Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Nov 12, 2025 12:44

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:34 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 13:41
Posts: 514
Location: Thames Valley
Well, I'm glad I didn't rush out and buy a speed camera detection device, in light of the proposed ban that I read about in yesterday's Daily Telegraph.

I notice the proposed ban does not extend to GPS equipment. Presumably the activities of the companies operating the databases will be outlawed, thus rendering GPS based kit useless.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... peed17.xml


Quote:
Ban proposed on speed camera detectors
By Paul Marston
(Filed: 17/01/2005)

More than half a million drivers will have to throw away speed camera warning devices or face a fine if a Government ban goes ahead.

Demand for in-car detectors had soared in the past two years as the number of speed cameras has risen to more than 5,000. The annual number of automatic £60 fines doubled to three million over the same period.

Speed camera detector
Detectors provide early warning of speed cameras and traps

The Road Safety Bill, which is going through the Commons, includes a provision to outlaw radar and laser-based camera alerts, although equipment using global positioning technology will still be allowed.

Motoring organisations say the Government should compensate owners of the radar or laser detectors, which usually cost between £100 and £200. The satellite-linked systems often cost twice as much.

Users claim that the radar and laser equipment is more effective in detecting mobile speed cameras and identifying whether fixed "Gatso" sites are operational or not. Some manufacturers are threatening legal action if the ban goes ahead. But the Department for Transport says the devices sometimes interfere with camera equipment and are used by "extreme speeders" to evade traps set up by police at locations known for racing. Satellite systems are not used in such ways and are therefore acceptable, an official said.

The RAC said it was a mistake to assume that buyers of detectors were "irresponsible speed addicts".

Edmund King, the executive director, said: "These alerts have clear road safety benefits. They provide drivers with a legitimate reminder that they should slow down, and prevent the need to keep taking their eyes off the road to check the speedometer.

"An awful lot of high-mileage drivers have bought these things in the past few months, or been given them as Christmas presents, because they do not want to risk losing their licence, and possibly their livelihood, over minor speeding infringements. If a ban is implemented, it will raise the question of compensation."

In a poll commissioned by the Drivers Technology Association, 60 per cent of those who used camera detectors said they thought they had become safer drivers as a result.

Three quarters said they had become more aware of speed limits.

Cyclops, one of the larger makers of global positioning alerts, said a ban would cause tens of thousands of drivers to switch systems.

"We predict that sales of GPS driver aides will soar during the second half of the year," said a spokesman.

"The certainty that this type of equipment is legal will also unlock considerable new demand, as people accept that speed cameras are here to stay."

One of the most popular radar detectors, the Quintezz XT7000-Plus detector, at £199, plugs into the cigar lighter socket and provides visual and audible alerts for fixed and mobile cameras and laser speed traps.

The Cyclops GPS detector emits audible and visual warnings as the vehicle comes within 800 metres of a camera site recorded on the central Cyclops database, which is updated daily. It costs £369.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 15:59
Posts: 140
A touch off topic (but bare with me), I remember reading in the paper that the Govt (or local authoritys) were still planning on setting up a website where by joining you can then be e-mailed every morning telling you where all speed camera lcations are going to be on that day.

However I havn't heard anything about this proposed system since. Does anyone know if this system is planned to come into operation.

If it is then why is it that e-mailing people every morning where mobile speed cameras are operating is a good thing yet speed camera detection devices are deemed a bad thing?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 13:07 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Maybe because if they 'forget' to include a mobile location, there is nothing you can do about it if you get caught, hence they may actually catch more people this way as people will assume they don't need to look out for cameras?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 18:09 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
In order to fine you, they have to catch you using one. As the Speed camera has replaced Traffic Police, the detection rate will be worth the risk of use :!:

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 20:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:30
Posts: 56
Seeing as the detection devices are illegal to use in France, perhaps the Government is looking for a bit of EU harmonisation!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 23:13 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 20:56
Posts: 59
Location: Alnwick, Northumberland
Why not play the camera partnerships at their own game here and have a play on words?

Does everyone remember when "speed cameras" were renamed "safety cameras"?

According to the propaganda issued by the scamera partnerships, cameras are only located at accident blackspots with the sole purpose of cutting accident rates. OK then, we don't call them "camera detectors" anymore, we just rename them "accident blackspot detecters"!

I know I won't be giving up my Origin B2 device under any circumstances.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 00:24 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Littlegoozle wrote:
OK then, we don't call them "camera detectors" anymore, we just rename them "accident blackspot detecters"!


Casualty Reduction Devices! :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 02:26 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
Flying Dodo wrote:
Seeing as the detection devices are illegal to use in France, perhaps the Government is looking for a bit of EU harmonisation!


I cannot see much point of using a detector in France, they do not have any static cameras, not that i have seen anyway.

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 03:18 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
bmwk12 wrote:
Flying Dodo wrote:
Seeing as the detection devices are illegal to use in France, perhaps the Government is looking for a bit of EU harmonisation!


I cannot see much point of using a detector in France, they do not have any static cameras, not that i have seen anyway.


They do now. They installed at least 1,000 in 2004.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 03:57 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
Quote:
They do now. They installed at least 1,000 in 2004.


They must of really spaced em out :!:

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 18:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:30
Posts: 56
Someone I know was stopped between Calais & Paris before Christmas. They weren't speeding, but when the policeman saw their radar detector, he asked them if it was plugged in, and when they said yes (even though it hadn't been switched on), it was confiscated, and he had to pay 750 Euros as well!

So I'm sure a UK fine would be more.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 20:03 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Flying Dodo wrote:
perhaps the Government is looking for a bit of EU harmonisation!


Not possible. There are fundimental differences between UK and French law. You cannot simply "harmonise" without fundimental changes in UK law....that ain't gonna happen.. :wink:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 20:08 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
DieselMoment wrote:
Presumably the activities of the companies operating the databases will be outlawed, thus rendering GPS based kit useless.


Nope. There are companies like "trafficmaster" who are supplying systems to the major car manufacturers. These are factory fit options. I don't think the government could justify banning equipment which gives black spot warnings and warn the driver of the speed limit a the same time.

The scamera partnerships have to advertise their camera locations. GPS systems just provide this same information into the car on demand.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 05:34 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 00:14
Posts: 535
Location: Victoria, Australia
The only thing such a law will do is to drive detectors underground as has happened in Australia. The best detectors in Australia are completely hidden and ONLY emit an audible warning. There is no on/off switch visible and they are constantly being updated to make them almost impossible for the police to detect.

Banning them only moves them out of sight and will never remove them. The Americans tried prohibition and that didn't work either.

_________________
Ross

Yes I'm a hoon, but only on the track!!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 13:38 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 23:29
Posts: 10
Location: leicester
*posted the wrong thread initially so here are my cun n pasted thoughts*

This to me just proves the main point about speed cameras being a way to raise revenue

I heard on the radio today that it will be law within the next year.

The governments argument for cameras has always gone like this "speed cameras are there to improve road safety and not to raise money, all cameras are in known accident blackspots...blah blah blah"

Ok given that these are thier claims then surely the idea of cameras would be to slow folk down and hence a speed camera that is doing its job properly should never issue a speeding ticket as folk would be slowing down for it.

Camera detection systems then, it can be argued, are simply an extra precaution. by having one in your car you get an in flight warning system telling you that you are entering a dangerous strech of road and therefore should be extra cautious.

Its just a bit unfortunate for the motorist that these warning systems also have the added side effect of helping them to avoid costly fines!!!

So putting all of that together what we have is a govenment that say in one hand, that they are trying to improve road safety by placing cameras everywhere they deem to be dangersous, yet in the other hand they are telling folk that its illegal for them to take extra precautions to warn them selves of these dangerous streches of road????

I think not! It strikes me that somebody realised that they will make far more money from the scameras if they make it illegal for people to have systems that warn you of thier presence!!!!

And still they would have us belive that they are a road safety measure rather than a revenue raising con trick... :evil:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 23:01 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 14:14
Posts: 190
Location: Far Enough Behind, Far Enough In Front
SafeSpeed wrote:
They do now. They installed at least 1,000 in 2004.

I Can understand the Frogs having Cameras, Flipping maniacs. That was just around the City Centre. God knows what they are like on the open road :roll:

_________________
RoADA Member -GOLD 2008
If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.013s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]