Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue May 12, 2026 22:04

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 22:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
smeggy wrote:
but it sure as hell won’t last over the length of the junction – unlike a car.


It lasts long enough for the cyclist to get out of the way.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 22:43 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
weepej wrote:
smeggy wrote:
but it sure as hell won’t last over the length of the junction – unlike a car.


It lasts long enough for the cyclist to get out of the way.

But not over the length of the junction, not if both the driver and cyclist set off at the same time :nono:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 23:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Cyclists never get in my way at advanced stop lines. They just go straight through the red lights. :D

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 09:05 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
Lights make sense. I have lights on my car. The dipped headlights show up the road ahead of me .. including potholes. :banghead: They also tell another road user I am there on the road with them. I can be seen. They can see me. I can see them .. including the cyclist - but the one who in dark clothes/no lights ist not immediately visible until my dipped lights close in on him. This to me does not give me as much warning of his presence as the one with the lights or reflector und all it need ist some foliage or a pothole he not see for him to have wobble.

I use a light on my bicycle. I can be seen. I can see them. Most importantly the Lupines on my bicycle show up the road ahead of me. This means I can see the dips in the roads.. the potholes, man holes, debris, ice or whatever on road surface on the road ahead of me. It also mean I can see pedestrians, sheep, cattle straying around here too. :wink:

Lights are not a whim of the Road Traffic Act of 1988 nor a whim of the Highway Codes across the world. They SAFETY und COURTESY to other people und I will actively urge any policeman to enforce this without any discretion too. :furious:

I have never read such apparent daftness as posting up courtesy rules of the Highway Code (old version) in one breath und claiming in next that a driver has to see a cyclist who cannot be bothered to reciprocate such courtesy in the next :banghead: Think I read this on page 2. Cannot recall who posted this - but he must be a right muppet if he really think that. :banghead:

Common sense .. pure und simple. Story end of. Light up lycra clad guys und gals!. Care not if you look like a "Christmas tree". We need such trees to brighten up horrid winter months anyway :lol: I would rather have a lit up "tree" than a tree hugger anyway. They have such colour :lol:

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 17:46
Posts: 823
Location: Saltburn, N. Yorks
malcolmw wrote:-

Quote:
Cyclists never get in my way at advanced stop lines. They just go straight through the red lights. Very Happy


My experience too! :cry:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 14:33
Posts: 186
Location: Norfolk
weepej wrote:
Assertion that cars move off lights quicker than cycles do, I could only presume it was impatience on Paul_1966's part, apologies.


No, not impatience I assure you. I just don't see the logic in a traffic scheme which deliberately brings the slower vehicles to the front of the line.

Several of these have appeared in Norwich over the last few years. Most of the time they're of no significance anyway since so few bicycles seem to be around, but when several cyclists do appear in these advance boxes, the result is less than desirable. Maybe it's just the particular spacing and layout on these junctions, but what I've observed happening is that either the cars have to hold back to follow the bikes, or if the cars are a little slower off the mark they meet up with the bikes just on the far side of the intersection where the road narrows down and there are islands. Either way, it does nothing to improve traffic flow.

Great Yarmouth also has some diabolical cycle lanes which run for 100 yards then disappear, start again 50 yards further odd run for about 25 yards then stop again, etc. There's one stretch of road which has been marked with cycle lanes both sides, but they are ridiculously narrow, and the lane widths left for motor vehicles are now so small than anything larger than a sub-compact has to straddle the bicycle lane anyway.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 14:33
Posts: 186
Location: Norfolk
Mad Moggie wrote:
The idea behind is that the cyclist gets poll position.. seen and not in danger from the muppet who tried to turn left as they are pedalling to go straight on.


Conversely, there are also some kamikazi cyclists who try to push their way down a narrow gap between the curb and a car, even when said car has its left signal flashing.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 14:28 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
weepej wrote:
BottyBurp wrote:
Ummmm, no. I'd say the cyclist is 100% at fault.


Riiiight.

So what if the driver hits a fallen tree, pedestrian, animal or other obstacle in the road that they didn't see in time because they were driving outside the limits of their headlight beam?

Who's fault is it then?

IMHO, a fallen tree or animal or other obstacle has no obligations to make itself known to other road users. However, ALL people (road-users) do have this obligation, both to themselves and other road-users.

And you should only be travelling at a speed where you can stop on your own side of the road within the distance you can see to be clear, otherwise known as an appropriate speed for the conditions.

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 259 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.092s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]