Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Dec 03, 2025 08:46

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 167 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 20:37 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 19:58
Posts: 730
Lum wrote:
Well, my job varies from developer to telephone support to on-site work. I work from home when there is no on-site work going on, but for the on-site work the best I can manage is to travel at off peak hours, which usually means travelling down the night before. I'm not reducing the distance (if anything it increases slightly due to the need to go to a hotel) but the time and fuel consumption are drastically reduced due to removing myself from the busy periods of the day which has to be good for everyone, apart from the works accountant who pays the hotel bills :)

I tried doing my job using public transport once, now I'm sure that when you know your local route PT is a lot more pleasant than my experience but due to the nature of my work I will regularly be taking trips to areas that I am unfamiliar with, and no-one has invented a working PT satnav yet.

So the job comes in, and I phone Arriva Trains Wales and inform that I'd like to travel from my local station to Edinburgh Haymarket, getting there some time between 8PM and 10PM. I am advised that I need to travel from a certain station that's a 15 minute drive from where I live with no bus service to it, and get there for around 2:15, from there I need to travel to Cardiff which will take an hour, from Cardiff to Birmingham New Street and from there to Edinburgh, cool. I book a hotel that's close to the train station. Oh and I can collect my tickets from the station in question. I am billed £137 of my own money for the return journey.

I am a little unhappy at leaving my car in an unsecured car park for 2 nights, but fortunately my GF was working locally at the time, she agrees to pick me up in her lunch break and take me to the station.

I get there and the ticket office is closed. WTF I need my tickets. I ring Arriva Trains Wales, am on hold for 30 minutes during which my train comes and goes so we decide that driving to Cardiff would be a good idea. Eventually they explain that the ticket office at that station shuts at 12PM and I should have arrived early. I ask if it would be ok to drive to Cardiff and get my tickets there, but I cannot, I can only pick them up at the original station and I'm too late anyway because the last train to Birmingham just left.

Pissed off we grab some quick lunch and I am taken to home. I have to explain this cock up to my boss who insists that I fly up, so I book a flight, pay £50 for a taxi to Cardiff airport and £70 for the flight, my customer is kind enough to pick me up from the airport and at the end of the day I'm put on a bus to my hotel.

At some point during the day a problem had arisen with my health which NHS Direct decided needed hospital attention, so that's another 17 quid in taxi fares because I didn't have a car available and had no idea if you could get a bus to the hospital in Edinburgh at that time of night. I also had to get hold of the train company and sort out my ride home. There was no way to get the tickets for the return leg of the journey I had to buy brand new ones which cost me £110.

The return journey was relatively uneventful, apart from the fact that despite getting the first train of the morning the carriage already contained a guy in rugby gear passed out on the floor surrounded by beer cans and mumbling incoherently in a Merseyside accent. He was completely harmless and had apparently meant to change trains at Crewe last night :o.

Eventually I get home and am picked up by my GF in her lunch break again. I send an SMS to by boss telling him that I'm having the rest of the afternoon off and go to bed.

Total cost of trip: £384 plus hotels and food and whatnot.

Next time I'm taking the car or flying.


You'll not be surprised to know that Arriva Trains Wales gave you duff information. :roll:

They should have told you to take the Cardiff, Shrewsbury Crewe line. Change at Crewe for the Edinburgh train.

And the onboard ticket person should have sold you the ticket. And should the train company cock-up, you would be able to buy a ticket at your destination at no penalty to you.

I know how useless Arriva is. Arriva Trains Wales operates trains on my line and they operate what is laughingly described as a bus service here, too. :x

_________________
www.thatsnews.org.uk / www.thatsnews.blogspot.com / http://thatsmotoring.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 22:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 17:58
Posts: 62
PeterE wrote:
Smithy wrote:
What I'm getting at is that I would be suprised if there is nothing you can change in your life that will reduce car use whilst making no difference to the quality of your life.

Which begs the question that reducing car use is per se a desirable objective.

And if I analyse my own pattern of car use, a large majority of it comprises commuting and a weekly trip to visit my parents, neither of which could realistically be accomplished by any other means.

Also I make no apology for both enjoying driving and being interested in roads, so I make some journeys that are not by a narrow definition "necessary" but in my view represent the pursuit of a legitimate leisure activity - and are virtually never undertaken at congested times.


I would say reducing congestion and reducing waste(of fuel) and the indirect benefit of becoming fitter were desirable just as much for the individual as to society as a whole.

Smithy wrote:
Cutting out the occasional trip to the newsagents and the chippy is not really going to make any difference to overall congestion levels.


It's not just that though, there are many journies that can be combined to cut the overall milage. The supermarket run was one, and getting to work could be another if you consider the walk or bike to either the destination or a train station as an alternative to going to the gym.

_________________
In a former life I was Capri2.8


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 22:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 17:58
Posts: 62
Lum wrote:
Well, my job varies from developer to telephone support to on-site work. I work from home when there is no on-site work going on, but for the on-site work the best I can manage is to travel at off peak hours, which usually means travelling down the night before. I'm not reducing the distance (if anything it increases slightly due to the need to go to a hotel) but the time and fuel consumption are drastically reduced due to removing myself from the busy periods of the day which has to be good for everyone, apart from the works accountant who pays the hotel bills :)

I tried doing my job using public transport once, now I'm sure that when you know your local route PT is a lot more pleasant than my experience but due to the nature of my work I will regularly be taking trips to areas that I am unfamiliar with, and no-one has invented a working PT satnav yet.

So the job comes in, and I phone Arriva Trains Wales and inform that I'd like to travel from my local station to Edinburgh Haymarket, getting there some time between 8PM and 10PM. I am advised that I need to travel from a certain station that's a 15 minute drive from where I live with no bus service to it, and get there for around 2:15, from there I need to travel to Cardiff which will take an hour, from Cardiff to Birmingham New Street and from there to Edinburgh, cool. I book a hotel that's close to the train station. Oh and I can collect my tickets from the station in question. I am billed £137 of my own money for the return journey.

I am a little unhappy at leaving my car in an unsecured car park for 2 nights, but fortunately my GF was working locally at the time, she agrees to pick me up in her lunch break and take me to the station.

I get there and the ticket office is closed. WTF I need my tickets. I ring Arriva Trains Wales, am on hold for 30 minutes during which my train comes and goes so we decide that driving to Cardiff would be a good idea. Eventually they explain that the ticket office at that station shuts at 12PM and I should have arrived early. I ask if it would be ok to drive to Cardiff and get my tickets there, but I cannot, I can only pick them up at the original station and I'm too late anyway because the last train to Birmingham just left.

Pissed off we grab some quick lunch and I am taken to home. I have to explain this cock up to my boss who insists that I fly up, so I book a flight, pay £50 for a taxi to Cardiff airport and £70 for the flight, my customer is kind enough to pick me up from the airport and at the end of the day I'm put on a bus to my hotel.

At some point during the day a problem had arisen with my health which NHS Direct decided needed hospital attention, so that's another 17 quid in taxi fares because I didn't have a car available and had no idea if you could get a bus to the hospital in Edinburgh at that time of night. I also had to get hold of the train company and sort out my ride home. There was no way to get the tickets for the return leg of the journey I had to buy brand new ones which cost me £110.

The return journey was relatively uneventful, apart from the fact that despite getting the first train of the morning the carriage already contained a guy in rugby gear passed out on the floor surrounded by beer cans and mumbling incoherently in a Merseyside accent. He was completely harmless and had apparently meant to change trains at Crewe last night :o.

Eventually I get home and am picked up by my GF in her lunch break again. I send an SMS to by boss telling him that I'm having the rest of the afternoon off and go to bed.

Total cost of trip: £384 plus hotels and food and whatnot.

Next time I'm taking the car or flying.


I recently went to Birmingham to see a friend(I go quite often)

Booked tickets on the interweb, turned up next day in the post. Walked 20 minutes to my local station so I didn't have to leave a car anywere. Turned up for an on-time train to Preston, and onward connection to Birmingham. Read paper in comfort and strolled to onboard "shop" for a hot chocolate. Alighted in Birmigham New Street, met up with my friend and enjoyed a cold beer.

Cost of ticket? £20.
Cost of parking: Nothing
Cost of relaxing with a paper instead of the hassle of the M6: Priceless

I'm sorry you had a bad expierence, but it's not always as bad as that, sometimes it's quite pleasant not to drive.

_________________
In a former life I was Capri2.8


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 23:07 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Smithy wrote:
I recently went to Birmingham to see a friend(I go quite often)

Booked tickets on the interweb, turned up next day in the post. Walked 20 minutes to my local station so I didn't have to leave a car anywere. Turned up for an on-time train to Preston, and onward connection to Birmingham. Read paper in comfort and strolled to onboard "shop" for a hot chocolate. Alighted in Birmigham New Street, met up with my friend and enjoyed a cold beer.

Cost of ticket? £20.
Cost of parking: Nothing
Cost of relaxing with a paper instead of the hassle of the M6: Priceless

I'm sorry you had a bad expierence, but it's not always as bad as that, sometimes it's quite pleasant not to drive.


There's a few key differences there though.

1) You had this planned in advance, you wern't responding to a callout, wheras I'll tend to get callouts at 16:59 from customers that have next day support in their contract.

2) You were going to Birmingham which is really easy to get to by train from anywhere in the country. London is the other place where I'd still consider trains though usually I tend to just drive into Zone 4, find somewhere free to park (yes I know a few places, I'm not sharing them lest Ken find out and shut them down) and then get a travel card. I find the underground works fairly well so long as I don't mind suffering from a cold for the next few days, but people still moan about that regularly.

My previous public transport experiences haven't been much better, for example an attempt to get from Aylesbury to Liverpool involved receiving advice that I had to travel to Princes Risborough, wait for 61 minutes then train to Brum, walk to New Street, train to Crewe, train to Liverpool. That one was a fiasco from the start since upon arriving at Princes Risborough I found myself in a desolate rural station with very little except a "french style" cafe called "Bonjour" and run by an over enthusiastic guy with a really bad accent and knowledge of only two words of French. While I was purchasing a crossiant and a cup of dishwater that claimed to be coffee, the train to Birmingham pulls up, and departs while I'm legging it over the bridge with bag and laptop in tow. Yes they were hourly trains but the routing system had assumed it took more than one minute to cross the bridge so didn't tell anyone about it.

I spent most of the Brum trip listening to two chavvy-looking girls having a winge because MySpace said that the username "stacy" was already taken and trying to come up with an alternative before somehow getting onto the topic of Tunisia being filled with nothing but camel poo. I then nearly missed my stop because in train-PA-system speak "Sna-Linton" means "Birmingham Snow Hill", a quick trek through the centre of Brum in the pissing rain and then an uneventful Virgin Trains trip to Crewe. By uneventful I mean "I couldn't even get up for a piss because I was being wedged against the wall by a fat bastard whose stomach was encroaching over the armrests into my seat and he refused to get up to let me get to the toilet. Also he stank.

I do however take your point about the M6. I just wish it had a couple of extra lanes.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 23:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Smithy wrote:
PeterE wrote:
Smithy wrote:
What I'm getting at is that I would be suprised if there is nothing you can change in your life that will reduce car use whilst making no difference to the quality of your life.

Which begs the question that reducing car use is per se a desirable objective.
And if I analyse my own pattern of car use, a large majority of it comprises commuting and a weekly trip to visit my parents, neither of which could realistically be accomplished by any other means.

Also I make no apology for both enjoying driving and being interested in roads, so I make some journeys that are not by a narrow definition "necessary" but in my view represent the pursuit of a legitimate leisure activity - and are virtually never undertaken at congested times.


I would say reducing congestion and reducing waste(of fuel) and the indirect benefit of becoming fitter were desirable just as much for the individual as to society as a whole.

Smithy wrote:
Cutting out the occasional trip to the newsagents and the chippy is not really going to make any difference to overall congestion levels.

It's not just that though, there are many journies that can be combined to cut the overall milage. The supermarket run was one, and getting to work could be another if you consider the walk or bike to either the destination or a train station as an alternative to going to the gym.

I think you've rather missed the point of my post there.

And surely one of the benefits of a prosperous society is that people are able to travel more and also have access to a wider range of goods.

It doesn't take a genius to cut congestion by creating economic recession - you don't tend to find many queues in depressed areas, but you do in thriving ones.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 23:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 17:58
Posts: 62
Lum wrote:
There's a few key differences there though.

1) You had this planned in advance, you wern't responding to a callout, wheras I'll tend to get callouts at 16:59 from customers that have next day support in their contract.

2) You were going to Birmingham which is really easy to get to by train from anywhere in the country. London is the other place where I'd still consider trains though usually I tend to just drive into Zone 4, find somewhere free to park (yes I know a few places, I'm not sharing them lest Ken find out and shut them down) and then get a travel card. I find the underground works fairly well so long as I don't mind suffering from a cold for the next few days, but people still moan about that regularly.


The only difference is it would have cost more, there were plenty of seats available. However I take the point that last minute journies at peak times(with no seat reservation) will not be quite as relaxing!

Just a tip though, I would never use call centres for jouney information if you can possibly avoid it, just use http://www.nationalrail.co.uk unless you were on the go and not near a computer.

Your job probably isn't suitable for using PT, fair enough, not a problem. Neither is mine, simply due to the time I start in the morning. I supect though that because you prefer to travel by car, any disruption with PT is likely to flag up more prominantly than similar disruption on the roads. There is nothing wrong with that, I think it's just the way the mind works.

_________________
In a former life I was Capri2.8


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 23:37 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 17:58
Posts: 62
PeterE wrote:
I think you've rather missed the point of my post there.

And surely one of the benefits of a prosperous society is that people are able to travel more and also have access to a wider range of goods.

It doesn't take a genius to cut congestion by creating economic recession - you don't tend to find many queues in depressed areas, but you do in thriving ones.


My apologies, I wasn't exactly sure what you were getting at.

As you have probably gathered, with some specific exceptions I don't generally support large scale road building. But we could use the road space we have more efficently with just a little effort and no reduction in quality of life.

_________________
In a former life I was Capri2.8


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 23:42 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Smithy wrote:
The only difference is it would have cost more, there were plenty of seats available. However I take the point that last minute journies at peak times(with no seat reservation) will not be quite as relaxing!

Just a tip though, I would never use call centres for jouney information if you can possibly avoid it, just use http://www.nationalrail.co.uk unless you were on the go and not near a computer.


I've used that site from time to time, though admittedly not for a while. Does it work in Firefox yet as I don't have IE on my home PC.

Quote:
Your job probably isn't suitable for using PT, fair enough, not a problem. Neither is mine, simply due to the time I start in the morning. I supect though that because you prefer to travel by car, any disruption with PT is likely to flag up more prominantly than similar disruption on the roads. There is nothing wrong with that, I think it's just the way the mind works.


Oh, I notice the problems with car trips too, I'm fond of pointing out that "there's always a crash on the M6", I just find it easier to route around them, hell with modern satnavs with TMC or whatever it's called this can even be fully automatic thought I generally prefer to figure out my own alternate route.

When something bad happens on the railways, the solutions is almost always rail replacement busses. Fortunately I haven't had one of these since I was a teenager coming home from London...everyone was kicked off the train at Crewe, it was supposed to be the express train with only stops at Runcorn and Liverpool to go, we were bundled onto a bus and had to wait for the next train to arrive, the stop at every stop train, and then go on a magical mystery tour of Cheshire before everyone got off at Runcorn leaving me on my own with a driver who had no idea how to get to Liverpool from Runcorn. Being the teenage little shit that I was I directed him down the M56, onto the M53, got him to drop me off at Junction 4 which was 5 minutes from my mums (the nearest station was 15 minutes away) and then told him to keep going to the end of the motorway, through the tunnel and then follow signs for Lime Street.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 17:58
Posts: 62
Lum wrote:
When something bad happens on the railways, the solutions is almost always rail replacement busses. Fortunately I haven't had one of these since I was a teenager coming home from London...everyone was kicked off the train at Crewe, it was supposed to be the express train with only stops at Runcorn and Liverpool to go, we were bundled onto a bus and had to wait for the next train to arrive, the stop at every stop train, and then go on a magical mystery tour of Cheshire before everyone got off at Runcorn leaving me on my own with a driver who had no idea how to get to Liverpool from Runcorn. Being the teenage little shit that I was I directed him down the M56, onto the M53, got him to drop me off at Junction 4 which was 5 minutes from my mums (the nearest station was 15 minutes away) and then told him to keep going to the end of the motorway, through the tunnel and then follow signs for Lime Street.


Ahh the old rail replacement bus.... however this is nearly always pre-planned so you should be aware of the disruption in advance. It's quite rare for them to be used on an emergency basis as unless the line is pysically impassable there are normally ways and means of running trains. So to say the answer is "nearly always" buses is inaccurate.

However the increase in using buses due to engineering work can be attributed in a large part to privatisation because in the past they would have tried where possible to use 1 line(out of a pair) in both directions. However this requires co-operation from the TOCs to thin out the service and it would cost Network Rail more to pay the delays to services this way than to pay compensation to stop all trains.

But there is hope, the chief exec of NR has said they are going to be trialling new engineering methods of pre-fabricating things in the factory so they can be "dropped in" much quicker. It also means points etc can be tested in controlled conditions in a factory rather than out on site where weather conditions can be horrendous. He estimates a weekend possesion wil be able to be done in a night.

_________________
In a former life I was Capri2.8


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Lum wrote:
Smithy wrote:
Just a tip though, I would never use call centres for jouney information if you can possibly avoid it, just use http://www.nationalrail.co.uk unless you were on the go and not near a computer.


I've used that site from time to time, though admittedly not for a while. Does it work in Firefox yet as I don't have IE on my home PC.

I've not had problems with it. Last time I used it was on Firefox on a Mac.

The data isn't always perfect though, the last time the reported delay for the train I was watching was about 25 minutes, but it ended up being about 35 minutes late. And the time before the train was abandoned due to being delayed for so long, but that information never made it on to the system.

But there was at least one time when it was right, and that was very useful.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:31 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Smithy wrote:
Ahh the old rail replacement bus.... however this is nearly always pre-planned so you should be aware of the disruption in advance. It's quite rare for them to be used on an emergency basis as unless the line is pysically impassable there are normally ways and means of running trains. So to say the answer is "nearly always" buses is inaccurate.


This was a long time ago (well, 1998), in fact it was the first time I'd ever gone on a long trip entirely on my own with no parental planning or assistance involved. Hell it was before I'd even passed my driving test! No-one advised me that such a thing was going on when I booked the tickets, though they did advise me that it would be more cost effective to buy a Young Person's Railcard* and call back even if I never used the thing again! The trip down on the Friday had no problems with the line (just an overcrowded train that resulted me sitting in the luggage compartment for 4 hours! it was the trip back on Sunday where there were problems, but my real complaint is the driver didn't know how to get from Runcorn to Liverpool! even I knew that and I didn't drive. Sure I was able to use the situation to my own advantage but that's not really the point.

Quote:
However the increase in using buses due to engineering work can be attributed in a large part to privatisation because in the past they would have tried where possible to use 1 line(out of a pair) in both directions. However this requires co-operation from the TOCs to thin out the service and it would cost Network Rail more to pay the delays to services this way than to pay compensation to stop all trains.


Well we're in agreement about one thing. It's the government's fault that the railways are so bad.

Quote:
But there is hope, the chief exec of NR has said they are going to be trialling new engineering methods of pre-fabricating things in the factory so they can be "dropped in" much quicker. It also means points etc can be tested in controlled conditions in a factory rather than out on site where weather conditions can be horrendous. He estimates a weekend possession wil be able to be done in a night.


Interesting, but I'll believe it when I see it ;)


*I find the existence of these things interesting as well, after you hit 25 you can't get them any more, this is the same age that car insurance becomes less extortionate for most people, so what is the purpose of them? It would appear designed so that once people hit 25 they are pushed off the trains and into cars. I doubt it's actually cheaper to carry young people on the trail (most likely more expensive due to vandalism) so what's the point, why not make the railcard available to everybody, since once you've bought the thing you may be encouraged to use the train more often.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 14:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 17:58
Posts: 62
Ziltro wrote:
I've not had problems with it. Last time I used it was on Firefox on a Mac.

The data isn't always perfect though, the last time the reported delay for the train I was watching was about 25 minutes, but it ended up being about 35 minutes late. And the time before the train was abandoned due to being delayed for so long, but that information never made it on to the system.

But there was at least one time when it was right, and that was very useful.


There are limititation to the real time monitering system, which are clearly displayed on the site. Information is taken from the railway's train monitoring system called TRUST. As trains pass certain points of the network, namely key stations and junctions a time is recorded either manually or automatically. However, a train can be delayed between two reporting points, which won't show up until it has passed the next reporting point.

Overall though it's quite reliable and it's good that this information is available real-time to the public.

_________________
In a former life I was Capri2.8


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 14:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 17:58
Posts: 62
Lum wrote:
This was a long time ago (well, 1998), in fact it was the first time I'd ever gone on a long trip entirely on my own with no parental planning or assistance involved. Hell it was before I'd even passed my driving test! No-one advised me that such a thing was going on when I booked the tickets, though they did advise me that it would be more cost effective to buy a Young Person's Railcard* and call back even if I never used the thing again! The trip down on the Friday had no problems with the line (just an overcrowded train that resulted me sitting in the luggage compartment for 4 hours! it was the trip back on Sunday where there were problems, but my real complaint is the driver didn't know how to get from Runcorn to Liverpool! even I knew that and I didn't drive. Sure I was able to use the situation to my own advantage but that's not really the point.


Yes I agree, I hate rail replacement buses and so do everybody else. But you were trying to suggest that this is regular in times of disruption. It's not. It does occasionally happen at other than pre-planned times but it's rare. Most failures can be worked round to allow a service to run, but with delays. The biggest causes of delay are:-

Cable Theft
Suicide
Bridge Bashes

All of which aren't under the railway's immediate control. There are initititives to combat cable theft targeting the scrap dealers and making the cables more secure. But the more they make the cables secure the more difficult they become to access when there is a fault! There is a review ongoing with bridges to asses which ones are unlikely to suffer damage(and even then trains will initially be cautioned) - it's the shifting of the ballast they are afraid of although it's very rare that there is ever an issue


Quote:
*I find the existence of these things interesting as well, after you hit 25 you can't get them any more, this is the same age that car insurance becomes less extortionate for most people, so what is the purpose of them? It would appear designed so that once people hit 25 they are pushed off the trains and into cars. I doubt it's actually cheaper to carry young people on the trail (most likely more expensive due to vandalism) so what's the point, why not make the railcard available to everybody, since once you've bought the thing you may be encouraged to use the train more often.


The purpose of them is them is to encourage young people to use the train. The theory is if they become familiar with them travelling to uni etc, they are likely to use them more often later in life.

If anyone could get them they may as well just lower the price of the ticket in the first place.

_________________
In a former life I was Capri2.8


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 16:05 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Smithy wrote:
...encourage young people to use the train. The theory is if they become familiar with them travelling to uni etc, they are likely to use them more often later in life.


That's McDonalds theory. (With hamburgers obviously) Seems to work too :roll:

(Can't believe I called them hamburgers)

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 14:44 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
theclaud wrote:
Rigpig wrote:
I believe you'll find that most of us welcome intelligent debate. I do however suggest that in making one of your opening posts an 'attack' on someone's beliefs (whether you are right or wrong) you perhaps announced your arrival in a confrontational manner :?:
And noting your comments about peer review, I reckon that some will believe you to be here on another agenda, but we'll shall we.
However, if we can now wipe the slate clean and start again then I'm up for a reasonable chat about congestion.


Hi Rigpig
I suppose it was a little confrontational, but it was in response to a breathtakingly disingenous and irrelevant slur on immigrants

Yes you're right, it was confrontational. This thread was about Congestion, where the first posting listed various possible causes or contributory factor to congestion. I posted another possible cause to congestion and because it was a non-PC thing to say, you thought it OK to castigate me.

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 16:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 18:51
Posts: 24
Location: Swansea
malcolmw wrote:
Sufficient roads and parking should be provided to allow people to use their chosen mode of transport. I don't want to leave my car at home; I want to drive it when I want, unencumbered by nannying people telling me what they think is best for me.


Ah, well – in that case I think I’ll drive a gritter. Or perhaps an armoured car. I might even park it outside your house.

I understand perfectly well that there are people who do not want to see a reduction in car use. I do not accuse you of hypocrisy – your behaviour appears to be perfectly consistent with your world view. And your world view appears to be that it is OK to do what you want, irrespective of its effect on other people – correct me if I’m misunderstanding you. I think that it is fine to do what you want, unless or until it causes harm to others. Therefore I think that I should have a say in what you do only insofar as it affects me. Unaccountably, you seem to regard this as some kind of extremism.

Where cars come in is that to drive (or park) a private car on a public road is a privilege regulated by laws and licenses. It is not, and never has been, a fundamental human right – so don’t act as if I’m advocating state intervention in who you meet or have sex with, what you read or who (if anyone) you worship. Your car emits harmful fumes which I am obliged to breathe; if it hits me, it will hurt or kill me; It obliges pedestrians to remain ever-vigilant and erects barriers to where they can go; it shapes towns and cities to it needs, ignoring or over-riding the needs of people.

And I won’t even mention global warming or everyone being hideously unfit.

For the moment, we tolerate all this because the adaptation of society to the car has rendered it seemingly indispensable, and because we continue to believe (wrongly, in my opinion) that in confers freedom on individuals. When convenience is compromised by the undemocratic fact that The More People Have A Car The Less Useful It Becomes, and consequently liberty reveals itself as a myth, all we will have left is habit. Some of us are noticing signs of this already.

For the record, I accept that a car is (in concept at least) a useful thing, and that each use of the car offers tangible benefits which are not necessarily to be sneered at. In return perhaps you will acknowledge that it also results in actual and often measurable social harms, and that as a society we are entitled to debate what level of car use is desirable. I also recognise that motorists are just ordinary people going about their business, and are not, as a rule, hell-bent on the destruction of each other and everyone else, so let’s have less hysteria every time anyone articulates a non-motoring position. I also ask you to acknowledge that I have not advocated banning anything, and your characterisation of me as some kind of authoritarian is wildly inaccurate. All I have done is suggest that reducing car use is possible, argue in favour of it, and point out that it will reduce congestion.

PS As for magic words – I don’t believe in magic. Do you find that patronising as well?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 16:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 17:58
Posts: 62
theclaud wrote:
For the record, I accept that a car is (in concept at least) a useful thing, and that each use of the car offers tangible benefits which are not necessarily to be sneered at. In return perhaps you will acknowledge that it also results in actual and often measurable social harms, and that as a society we are entitled to debate what level of car use is desirable. I also recognise that motorists are just ordinary people going about their business, and are not, as a rule, hell-bent on the destruction of each other and everyone else, so let’s have less hysteria every time anyone articulates a non-motoring position. I also ask you to acknowledge that I have not advocated banning anything, and your characterisation of me as some kind of authoritarian is wildly inaccurate. All I have done is suggest that reducing car use is possible, argue in favour of it, and point out that it will reduce congestion.

PS As for magic words – I don’t believe in magic. Do you find that patronising as well?


Very well argued, and done far more eloquently that I could ever manage!

_________________
In a former life I was Capri2.8


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 17:39 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 18:51
Posts: 24
Location: Swansea
Graeme wrote:
So basically, you don't like cars so I can't have one? I don't suppose I'm allowed to fly off on holidays either, or put the heating on?


I can't help thinking that if you had a sounder argument you would not need either to misrepresent me or to be so reductive in your arguments. I have not said anything about my personal feelings towards cars. I have only ever owned one, and I liked it enormously. I once drove a borrowed 2.8L Capri all round Scotland, and found it tremendously enjoyable. I think I was a relatively irresponsible driver when I was younger. Later on I became a better (as in safer) driver, and enjoyed it much less. Now I rarely drive at all, except the company van on occasion. I think a small number of cars are beautiful, but most are extremely ugly. I also think that, for reasons I explained in a recent post, they are (on balance) A Bad Thing for society as a whole. I can't stop you having one, and I haven't tried with anything except words. We can talk about flying if you want, but this board's already got quite a lot of stuff going on. I expect when you put the heating on, you don't leave all the doors and windows open or turn it up full blast and go away for two weeks - so you are already susceptible to economic incentives to think about the consequences of your behaviour, if not environmental ones. Or perhaps you think we should lower domestic fuel prices so you can afford to do what you like with your heating?

Graeme wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to stop those countries that can't support their own populations from breeding rather than have them here?


So - you complain about the "nanny state" but support the enforced sterilization of entire populations. I can't think of anything to say to such a morally repugnant suggestion, except that it is quite clear which of us is the extremist.

Graeme wrote:
As for other road users - how many roads do you think there would be without motorists? Who's going to pay the 60B in taxes taken from motorists?


I think you'll find that roads pre-date cars. Anyway, if there are fewer cars, then I think we can make do with fewer roads. I would prefer not to start an argument about general taxation and the true cost of motoring here (just cos there's too much going on and we haven't established enough common ground ), but I do not really agree with this simple sum.

Graeme wrote:
As for public transport - well when it's as pleasant and convenient as getting in my own car, then I'll think about it. Incidently did you know that passenger for passenger, buses give off 4 times as much CO2 than cars?


That's big of you. It may be in an even worse state by then, and as someone who neither supports nor uses it, you'll be in a poor position to complain. Interesting fact(oid) if it's true - what's the source of it? And do you mean modern buses or Routemasters?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 18:57 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
theclaud wrote:
Graeme wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to stop those countries that can't support their own populations from breeding rather than have them here?


So - you complain about the "nanny state" but support the enforced sterilization of entire populations. I can't think of anything to say to such a morally repugnant suggestion, except that it is quite clear which of us is the extremist.


Well, this may sound bad coming from me but here goes anyway...

I'm not singling out any country or race, I don't care who my neighbour is, but there is a direct relationship between the quality of life, (all life on this planet), and the sheer number of humans. I've said it before but we can't all aspire to having a nice home with: TV, fridge, and all the modern trappings and, last but not least, 'some' means of transport. (Let's not just pick on the car).

Since it is not possible to regulate how much we breed, the outcome is inevitable - we're all doomed. I have every right to spawn as many children as I like, all of whom are at liberty to do the same as me, all demanding ever more resources until something gives. Human history is littered with reaction instead of pro-action. It always has to break before we fix it. Clearly this cannot go on but who ever dares to tell it as it is? No-one, least of all a politician! Where will we be when there are 20 billion of us?

I would prefer a balance where we can embrace modern technology, complete with cars, but there's no way 60 billion or more can do it, no matter how much of us give up our cars or TVs or X-Box...

We are beginning to see the effects in China. They want what the Americans have enjoyed/used/wasted, (which is understandable), but imagine what will happen if or when they do! :yikes:

If there were just three million people in this country, like New Zealand or the state of Idaho, instead of the 60+ million or if the world population was less than a billion, (let's say), then maybe we would all have room and could all enjoy life complete with cars and without upsetting the delicate balance of nature. We shouldn't need to go back to troglodytes but it almost seems like that is where some would lead us these days.

It is the sheer number of humans IMHO which is the problem but of course it would be political suicide to mention it. It's bad enough to even say it as I have done here without sounding like a misanthropist but I actually do care about our life - all life! Ultimately there can be no life or quality of life if we don't reduce our numbers. So although you disliked what Graeme said, (perhaps "those countries" wasn't the best thing to say), what answer do you have?

Industry pumps out far more crud than cars but what is feeding industry? People, naturally.

I know one westernised person probably does more harm than a thousand in a third world country, so you could argue if anyone needs sterilising is should be 'us' lot.

Well, now I look like a fan of Hitler and a nut so I'd better go have a pint...

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 19:40 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Big Tone wrote:
Well, now I look like a fan of Hitler and a nut so I'd better go have a pint...


No you don't, you are just laying out the plain facts. We can't all be prosperous, we can't all have everything we want (because there would be nothing to want after all) but we can aspire to it.
The evolution of the car is a sign of progress, I don't necessarily see mass ownership of cars as progress itself though, merely a sign of a changing economic climate and the way transport policy has taken us. I'm pretty darned certain that if, say, 50 years ago a monorail network had been built linking all of the significant places in our local area with free, fast moving trains with space for our purchases, running at 10 minute intervals, we'd all think that crawling in and out of Homebase's carpark along with hundreds of other like minded souls was a sign of regression not progression.
The car is what it is because of the way historically we have let our society develop. If anything significant had changed over the past half century, mass car ownership may not be seen as progress at all.

_________________
Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 167 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.147s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]