Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 00:38

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 15:31 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
http://www.autoindustry.co.uk/news/today#25-06-07_19
Quote:
The European Parliament’s Environment Committee will this week discuss UK Liberal MEP Chris Davies’ proposals to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger vehicles. In a draft non-legislative report to the European Parliament’s Environment Committee, Davies proposes a system of financial rewards for manufacturers which meet a binding CO2 emissions reduction targets, while those that fail to do so would be fined.

In line with the ACEA'a stance on planned legislation, Davies advocates giving manufacturers more lead-time than the European Commission’s proposed 2012 deadline for new cars to reach an average of 120 g/km, but wants more ambitious longer-term targets. Other recommendations include limiting the top speed of all cars to 100 mph by 2013.

(www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_20 ... 0834en.pdf)


_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 15:53 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 18:17
Posts: 794
Location: Reading
Presumably by 2013 they hope to have "persuaded" Germany to put speed limits on its "bloodbath" autobahns. Otherwise it would surely be a human rights issue there, and as long as they're available there, the authorities will have to try pretty hard to stop people importing them if necessary.

I'd like to see figures that show how many crashes have been caused by vehicles travelling above 100mph. I don't ever recall reading or hearing about one where no other offence was being committed.

Just another half-baked kneejerk simplistic load of bollocks.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 17:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
There's no need for any private vehicle to have a top speed of >100mph.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 17:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
mpaton2004 wrote:
There's no need for any private vehicle to have a top speed of >100mph.

why not? I was in Wales and driving at well over 100mph the weekend before last and amazingly no kittens were killed as a result.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 17:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
mpaton2004 wrote:
There's no need for any private vehicle to have a top speed of >100mph.

There most certainly is when I'm competing in RWYB on the strip.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 17:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
mpaton2004 wrote:
There's no need for any private vehicle to have a top speed of >100mph.


Should our lives only involve items that are needed? :(

You limit yourself like that if you wish, but don't include the rest of us in your miserable regime.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 17:46 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
TripleS wrote:
mpaton2004 wrote:
There's no need for any private vehicle to have a top speed of >100mph.


Should our lives only involve items that are needed? :(

You limit yourself like that if you wish, but don't include the rest of us in your miserable regime.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


:yesyes:

While we are there lets just have one brand of car, what do we need so many for?

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 17:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 22:23
Posts: 303
mpaton2004 wrote:
There's no need for any private vehicle to have a top speed of >100mph.


In that case why stop at private vehicles?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 18:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Groan.

This is a re-run of a previous thread. Please stop now before we all lose the will to live. :)

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewt ... sc&start=0

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Last edited by malcolmw on Mon Jun 25, 2007 18:19, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 18:14 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
mpaton2004 wrote:
There's no need for any private vehicle to have a top speed of >100mph.


HOY- next thing - only those with friends with villas in sun can have holiday abroad - provided they travel in some sanpan --wind propelled ,and eating lentils.

Be carefull what you wish for mpaton - unless you're wearing tin pants -it could return to savage your rear end.

:roll:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 19:59 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
All this does is prove beyond reasonable doubt that none of you are interested in road safety, just the fact that you are no longer able to drive at eye-watering speeds on public roads due to the proliferation of safety cameras.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 20:13 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
mpaton2004 wrote:
just the fact that you are no longer able to drive at eye-watering speeds on public roads due to the proliferation of safety cameras.

who said anything about public roads? Plonker.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 20:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 22:23
Posts: 303
mpaton2004 wrote:
All this does is prove beyond reasonable doubt that none of you are interested in road safety, just the fact that you are no longer able to drive at eye-watering speeds on public roads due to the proliferation of safety cameras.


How is that then?


Quote:
In that case why stop at private vehicles?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 00:16 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
As has been said, we've done this before but as it's here, I think it's interesting to see how everyone seems to have assumed it's for safety reasons whereas, in fact, it's supposedly do do with environmental reasons.

Also as said before, it's utter bunkum because I bet the amount of CO2 emitted at present by cars doing over 100MPH on UK roads is already in the single numbers of tonnes. Until the right honourable member for Head-up-his-own-arseville can give me figures for the amount of CO2 that is (a) currently produced by vehicles exceeding the 'ton and (b) credible estimates of how much can be saved, I don't think his proposal is even worth reading.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 05:37 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 18:17
Posts: 794
Location: Reading
mpaton2004 wrote:
All this does is prove beyond reasonable doubt that none of you are interested in road safety, just the fact that you are no longer able to drive at eye-watering speeds on public roads due to the proliferation of safety cameras.

You're absolutely correct, that's what it's all about. We don't care about our own lives, those of our families or those of our fellow road users.

You've "developed" into a full-blown troll and for the first time I wish phpBB had a killfile option.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 06:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
mpaton2004 wrote:
All this does is prove beyond reasonable doubt that none of you are interested in road safety, just the fact that you are no longer able to drive at eye-watering speeds on public roads due to the proliferation of safety cameras.

What on earth makes you think I would even consider using a public road as my own little practice strip?

When you've finished with the assumptions, is there any chance of having your dealers name & address because that is obviously some good crack you are getting.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:00 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
bombus wrote:
You've "developed" into a full-blown troll and for the first time I wish phpBB had a killfile option.

There is one in the next release - phpBB 3.0 - which is now available in beta format.

However the problem is that you can still see there's a post by "spindrift" or whoever, and you can't help wondering what the **** has been saying now :roll:

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
Gixxer wrote:
What on earth makes you think I would even consider using a public road as my own little practice strip?


Don't delude yourself.... :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 13:03 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
The debate is verging on ad hominem. Please keep it civil, don't fan the flames.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 13:04 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
Gixxer wrote:
mpaton2004 wrote:
All this does is prove beyond reasonable doubt that none of you are interested in road safety, just the fact that you are no longer able to drive at eye-watering speeds on public roads due to the proliferation of safety cameras.

What on earth makes you think I would even consider using a public road as my own little practice strip?

When you've finished with the assumptions, is there any chance of having your dealers name & address because that is obviously some good crack you are getting.

:rotfl:

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 155 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.034s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]