Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 03:33

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 08:49 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Daily Mail

Quote:
Motorists face a new army of car snoopers
Motorists face being clamped and fined at the roadside by an army of uniformed Government inspectors, it has emerged.

Drivers whose vehicles are judged unroadworthy, have overly tinted windows, lack a valid tax disc or MoT will be subject to being pulled over by examiners from the Vehicle Operator and Services Agency, if new proposals are accepted.

It is planned to give the 560 VOSA inspectors - who wear black uniforms, peaked hats and yellow jackets - powers previously held only by the police to issue fixed penalty fines.

And their workload, which currently focuses on commercial vehicles, will extend to private motorists.

Under the proposals, if they find that a car has already been banned from the road - or believe the driver is likely to ignore the fixed penalty fine - they will have powers to immobilise the vehicle.

But they will not be able to issue speeding tickets and penalty points.

The proposals were outlined yesterday in a consultation document which the Department of Transport said was aimed mainly at cracking down on lorries from abroad which flout UK laws with impunity. But the proposals have fuelled concern about the growing numbers of uniformed civilian agencies being given powers that were once the preserve of the police.

Edmund King of the RAC Foundation said: 'Our major worry is this growing army of uniformed bureaucrats.

"We now have decriminalised parking with private-sector parking wardens. On the motorways the Highways Agency have been given police- style powers to direct traffic. Now we have VOSA issuing fixed penalties.

"We are not against targeting rogue lorries. But vulnerable motorists such as lone women are being flagged down by uniformed people who are not police.

"This dilution of powers makes it difficult for drivers to tell if they should or shouldn't stop when flagged down. We think VOSA's powers to issue fixed penalty notices should be restricted only to lorries, not cars."

The consultation document notes: "The Road Safety Act will amend the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (RTOA) to give VOSA vehicle examiners equivalent powers to those already vested in the police to issue fixed penalty notices."

The Department of Transport said the changes would speed up enforcement and free up the courts. It added: "The current fixed penalty scheme administered by the police has resulted in considerable savings in time."

VOSA estimates that of the 13,500 cases it pursued through the courts in 2005, around 90 per cent could have been dealt with by fixed penalty.

A Transport Department spokesman said: "VOSA already have the power to stop non-commercial drivers, although their work is aimed at commercial vehicles so this rarely occurs.

"Currently if a VOSA examiner does stop a non- commercial vehicle, the examiner can only enforce by taking the offence to court. Under the new measures the examiner would be able to issue a fixed penalty notice."

Foreign lorry drivers will also be hit with on-the-spot fines to stop them flouting UK traffic laws.

Roads Minister Stephen Ladyman said: "This is about making our roads safer and creating a level playing field across Europe."

In another move, ministers are planning a graduated system of penalty points for speeders, with fewer points for drivers just over the limit, but more for those well over it.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 08:55 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Quote:
... or believe the driver is likely to ignore the fixed penalty fine ...

Going to employ psychics are they?

Quote:
Currently if a VOSA examiner does stop a non- commercial vehicle, the examiner can only enforce by taking the offence to court. Under the new measures the examiner would be able to issue a fixed penalty notice.

So, guilty until proven innocent on the opinion of an official.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:41 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:52
Posts: 947
Location: falkirk
Dixie wrote:

"This dilution of powers makes it difficult for drivers to tell if they should or shouldn't stop when flagged down. We think VOSA's powers to issue fixed penalty notices should be restricted only to lorries, not cars."



great idea. instead of a single car being stolen, give them far bigger and more dangerous vehicles to steal :roll:

VOSA do currently have the authority to stop a truck anywhere but not all truckers will stop for them. i certainly wont. criminals have posed as police officers in the past so surely this is easier to copy and lower risk should they be stopped before committing a crime. its blues and twos that stop me, nothing else

_________________
Richie

SSAFA supporter
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126025031585


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 15:05 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Dixie wrote:
The Department of Transport said the changes would speed up enforcement and free up the courts. It added: "The current fixed penalty scheme administered by the police has resulted in considerable savings in time."


This is like emptying your toilet out of the window to 'free up' the drain. The courts shouldn't be 'freed up'; they're there to be used. If they no longer want the safeguard of a court appearance before conviction, why not propose to abolish the courts completely and run for the next election on that proposal? If the courts are such a waste of everyone's time as they would have us think?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 16:00 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Zamzara wrote:
why not propose to abolish the courts completely and run for the next election on that proposal? If the courts are such a waste of everyone's time as they would have us think?


We couldn't have that though could we, where would people employed in such positions get their income from?

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 19:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Dixie wrote:
Zamzara wrote:
why not propose to abolish the courts completely and run for the next election on that proposal? If the courts are such a waste of everyone's time as they would have us think?


We couldn't have that though could we, where would people employed in such positions get their income from?


Errr...they would be employed by the higways agency or vosa. How else can unemployment be kept down ?
So, what happened to only having to stop for a uniformed police officer ?
And how long until the first robbery (or worse) by some crook in a vosa uniform ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 21:11 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 21:24
Posts: 103
only a Court of Law can ever issue a fine or Forfeiture, AFTER Conviction, simple as and always has been

why do Folks put up with this S**t?

it' no wonder some people flip and do a Michael Ryan is it?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 13:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
Dixie wrote:
Zamzara wrote:
why not propose to abolish the courts completely and run for the next election on that proposal? If the courts are such a waste of everyone's time as they would have us think?


We couldn't have that though could we, where would people employed in such positions get their income from?


Unemployment is now as high as it was in 1979, the year Margaret Thatcher stormed into power, but no one seems to care. Wonder why?

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 13:31 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
Dixie wrote:
Zamzara wrote:
why not propose to abolish the courts completely and run for the next election on that proposal? If the courts are such a waste of everyone's time as they would have us think?


We couldn't have that though could we, where would people employed in such positions get their income from?

From that other industry of wasters - in the Civil Service or LA employ...

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 14:09 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
j.prescott wrote:
only a Court of Law can ever issue a fine or Forfeiture, AFTER Conviction, simple as and always has been

why do Folks put up with this S**t?

it' no wonder some people flip and do a Michael Ryan is it?


Because most people don't know any better. Most people still labour under the misconception that the government is there for good, never tells lies and never tries to cheat people...

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 05:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Quote:
The Department of Transport said the changes would speed up enforcement...

Speed is good? :twisted:

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 20:07 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: Check out this pdf file. The panel on the bottom right really makes my blood boil :furious: With all the powers that they'll have it's only a matter of time before these jumped-up clipboard jobsworths really infuriate decent motorists. With the LA's and the Government's obession with "targets" it bound to happen that these officials abuse their authority. You could be fined for the least little thing. Personally, if one of them stops me and asks for my driving and vehicle documents, I'll just reply, "Find me a police officer first." I fully understand Scanny77's post about bogus inspectors and the threat of HGV's being hijacked. That could spread to private vehicles.

From now on, I'm keeping a camcorder in my car in case I encounter one of these jobsworths. If they object to that... TOO BAD! :twisted:

http://www.roadsafetyni.gov.uk/doenewlaws.pdf

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:56 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
So, how does being an apparently uniformed police officer make a difference ?
You can print your own card and nobody [except the police, maybe] would know the difference.
You can buy a uniform.
I think the best idea is to accept that a guy identifying as a police officer, in a uniform, with a marked police vehicle and showing correct id, MAY BE a police officer ?
Everyone else is a chancer or worse, a government jobsworth and a social leper.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 19:55 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: I will refuse to recognise the authority of these so-called vehicle inspectors. Not only that, will we all have to keep vehicle and licensing documentation with at all times so they can be presented on demand to one of these jobsworths? As if I'd want to permanently keep vehicle documentation in my car. What if my car is broken into or nicked. That'll be a handy present for the thieves, won't it?

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 22:04 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
:bunker: you won't have to cos you will have your ID card soon! silly! :bunker: :lol:

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 16:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
jomukuk wrote:
Dixie wrote:
Zamzara wrote:
why not propose to abolish the courts completely and run for the next election on that proposal? If the courts are such a waste of everyone's time as they would have us think?


We couldn't have that though could we, where would people employed in such positions get their income from?


Errr...they would be employed by the higways agency or vosa. How else can unemployment be kept down ?
So, what happened to only having to stop for a uniformed police officer ?
And how long until the first robbery (or worse) by some crook in a vosa uniform ?


It has already happened.
BBC News

Quote:
Trial over £53m cash heist starts

Seven men and one woman are in the dock at the Old Bailey
The trial of eight people accused of involvement in the UK's biggest cash robbery has begun at the Old Bailey.
Seven men and one woman face charges in relation to the £53m raid on the Securitas depot in Tonbridge, Kent, last February.

Seven people deny conspiracy to rob, conspiracy to kidnap, and conspiracy to possess firearms. One person denies handling stolen money.

Prosecution barrister Sir John Nutting QC has outlined the case to the jury.

The trial is expected to last up to five months.

He was interrogated about the depot and about its security arrangements by men armed with guns

Sir John Nutting

The gang used what appeared to be a police car and theatrical disguises to waylay Colin Dixon, the manager of the Securitas depot, stopping his car as he drove home, Sir John said.

"Mr Dixon was then taken at gunpoint to an isolated farm where he was interrogated about the depot and about its security arrangements by men armed with guns," he said.

He told jurors "a cruel ruse" was used to take Mr Dixon's wife, Lynn, and their young child from their Herne Bay home.

He said "policemen" told them Mr Dixon was in hospital after a car crash and offered to take them there.

'Held separately'

"Distracted by anxiety", Mrs Dixon left for her husband's bedside "with those whom she believed to be sympathetic and kindly policemen", Sir John said.

But when they were in the car, guns were produced, he said.

"For much of the time, they were held separately, and were ignorant of each other's fate."

Car dealer John Fowler, 58, of Elderden Farm, Chart Hill Road, Staplehurst, Kent; car salesman Stuart Royle, 48, of Allen Street, Maidstone, Kent; unemployed Jetmir Bucpapa, 26, of Hadlow Road, Tonbridge, Kent; and roofer Lea Rusha, 35, of Lambersart Close, Southborough, Kent, all deny conspiracy to rob.

Hairdresser Michelle Louise Hogg, 32, of Brinklow Crescent, Woolwich, south-east London; garage owner Roger Coutts, 30, of The Green, Welling, south-east London and Ermir Hysenaj, 27, a Post Office worker of New Road, Crowborough, East Sussex, also deny conspiracy to rob.

The seven have also pleaded not guilty to conspiracy to kidnap Securitas employee Colin Dixon, his wife and son, and conspiracy to possess firearms.

Signwriter Keith Borer, 53, of Hempstead Lane, Maidstone, Kent, denies handling stolen money.

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 136 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.094s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]