Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 09, 2026 12:17

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 14:57 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/arti ... 20Standard

Humps out, cameras in
By Ben Leapman, Evening Standard Political Reporter
15 April 2004

Drivers are facing an explosion of speed cameras in London, a leaked Labour document reveals today.

Secret plans would see hundreds of cameras fitted in quiet streets around the capital.

They would replace speed humps, which are seen as an inconvenience for law-abiding motorists, and would be used to enforce a new lower speed limit of 20mph for all London residential zones. Extra cameras could also be installed along main roads.

The measures would raise thousands of pounds in extra fines. But motoring groups warned that cameras on side streets could be opposed by residents.

The proposals are set to form a central plank of Ken Livingstone's mayoral re-election manifesto after they were included in a policy paper prepared in private by Labour members of the London Assembly.

They fly in the face of government pol icy, which restricts cameras to proven accident blackspots.

However, there were separate reports this week that ministers may water down the rules by allowing some cameras to be installed on roads where there have been no serious accidents.

London already has 400 speed cameras, with more than 6,000 across Britain. Mr Livingstone called this year for more cameras "in every residential neighbourhood" to enforce speed limits.

The inclusion of the idea in the Labour Assembly group paper means it is almost certain to become party policy.

The document, Labour's Agenda 2004-2008, states: "The use of well designed and placed road humps remains a useful tool in improving road safety, but in the long term we support a move towards camera-based enforcement of speed limits.

"We will investigate the feasibility of introducing additional speed cameras on main roads and at junctions. Labour will support a reduction of the speed limit in residential areas, and around schools and hospitals, to 20mph."

Emergency services would welcome the removal of speed humps. However, motorists may feel the new cameras are a money-making scheme not linked to road safety.

Other proposals likely to feature in the Mayor's manifesto include free bus travel for under-18s and cheap bus fares for jobseekers.

The congestion charge would be expanded westwards, but only "after full public consultation".


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 16, 2004 01:11 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
For some reason I always smile when I see the phrase 'central plank' mentioned in the same sentence as 'Ken Livingstone'. :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2004 10:30 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 02:07
Posts: 242
They say "residential areas". In London, most roads are residential, including primary routes.

Are they suggesting that they have 20mph speed limits on every road?

Though at busy times, even the ability to go at 20mph can be a luxury and I don't think you can keep people off the smaller roads simply by those means. No - the main roads need to be improved. And they should start with the primaries.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 251 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.062s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]