Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Jun 04, 2026 04:52

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: The Weakest Link?
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 14:32 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hampshire/7499376.stm

BBC News wrote:
Anne Robinson banned from driving

Television presenter Anne Robinson has been banned from driving for six months after admitting a speeding offence.

The Weakest Link presenter was not at Portsmouth Magistrates' Court in Hampshire to hear the charge.

The 63-year-old admitted by post that she drove at 43mph (69km/h) in a 30mph (48km/h) zone in Anglesey Road, Portsmouth, on 8 August last year.

She was fined £100 with £50 costs. She received four penalty points, which were added to the 9 on her licence.

Robinson had been caught by a speed camera as she drove her Audi A3 car out of the city after disembarking a ferry from the Isle of Wight.

Michael McGoldrick, mitigating, said Robinson had not seen the camera as she was disorientated by the road system on her first ever visit there.

I am sorry she won't have a very pleasant memory of her first visit to Portsmouth
Magistrate Peter Mellor

"It was a Sunday morning," he said.

"Following the signs to the A3 she found herself heading to Gunwharf Quays (retail centre) and realised she was off course.

"She turned around and while trying to leave Portsmouth she failed to spot that she was in a restricted speed area."

Mr McGoldrick said the disqualification would cause "significant inconvenience" to Robinson as she travelled between 40,000 and 50,000 miles a year in her car.

He added: "My client accepts that she will be disqualified and she wanted me to apologise for what happened and apologise for taking up the court's time."

Magistrate Peter Mellor gave her four penalty points, which meant she was disqualified under totting up as she already had nine points for three previous speeding convictions.

They were in September 2005, March 2006 and June 2007.

"I am sorry she won't have a very pleasant memory of her first visit to Portsmouth," said Mr Mellor.

Hmm. it appears that speeding convictions have not deterred Anne from speeding, which according to the SCP's is the manner in which they work!

Perhaps Brunstrom was investigating the wrong thing when he launched an enquiry into alleged anti-Welsh comments by Anne on her show.
Clearly cameras are the weakest link - it's time to say goodbye if it takes 3 years to get a speeding driver off the road... how many people has she maimed in the meantime??

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Weakest Link?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:58 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
Absolutely... BUT - 4 convictions in 3 year (ie in 150,000 miles of her driving) which means that someone with similar experience doing a more typical 12,000 per annum would take 12 years to collect the same points. Does this seem fair?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Weakest Link?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:20 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
Besides the point, but why didn't anne robinson employ someone like nick freeman?

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Weakest Link?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 12:27 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 11:19
Posts: 1795
That's the conclusion that Rose wotsit the mathematician came to. She said even extremely careful drivers that did a high mileage would be caught. Persistent speeders could by luck avoid any points and everyone else fell somewhere in between.

Most of the anti speeders claim you always know if you are over the limit but it isn't the case. There is a road near here that is nsl but with street lamps but it isn't easy to tell by eye whether they are far enough apart not to cause the limit to be 30. It has a speed camera on it which isn't set below 40. The scp don't know for sure what limit is on the road so set it above 60! It is now out of use. How the hell are you supposed to tell if there isn't a fixed distance between the lamps or warning signs that 30 applies because of the lamps? If you do 30 along there you'll be punted into the hedge as the majority bob along at 45-55. I am sure the old regs were clearer - if the street lamps are less than a certain distance apart, lamp to lamp, 30 mph applied. Now it waffles on about systems of lamps having to be within 183m! It is even less clear as you could have 2 close together, do these apply to those lighting junctions, those on the same side of the road or what? It is very unclear.

I think there should be a campaign to insist on 30mph repeaters in all 30 mph zones and also have 30 mph signs where the lamps conform to this pattern so the limit is completely unambiguous. Alternatively the street lamp provision should be removed and all nsl roads are automatically 60 unless signed otherwise with proper limit signing.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.022s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]