Location: Victoria, Australia
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps the difference being that with the first four examples, YOU are the only victim of your life-threatening bad habits. Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.

Can you please describe the "life-threatening bad habits" that Julesm is engaged in? I see no examples of anything "life-threatening" in any of his posts, please enlighten me as to how you manage to come to this conclusion.

_________________
Ross

Yes I'm a hoon, but only on the track!!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 15:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:05
Posts: 22
M3RBMW wrote:
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps the difference being that with the first four examples, YOU are the only victim of your life-threatening bad habits. Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.

Can you please describe the "life-threatening bad habits" that Julesm is engaged in? I see no examples of anything "life-threatening" in any of his posts, please enlighten me as to how you manage to come to this conclusion.


Read Julesm's post carefully - HE described the following habits:

We can drink ourselves to death
We can smoke ourselves to death
We can eat ourselves to death
We can attempt suicide
All legaly

They all sound pretty life-threatening to me


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 16:35 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps the difference being that with the first four examples, YOU are the only victim of your life-threatening bad habits. Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.


In general if a biker make a mistake or ignores safety he kills himself.. :?

So what is your point..realy!

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 16:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:05
Posts: 22
Gizmo wrote:
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps the difference being that with the first four examples, YOU are the only victim of your life-threatening bad habits. Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.


In general if a biker make a mistake or ignores safety he kills himself.. :?

So what is your point..realy!

Pillion for starters. Next.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 16:43 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Cleopatra wrote:
Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself


Helmet laws
Seat belt laws
etc etc
Don't think you have realy thought this through have you... :wink:



Cleopatra wrote:
Pillion for starters. Next.


Don't carry one...next!

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2004 17:52 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
Cleopatra wrote:
M3RBMW wrote:
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps the difference being that with the first four examples, YOU are the only victim of your life-threatening bad habits. Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.

Can you please describe the "life-threatening bad habits" that Julesm is engaged in? I see no examples of anything "life-threatening" in any of his posts, please enlighten me as to how you manage to come to this conclusion.


Read Julesm's post carefully - HE described the following habits:

We can drink ourselves to death
We can smoke ourselves to death
We can eat ourselves to death
We can attempt suicide
All legaly

They all sound pretty life-threatening to me


Er, I dont remember doing any such thing.
Keep up.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2004 17:58 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
Cleopatra wrote:
Gizmo wrote:
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps the difference being that with the first four examples, YOU are the only victim of your life-threatening bad habits. Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.


In general if a biker make a mistake or ignores safety he kills himself.. :?

So what is your point..realy!

Pillion for starters. Next.


Most bikers, myself included, ride EXTRA carefully whe carrying a pillion, for the simple reason its not only your life at risk. I dont for instance get my knee down very often with the wife on the back :)

At all times I use skill and judgement to navigate the queens highway without incident, you just give the others tossers a lot more room to make their inevitable mistakes when carrying a pillion. The same tossers who will rarely get caught for speeding, non no, they are WAY to safe for that!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 24, 2004 18:05 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
Cleopatra wrote:
Did you ever consider that laws are there to protect others? After all, nobody really cares what you do to yourself, but involve an innocent party? That's a whole different ball game.


What utter crap. Typical anti car/bike drivel.

So laws are only there to safe gaurd wayward pedestrians and non road tax paying cyclists, and the drivers and riders can go F*** emselves!

Perhaps if as much time was spent educating peds of the dangers of the road then less of them would get hurt.
I would imagine getting hit by a bus doing 30mph is still gonna hurt a bit, so surely the best thing to do is get the peds to stay on the bloody paths, instead of taxing road users for going over a number on a disk! You might save more lives that way. Youll make less money, but save more lives.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 15:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:05
Posts: 22
Julesm wrote:
So laws are only there to safe gaurd wayward pedestrians and non road tax paying cyclists, and the drivers and riders can go F*** emselves!

I'm a cyclist and I pay road tax (VED). Go figure.

Laws should be in the interests of all road users, surely? I have never once implied that laws should protect only peds and cyclists. Your words not mine.

Perhaps less peds would get hurt if motorists were educated on the implications of their driving. (Look how many non-wayward peds were killed or injured on the pavements last year for example.) Works both ways.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 15:19 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps less peds would get hurt if motorists were educated on the implications of their driving.

Sorry...what do you mean by "educated"... :?

Perhaps less peds would get hurt if they were educated on the implecations of their actions.

How many Peds still use the "green cross code" these days.

Think First - Find the safest place to cross then stop.
Stop - Stand on the pavement near the kerb.
Use Your Eyes and Ears - Look all around for traffic, and listen.
Wait Until it's Safe to Cross - If traffic is coming, let it pass.
Look and Listen - When it's safe, walk straight across the road.
Arrive Alive - Keep looking and listening for traffic while you cross.

How many do you see crossing within 50 yds of a pelican or zebra crossing... :evil:

Or do you subscribe to the "motorist is always wrong" philosophy.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 16:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 01:47
Posts: 379
Location: Cumbria / Oxford
Going back to the original question:-

SafeSpeed wrote:
What do you like about driving?

On the face of it a pretty simple (and probably absurd) question, but nevertheless one that I found fairly hard to answer when I was asked earlier today.

I like the following:
  • The sensation of control and mastery. The more precise and far-reaching the control the better. I plan to take control of all the traffic around me too.
  • The usefulness of being able to go anywhere, anytime, in comfort with goods and/or passengers
  • The sensations of cornering and acceleration.
  • The involvement and concentration.
  • I think I enjoy the respite from all of life's other little responsibilities. Because driving is important and immediate, "other stuff" - perhaps like paying bills - is entirely off the menu.
  • It's stimulating to have a constantly changing scene. I enjoy being a passenger in a car and hardly ever become bored. If asked to sit still in an empty room I'd be climbing up the walls with boredom in five minutes flat.


I think you've pretty much covered it as far as I'm concerned, Paul. The sensation of being in control is very much an enjoyable one, especially when controlling something you can sense physically (cornering, acceleration, braking) as well as that control being useful to get you to a destination. I also know what you mean about a changing scene - I used to find car journeys very boring, but now I actually look at what we're going past, or even just watch the other traffic on the road, and can avoid becoming bored.

_________________
-mike[F]
Caught in the rush of the crowd, lost in a wall of sound..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 16:32 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps less peds would get hurt if motorists were educated on the implications of their driving. (Look how many non-wayward peds were killed or injured on the pavements last year for example.) Works both ways.

How many of the pedestrians killed on the pavement were the victims of drunk and/or uninsured drivers? Whenever you read a report of a crash of this type, it always seems to be the fault of someone who isn't driving legally in the first place.

Responsible, licensed, insured drivers don't as a rule do that kind of thing.

Also we need to emphasise the point that all road users carry responsibility both for their own safety and that of others.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 20:00 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:05
Posts: 22
Gizmo wrote:
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps less peds would get hurt if motorists were educated on the implications of their driving.

Sorry...what do you mean by "educated"... :?


Perhaps less peds would get hurt if they were educated on the implecations of their actions..

Er, that was the comment I was responding to (from Jules) :roll:

Gizmo wrote:
How many Peds still use the "green cross code" these days...

I don't know. How many?
Gizmo wrote:
How many do you see crossing within 50 yds of a pelican or zebra crossing... :evil: ..
Many. I also see many crossing where there is no pedestrian crossing in sight. You can't always cross where there is a crossing. WHat are you saying? Use a crossing or be it at your peril?

Gizmo wrote:
Or do you subscribe to the "motorist is always wrong" philosophy.

No. I am not familiar with that philosophy. Amongst other things, I am a motorist. I suspect we share the same views on a great many road safety issues and current practices.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 20:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 11:05
Posts: 22
PeterE wrote:
Cleopatra wrote:
Perhaps less peds would get hurt if motorists were educated on the implications of their driving. (Look how many non-wayward peds were killed or injured on the pavements last year for example.) Works both ways.

How many of the pedestrians killed on the pavement were the victims of drunk and/or uninsured drivers? Whenever you read a report of a crash of this type, it always seems to be the fault of someone who isn't driving legally in the first place.

Responsible, licensed, insured drivers don't as a rule do that kind of thing.

Also we need to emphasise the point that all road users carry responsibility both for their own safety and that of others.


I totally agree


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 20:15 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Cleopatra wrote:
Gizmo wrote:
How many do you see crossing within 50 yds of a pelican or zebra crossing... :evil: ..
Many. I also see many crossing where there is no pedestrian crossing in sight. You can't always cross where there is a crossing. WHat are you saying? Use a crossing or be it at your peril?
How about use a crossing if it's there, and use the green cross code if there isn't? (That said, when I'm pedestrianing I tend to use the gcc at crossings if the traffic is heavy, especially zebras.) How about THINK! ads that remind us all (since we're all pedestrians too) that the first 33 rules in the Highway Code are for pedestrians?

It's not just about drivers taking responsibility for the safety of other road users, which of course they absolutely should. It's also about taking responsibility as individuals for our personal safety, which is something that gets forgotten far too often IMO. Especially around Wimbledon station in the rush hour. :evil:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 11:23 
Offline
Police Officer
Police Officer

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 12:11
Posts: 198
Location: Aberdare
Ummm, I pretty much agree with Paul's comments on why he likes like driving.....um that's it realy :oops:

_________________
'Detritus, get yer stoney arse over ere'


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.035s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]