Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon May 13, 2024 06:34

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 23:00 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 11:07
Posts: 53
Hi there, I'm 17 years old and based in North Wales.

North Wales...exactly. I currently (touch wood) have no points on my licence, but I daily come accross Talivans parked round corners/idden in dustbins etc. Therefore, I am constantly look at my speedo, more than my mirrors.

I have a habit of driving exactly to the speed limit. I often feel imtimidated at times, because I am quite obviously going to slow for the road conditions. However, I AM sticking to the speed limit.

It was only until the other day when I took my dad in the car with me when he said that I was going far too fast on the corners and on certain roads.

My Response..... "But I'm not speeding"
Now I know that speed doesnt kill, unsafe driving does. However I belive I have been brainwashed into driving at the speed limit and constantly looking at my speedometer.

What do I do?

Do I drive safely, looking for hazards, children etc? - Therefore risking a fine and points on my licence... which at my age, would cost me hundreds in increased insurance premiums.

Or do I do as I'm doing now and constantly look at my speedoeter, oblivous to the road conditions and hazard perception?

Not that I intend to do thses faults, but I am a human being, I can only put a major concentration at one thing at a time. At the moment, it's my speedometer, ensuring I never go to the "dangerous" speed of 35 in a 30.

Quite clearly this fear of speed traps are making my driving unsafe, and im constantly trying to control my speed at the expensive of that extra 20-30% on hazard perception/ assesing the correct TRUE speed for road conditons.

Obviously the government / Richard Brunstrom dont care about my safety and others, as long as they are able to fine me. So I hope sensible people can advice me on this forum.


Oh, and a big shout out to Paul Smith - Legend! If I was PM, I'd appoint you head of motoring!

:D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 00:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
Regrettably one of the consequences of the indiscriminate use of speed cameras is to make drivers stick to the speed limit, which they then tend to do even where it may be inappropriate, but the speed cameras don’t know that and there are no police patrols to worry about.

If you are prevented from driving at a perfectly safe speed for the conditions, if over the prescribed limit, then the temptation is to make up for this in other ways, such as harsher braking, acceleration and cornering, for which there are no prescribed limits and as yet no cameras which can measure these things.

Hence it is little wonder that speed cameras are not bringing about any reduction in road accidents, casualties and fatalities.

The problem is that if you can never go faster than 70mph, whatever the circumstances, then this prevent drivers gaining experience about the handling of their vehicle, unless you are PC Milton, then you can do 150mph.
.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 07:49 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
From when I joined

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewt ... highlight=

it may help

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 08:22 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
camerasaremoneyspinners wrote:
What do I do?

Do I drive safely, looking for hazards, children etc? - Therefore risking a fine and points on my licence... which at my age, would cost me hundreds in increased insurance premiums.

Or do I do as I'm doing now and constantly look at my speedoeter, oblivous to the road conditions and hazard perception?


i think you really know the answer to that one!

as you gain experience you should find that knowing, and holding a speed shouldn't have to involvestaring at the speedo constantly.

in a fixed gear the engine note is directly related to road speed so a quick glance at the speedo, adjustment of speed check again then holding the revs roughly constant should keep your speed about right.

i do find it pefectly possible to drive at a speed suitable to the conditions & hazards, with that speed being capped by the signed limit for that road (or some interpretation thereof :wink: )


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:04 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 13:41
Posts: 514
Location: Thames Valley
Start saving and get RoadAngelPlus™ from http://www.blackspot.com/products/roada ... index.html - best £300 I ever spent, now down to £250.

Read my thread about it - http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15369

DieselMoment - No accidents in over 30 years, and no penalty points - ever.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 12:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
Take some advanced driving tuition which will enable you to 'multi-task' with your driving and be more conscious of what is happening by improvements to your 'spacial awareness' whilst still complying with the law. Don't worry, you'll find that these skills can be developed relatively easily so long as you have the aptitude. In flying, where speed near to the ground is so critical, pilots still manage to line up with the runway, control rate of descent, allow for crosswinds, speak to ATC, operate flaps, operate throttle, control attitude (in 3 planes), watch for hazards and keep the airspeed at the correct figure during approach. This is achieved through training. Driving is nowhere near as difficult really, it's just training and practice you need.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 12:57 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 14:06
Posts: 48
cooperman - I've never seen a kid run out into the path of a plane landing at an airport or be cut up by the pilot behind him.

most modern jets and even light aircraft have flight path guides and warnings - so the pilot is actually able to cut the amount he has to concentrate on - ultimately the bulk of flights are commercial flights that have auto pilot and landing systems - something we're a long way from on the road. So the comparison and comments on multi tasking are a bit wide of the mark.

the difference with a pilot is that there is that if he didnt make the grade he wouldnt be flying - plus they are constantly evaluated/retested and have to get re-tested on new aircraft.

Unlike on the roads when you have such a wide range of qualities and a fairly low level "pass" to get on the roads. So again comparison is apples and potatoes. In the air we can guarantee a high minimum level of pilot skill and experience - not so on the roads...

You've stated driving is nowhere near as difficult as flying - with all the aid devices I'd have to say this is wrong. If you compare a drive through Paris or London at rush hour - then you'll have to make far more judgements and deal with far more than a pilot flying aberdeen to london over a similar 2hr period.

Ultimately the govt dont want us to multitask in the car - as they would rather you didnt use a mobile - all be it the non handsfree type - but whats the diff


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 12:58 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 14:06
Posts: 48
the iam isnt going to give you the skills - just point out what you can do.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 13:18 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
Cooperman wrote:
[...]control attitude (in 3 planes)[...]
Yeah, I'd like to be able to control the driver attitudes of multiple vehicles too!

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 13:21 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
peegee wrote:
the iam isnt going to give you the skills - just point out what you can do.
What's the problem with the IAM?

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 15:07 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
DieselMoment wrote:
Start saving and get RoadAngelPlus™ from http://www.blackspot.com/products/roada ... index.html - best £300 I ever spent, now down to £250.


i hesitate to say it, but i disagree here.
something for a dfferent thread perhaps.

but i wouldn't like to encourage anyone to rely on these gadgets.
i find them distracting and annoying in the extreme (and thats when i'm not trying to drive).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 15:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
What further idiocy is this?!

peegee wrote:
cooperman - I've never seen a kid run out into the path of a plane landing at an airport or be cut up by the pilot behind him.


Have you ever heard of a birdstrike? No, I'm not referring the the Falcons' Union!

peegee wrote:
most modern jets and even light aircraft have flight path guides and warnings - so the pilot is actually able to cut the amount he has to concentrate on - ultimately the bulk of flights are commercial flights that have auto pilot and landing systems - something we're a long way from on the road. So the comparison and comments on multi tasking are a bit wide of the mark.


What on earth are you wittering on about? Light aircraft 'flight path guides'?! There's no control in the open FIR, and VFR is see and avoid! The bulk of flights are not commercial flights.

peegee wrote:
You've stated driving is nowhere near as difficult as flying - with all the aid devices I'd have to say this is wrong. If you compare a drive through Paris or London at rush hour - then you'll have to make far more judgements and deal with far more than a pilot flying aberdeen to london over a similar 2hr period.


It seems you have garnered all your vast knowledge of aviation from MS Flight Sim, and are thus somewhat deficient in your understanding, again!

So take driving, two dimensions of freedom and any threat coming at you will be in visual distance and on the same plane as you. Take flying, three dimensions, a mental picture of the situation must be built up comprehensively around the aircraft, largely from positions of other aircraft passed via the radio, since you haven't got full spherical lookout, and threats can appear too late to be mitigated. You're also trying to follow a route on a chart, avoid the ground, tune radios and talk to the relevant agencies, all whilst flying the aircraft accurately.

To the original poster, do investigate advanced instruction, and if you feel like it, also learn to fly, you'll find your capacity stretched and expanded no end, to the point where you can quite happily cope with rush hour in a european capital city, or even manage to choose the correct lane to drive in, which others here seem incapable of!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 15:56 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Also, a driver can simply do an emergency stop......


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 16:16 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
smeggy wrote:
Also, a driver can simply do an emergency stop......


So can I :wink: :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 17:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
ed_m wrote:
DieselMoment wrote:
Start saving and get RoadAngelPlus™ from http://www.blackspot.com/products/roada ... index.html - best £300 I ever spent, now down to £250.


i hesitate to say it, but i disagree here.
something for a dfferent thread perhaps.

but i wouldn't like to encourage anyone to rely on these gadgets.
i find them distracting and annoying in the extreme (and thats when i'm not trying to drive).


I don't know, I got a road angel when I first started driving. Now I barely use it. I found it helped me focus on other things rather than the cams.
Having your speed in the windscreen, helps too.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 19:40 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 22:56
Posts: 88
:lol: :lol: :lol:

1) SPEED KILLS, you have no epierience but make silly statements about speed limits.

Grow up You really thought that you needed to travell at the posted speed !!!!!

You will NOT have an acident by loking at the speedo occasionally and more than looking in the mirrors, (*thats the rear view mirrors not the ones that are there to check wether you ae hansome, belive me you are, you dont get ugly til the age of 40)

REMEMBER: A car is as leathal as a loaded gun, at 17 all the fun in a car ought to be when it is PARKED IN A COUNTRY LANE! :wink: :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 19:48 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
safetyman wrote:
1) SPEED KILLS,

You keep repeating that, yet not once have you justified it. Care to do it now?

safetyman wrote:
You will NOT have an acident by loking at the speedo occasionally and more than looking in the mirrors,

Do you remember that old advert for seatbelts where the driver was looking in the rear view mirror at a following van, only to crash into another car; would you say that was an unrealistic situation?

Furthermore, there is a difference between looking at the mirrors and looking at the speedo. With mirrors you don’t have to cross your eyes and refocus; you do with the speedo!

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 20:18 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
safetyman wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

1) SPEED KILLS, you have no epierience but make silly statements about speed limits.

Grow up You really thought that you needed to travell at the posted speed !!!!!

You will NOT have an acident by loking at the speedo occasionally and more than looking in the mirrors, (*thats the rear view mirrors not the ones that are there to check wether you ae hansome, belive me you are, you dont get ugly til the age of 40)

REMEMBER: A car is as leathal as a loaded gun, at 17 all the fun in a car ought to be when it is PARKED IN A COUNTRY LANE! :wink: :wink:



Nice, someone come for advice, and intelligent discussion and they get you acting like a child. I think it is you who needs to grow up.
He/she is 17 don’t talk to him/herif as if he/she is five. He/she may not have much experience, however he/she does have some, and he/she is just as much right to discuss their experience as you! At least the post has
clearly had some thought put into it. Instead of one which a appears to be the gibbering of a lunatic.
Also the OP show that they are THINKING about what they are doing.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 20:34 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 13:41
Posts: 514
Location: Thames Valley
ed_m wrote:
DieselMoment wrote:
Start saving and get RoadAngelPlus™ from http://www.blackspot.com/products/roada ... index.html - best £300 I ever spent, now down to £250.


i hesitate to say it, but i disagree here.
something for a dfferent thread perhaps.

but i wouldn't like to encourage anyone to rely on these gadgets.
i find them distracting and annoying in the extreme (and thats when i'm not trying to drive).


It's certainly not a carte blanche to speed with impunity, but it's a most useful passenger to have along for the ride.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 21:57 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
smeggy wrote:
Do you remember that old advert for seatbelts where the driver was looking in the rear view mirror at a following van, only to crash into another car...


That was 'Julie':
Image

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.015s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]