Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Jun 27, 2026 08:18

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:45 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
link

Quote:
Motorist faked death to avoid speeding fines
A DRIVER who tried to fake his own death to avoid three speeding charges was caught when police recognised him from a speed camera image.

Father-to-be Shafkat Munir, of Mulberry Walk, Blackburn, was worried that if he was caught speeding, and possibly banned from the roads, he could lose his job as a waiter at a restaurant, a court heard.

Munir had been issued with three summonses in January and February 2007 - two in Lancashire and one in South Yorkshire - and initially accepted he was the driver of the Honda Civic in question.

But he later sent a death certificate, written in Urdu, to both police forces, claiming that a 'Shafkat Munir' had actually died four years previously, Preston Crown Court was told.

The 26-year-old was jailed for 12 months after admitting three offences of attempting to pervert the course of justice at an earlier court hearing .

Prosecutor Emma Keogh said police became suspicious, especially officers in South Yorkshire, and launched further inquiries.

Munir's photo was on the police national computer after he was jailed in 2005 for two months for stealing from his former employers, the De Tabley Bar and Grill in Ribchester, where he worked as a head waiter.

The photo matched a speed camera image, captured of the driver in the South Yorkshire speeding offence.


Shafkat Munir
Further checks were made with the Driver Vehicle Licensing Agency in Swansea, which held Munir's driving records, with their picture also bearing a striking resemblance to the suspected speeder.

Munir was arrested and immediately made admissions to police about what he had done.

Michael Gleeson, defending, said his client had made a "pathetic attempt" to evade justice which was always going to be discovered.

While Munir did have previous convictions, he had now settled down and held down a steady job at a restaurant in Manchester, he added.

It was because he feared losing his driving licence, which he needed for work, that he had sent the death certificate to police, said Mr Gleeson.

The court heard that Munir had also wanted to keep his licence as his wife was receiving IVF treatment at a Leeds hospital at the time.

This had proved successful and she was now expecting their first child late this year.

Munir also looked after his mother and any prison sentence would hit his family hard, added Mr Gleeson.

Jailing Munir, Judge Andrew Gilbart QC said: "Interfering with the course of justice demands a custodial sentence, especially if there is a calculated plan to disrupt a prosecution by the production of a fraudulent death certificate."

Munir was also banned from driving for 18 months - the original speeding offences could not be prosecuted because they had now fallen outside the six months statute of limitations for such charges.

Speaking after the sentencing, John Davies, project manager for Lancashire Partnership for Road Safety, said: "Pretending to be dead to avoid paying speeding fines amounting to £180 is almost unbelievable.

"Munir's licence was clean before this spate of incidents and he would have still been able to drive - I have never known anyone go to such lengths.

"All credit to investigating officers across the forces for their determination to bring this man to face justice."

He added: "Excess speed is at least partly to blame for one in three deaths on Lancashire's roads and speed limits are in place to protect us.

"Those caught speeding will be prosecuted and may well trigger investigations into previous offences if the slightest suspicion is raised."

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 13:10 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
John Davies, project manager for Lancashire Partnership for Road Safety wrote:
Pretending to be dead to avoid paying speeding fines amounting to £180 is almost unbelievable.


Dear oh dear John, someone in your position ought to know by now that it's not the fines people are wanting to avoid, it's the points (and subsequent risk of a ban/loss of job/hike in insurance) that most people would like to steer well clear of. Look at how many people opt to, when given the chance, pay the extra to attend those first-time offender education courses, even if the total cost of attendance (e.g. having to take unpaid leave or travelling significant distances to the course centre) greatly exceeds the up-front 60 quid cost of simply accepting the fine/points...

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 13:57 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:27
Posts: 301
One factor that should be mentioned is the way that points penalise all, irrespective of their wealth. A monetary fine has significantly greater impact on the poor, which is regressive.

Points, however, impact all those who like driving, whether they have plenty of readies or not. In this sense, they are a way of punishing “bad” driving irrespective of class divisions (notwithstanding the various interpretations of what is “bad”!)

So points are not completely bad – few would favour a system where no disincentive exists if you are wealthy enough not to care.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 14:11 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
I agree, but only up to a point (no pun intended)! It's still the guy with the most dosh who wins. He can afford the "Mr. Loopholes" of this world to defend him in court and if he looses, he can always get a chauffeur!

If fact, I believe certain high-ranking policemen also get chauffeurs... :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 14:50 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:27
Posts: 301
Mole wrote:
I agree, but only up to a point (no pun intended)! It's still the guy with the most dosh who wins.


Yes. Physical punishment is more "even" so to speak. The cat 'o nine tails is just as fearsome, no matter how rich or poor you may be! I can't see (for example) Caprice smirking with that legal outcome, can you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_of_nine_tails


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 15:30 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Valle Crucis wrote:
Mole wrote:
I agree, but only up to a point (no pun intended)! It's still the guy with the most dosh who wins.


Yes. Physical punishment is more "even" so to speak. The cat 'o nine tails is just as fearsome, no matter how rich or poor you may be! I can't see (for example) Caprice smirking with that legal outcome, can you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_of_nine_tails


Actually I had some thoughts on the subject of flogging as a punishment some years ago. It actually has a lot of benefits. In particular it is "just" in that it causes only minimal costs/penelties to innocent third parties (all the way from immediate dependents to the general taxpayer) It is a powerful deterrent and yet, should there be a misscarriage of justice the long term consequences for the punished are not that severe and can be compensated for in a manner that is impossible for somebody who has been imprisoned, possibly for years.

Socialy it is also possible that the general public might be more inclined to "forgive" and accept a felon who has been publically (and yes, it should be public!) punnished in this manner. A vital part of any "rehabilitation" process.

The more I think about it the better the idea seems. The government would oppose it of course claiming that it would be "Inhumane" or some sort of twaddle but really it would be because there is a whole industry employing tens of thousants of civil servants based around locking people up and fines represent a significant source of "Non-tax" revenue.

:twisted:

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 15:44 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:27
Posts: 301
Dusty wrote:
The more I think about it the better the idea seems. The government would oppose it of course claiming that it would be "Inhumane" or some sort of twaddle but really it would be because there is a whole industry employing tens of thousands of civil servants based around locking people up and fines represent a significant source of "Non-tax" revenue.


In any case, prison sentences should be much shorter, but very much hasher. I don’t see why convicts should watch tele. They should pick up litter in chain gangs, and things like that. And as for spending billions of gaols, forget it. Lock them in sheds out in the fens.

Another interesting punishment would be to make them wear pink tutus, like ballerinas. It would provide much needed entertainment, and they might be disinclined to go through it next time.

You know, there is still a set of “stocks” in the Welsh town of Denbigh, but they aren’t used anymore. It would have been a great (and cheap!) day out to visit them and throw (how should I put this) disgusting things at the chumps locked in them!

The past was far better than the present!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 16:35 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Valle Crucis wrote:
Another interesting punishment would be to make them wear pink tutus, like ballerinas. It would provide much needed entertainment, and they might be disinclined to go through it next time.


Like this you mean? :)

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16549

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 19:36 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:27
Posts: 301
Big Tone wrote:
Like this you mean? :)


Typical American ... he's stolen my idea!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 13:35 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Valle Crucis wrote:
Big Tone wrote:
Like this you mean? :)


Typical American ... he's stolen my idea!


:lol:

Careful, we got American supporters here and very nice they are too.

Cover your eyes Rush; he didn't mean it :)

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:07 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
Damn those trolls!!

:shock:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 15:43 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Can a moderator remove it ASAP please?

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 21:28 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
Only just home - sorry for delay.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.039s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]