Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Apr 25, 2026 14:14

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Budget ?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 17:39 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
So, road pricing is off ?
Or:

Quote:
Mr Darling said road pricing remained a possible solution to congestion in the "longer term" and announced that the Government would fund trials of road pricing technology, with the results due next year.




Times Online

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 18:15 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
Yeah I saw that. Despite constantly banging on about financial struggles and the need to raise revenue, they are quite ok to waste it on fucking morons researching the already rejected idea of road pricing. bastards


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 18:56 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
And you haven't even mentioned the swingeing increases in VED.

A car with a CO2 output of 181-185 g/km (i.e. a very bog-standard family car) will see VED rise from £170 in 2008-09 to £260 in 2009-10 and £270 in 2010-2011 :x

You can download the full budget report here:

http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/news/nol/sha ... report.pdf

The VED table is on page 131 of 222.

And the 4p a pint rise in beer duty will only serve to accelerate the rate of pub closures and promote uncontrolled drinking at home or in the street, and cross-border shopping and smuggling :x :x

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 19:10 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
So, those people with older larger cars (a.k.a. hard working families) registered after March 2001 will get really clobbered.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 19:16 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
malcolmw wrote:
So, those people with older larger cars (a.k.a. hard working families) registered after March 2001 will get really clobbered.

Yes, from the table it looks like the cap on cars registered between March 2001 and March 2006 will be removed. So annual VED could go up from £170 to £440 in a year. Wonderful :(

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 19:23 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
I particularly like paying so much VED when I only use my car for ~4000 miles a year.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 19:52 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Yet again we have lt ourselves be conned by the use of the word "poluting"

When cars produce C02 it is called polution....When animals produce it it is called respiration.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 20:40 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
malcolmw wrote:
So, those people with older larger cars (a.k.a. hard working families) registered after March 2001 will get really clobbered.


And, loads of people will run around in clapped out underpowered 1300 compact cars belching out filth while pristine large cars with loads of life left in them rot away in scrap yards.

How eco-friendly.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 21:10 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
Quote:
Fuel duty rates will increase by 0.5 pence per litre above indexation on 1 April 2010.


Can someone please explain to me what this actually means?

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 21:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
Pete317 wrote:
Quote:
Fuel duty rates will increase by 0.5 pence per litre above indexation on 1 April 2010.


Can someone please explain to me what this actually means?


I can't explain but I'd also like to point out in the reports I read they kept using the term "in real terms from 2010" - whenever they use "real terms" they are hiding something or up to something


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 21:48 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
mmltonge wrote:
I can't explain but I'd also like to point out in the reports I read they kept using the term "in real terms from 2010" - whenever they use "real terms" they are hiding something or up to something


Could it actually mean the cost rise due to inflation plus 0.5p?
If the inflation index is, say, 3% then the increase would be 3% of £1.00 (say) = 3p, plus 0.5p = 3.5p per litre. Does this sound right?

To make matters worse, the fuel price increase is one of the major drivers of inflation - the more the fuel price increase the higher the inflation, the more the fuel price increase.... :shock:

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 00:11 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
PeterE wrote:

http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/news/nol/sha ... report.pdf

The VED table is on page 131 of 222.



2g of CO2 is going cost my wife £115, her 2002 car puts out 227g/km you see. The fact it only does about 3500 miles a year will not be taken into account. At one point we did fantasise about parking it outside Downing street and setting fire to it to make a sufficiently ironic statement.

This government is going is going to cause a backlash which will harm environmental causes massively.

Now where is that incinerator? I have some plastic bottles which are just too much effort to wash and put in the recycle bin.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 08:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Why do the Government always make everything so complicated. If they just raised tax on fuel and scrapped road tax then:

- evasion would be pretty difficult
- an individual's cost would then be related to the (so called) pollution created
- people with larger cars would not be penalised if they only drove low mileages
- no additional collection resource would be needed.

A retrospective tax on ownership is extremely unfair.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:35 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Well, I think it's time for a trip to the Auzzie embacy.. I have 130 points (min. 100) so...

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 13:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
Sixy_the_red wrote:
Well, I think it's time for a trip to the Auzzie embacy.. I have 130 points (min. 100) so...


From what I understand Australia aint much better


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 13:55 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
mmltonge wrote:
Sixy_the_red wrote:
Well, I think it's time for a trip to the Auzzie embacy.. I have 130 points (min. 100) so...


From what I understand Australia aint much better


I have good friends living out there who would beg to differ...

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 15:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
Ah well I'm going on the words of an Aussie who rented a room at my place for a year and a friend who spent 3 months out there.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 15:22 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Fair comment! :lol:

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 21:30 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
So imagine a 2001 car that is only worth £800 (which isn't far off for some models) but happens to be in a high emissions band.. Is the owner going to pay 50% of the car's value for a year's road tax?

And if he's not paying road tax, he may as well not bother with MOT and insurance either...

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 02:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
Johnnytheboy wrote:
I particularly like p
aying so much VED when I only use my car for ~4000 miles a year.


Likewise..........
I use my "Gas guzzler" during the summer months only. I leave it in the Garage during the winter NOT because of any TAX, but to preserve it!

Since October my "Gas guzzler" has not produced ONE OUNCE of Co2 and will not do so until April or May.
Like you Johnny, mine does a similar annual mileage. Many 1000cc cars produce much more Co2 annually than MY "Gas Guzzler"!!!!!!!! So you greenies stick THAT in your pipe and smoke it...Get rid of your polluting Micras and walk!

It's a Tax on ownership and that's plainly wrong. It blatantly doesn't allow for intelligent usage.
I used to leave my "Road Tax" (what an unPC name that now is) running through winter despite not using the car, but NO MORE! From now on, what I don't use I'm going to claim back!
......and they don't even allow you to select your usage anymore, It's either, 12 months tax...or 6 months (+ a premium charge). If they were serious they would make owning and using a large and a small car sensibly both easier and cheaper.....

SCRAP the Road Tax!..........The Government takes a whopping 300% tax on fuel alone. What the hell more do they want more for? Allow us some flexibility and we could help your aims maybe!

I gave up Smoking (high tax) years ago........ Next to go will be ..the drink! (high tax) after that......the meals out and trips to tourist haunts in the UK!

Giving that at least 90% of my annual mileage of around 4500 miles in my:.."Gas Guzzler" is now out of the UK, and therefore my tourist spending is spent somewhere else. The car will be the last thing to go...

Mr Darling....."Darling"...You will have to shut down the entire UK economy first before I give up my car!.......OK?

:evil:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.134s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]