Lum wrote:
Trams are shit.
They have all the disadvantages of a bus (subject to congestion, having to deal with idiot drivers, having to avoid idiot pedestrians), subject to low speed limits in the city.
Funny, my experience with trams is that they usually go on congestion avoiding routes and stop all other traffic to let them go through. On their own alignment they can go 50mph.
Quote:
They also have all the disadvantages of a train, namely your route is determined by your rails and there is no ability to go around any obstacles or incidents that may happen, and crappy brakes so if someone steps out in front of the tram, they get hit (some many not see this as a disadvantage

So all passengers know where the tram will go and where it will stop?
The brakes in modern trams are so good that the driver has to use discretion in an emergency as to whether it really warrants the full application of magnetic brakes, which can stop the tram very quickly, and could subject all the passengers to injuries as bad as the person about to be hit.
Quote:
The only possible advantage trams have is sometimes the rails go through pedestrian areas and thus you can avoid the cars, but a bit of red and white paint lets you lay a bus lane through a pedestrian area, and it's an awful lot cheaper than laying new rails.
Trams will always take the same sweep path and can use narrower streets. Not to mention all pedestrians know exactly where to avoid.
Quote:
I am so glad Liverpool never managed to get enough funding to built it's planned tram system, just extend the existing underground system, idiots!
At 5 times the cost? Well I'll admit it works in London.