Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Nov 16, 2025 16:36

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:23 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 11:31
Posts: 46
I was thinking about these average speed cameras on my drive into work this morning, as the subject had come up in conversation over the weekend.

If they deployed on long stretches of A roads, then I can see this actually leading to speeding without being caught!

Largely, the area I am in, Vale of Evesham/Worcester the biggest problem drivers have are the other drivers that will drive everywhere at between 35 and 45 regardless of the speed limits. Now, on a NSL road, if a driver manages to overtake after being stuck behind a 'clow coach' for some time, then driving in excess of 60mph for some distance, depending on how long they were held up for, would not affect their average speed!

I am no mathematician, but I bet some our there will be able to more or less calculate how far they can travel in excess of the speed limit!

We need, where appropriate, proper police working all areas and doing what they used to do, stop people who were driving stupidly or dangerously. This did not necessarily include driving at 5 mph or so over the advised limit!

My husband drives a lorry and was caught the other week, driving along a bypass that is not marked as being a dual carriageway, but is wide enough to be and is usually treated as such by most road users. He was doing 50 - a mobile camera unit got him and, of course, there is no discretion. The likelihood is that if that had been a policeman on normal duty, they would not have bothered about him driving at 50 along this stretch of road, when legally and stupidly he should have been doing 40mph, unless he was driving dangerously.

Many lorry drivers find that 40 mph on long stretches of A roads is very monotonous and hypnotic and find their concentration wandering. I think most of us do, especially when we are travelling a well known route. I am sure many people drive to work each day and on arriving cannot remember driving a particular stretch of road. Drivers who are on the road most of the day and are expected to driver between 10 and 20 mph slower than all other road users do get frustrated at the tailbacks, if they stick to the limit they are supposed to; they also get sick of seeing the totally crazy manouvres some will undertake to try and get past, hence putting a lot of people in danger! Cameras do not see things like this!

These drivers need their licence to work and it is not hard to accrue 9 points in a fairly short space of time, if you are not watching your speed, instead of the road, particularly when expected to drive so much slower than the road dictates, whatever vehicle you are driving. Having these discrepancies in speed on the same stretch of road is crazy and far more dangerous in many cases, especially as many car drivers do not realise that lorries are supposed to drive slower.

I am sure someone will come back with, 'Well, it is in the Highway Code' and so it maybe, but how many drivers who have been driving for years, ever pick up an up to date copy of the highway code or check it out online? Very few I should imagine and at the end of the day that is small consolation for the family who loses a loved one, or several, because of a dangerous manouvre carried out in frustration?

Even if drivers do know that lorries are not supposed exceed 40 mph on A roads, that in itself is likely to lead to people emerging dangerously from side roads, in order not to get caught up behind a slow vehicle!

:? This country has gone totally bonkers!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 15:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Turn the radio off. Leave the cd collection at home. Don't talk to passengers.
If you are so distracted that you fail to see speed limit signs, then you are a risk to others.
The only way you are NOT going to be collared for speeding over a distance is if you slow RIGHT down as you come to the next checkpoint...and stay slow.
I know I've said this before: Things ain't going to get better. Speed cameras are not going to go away, they are a fixture. They will evolve but they WILL NOT go away. Gatso changed to truvelo, and now to specs. Specs is a multi-use system and can be used as speed, anpr and plain video. If the gov is going to fund the widespread roll-out of specs, then all will change to specs. With road pricing on the way, I would guess that specs roll-out will be very fast...you didn't think that a multi-billion pound wideband fibre-optic comms system had been installed along major roads to have nice info signs did you ?
You can protest all you like to your mp (etc), but the people running GBR 2008 are not elected and couldn't give a hoot about you.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 15:54 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
jomukuk wrote:
The only way you are NOT going to be collared for speeding over a distance is if you slow RIGHT down as you come to the next checkpoint...and stay slow.

You are basically correct here but I would express it another way. Something people might consider (not me, of course) would be to recce. the route they intend to use for a fast run noting the camera locations. Go through the first SPECS and stop. Later drive the route at whatever speed safe in the knowledge they won't be transgressing the average. Very safe - not.

You think that people won't do it? Think again. People are very clever at finding ways around what authority wants to impose on them.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 18:30 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Quote:
Orwell himself never imagined anything quite as observant as the Specs 3 camera. It represents the probable future of British speed cameras, and by communicating thousands of times a second with identical machines arranged in networks across the national road system it will be able to measure motorists' average speeds, detours included, and fine them if they ever break the limit.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article4916392.ece


Quote:
The UK will shortly begin deploying a new generation of the SPECs average speed enforcement cameras with the ability to track drivers on all routes for up to 50kms throughout whole areas of cities or suburban areas. Clusters of up to 50 cameras, positioned over 20kms apart, will work together to monitor entry and exit points so that it will be impossible to evade detection.

In a Q&A session after his keynote address at yesterday’s A New Strategy for Road Safety Post 2010, one-day conference in London, Fitzpatrick said ‘Trials have shown very good results. Wherever there are average speed camera signs, traffic moves at a uniform speed and crashes reduce.’ He went on to tell the conference, organised by Transport Times, that approval for the new generation of cameras, is imminent, following trials in London and Northern Ireland. And he predicted that the new equipment “will give a more sophisticated edge to cameras than the blunt instrument we have at the moment.”

Fitzpatrick pointed to the progress the UK has made in reducing road casualties since 2000 when the government first published its road safety strategy. “Compared to the 1994-1998 average, we’ve cut combined deaths and serious injuries by 36 per cent, and are on course to meet our 2010 targets.

“The 2007 figures showed that road deaths in the UK fell below 3,000 for the first time in more than 80 years. That’s a real achievement, and it’s testament to the work of a huge number of professionals working in road safety – police, local authorities, charities, highways authorities, emergency services, the automotive industry and many others. But 2,946 deaths is still far too high.

Among a range of initiatives, Fitzpatrick highlighted that the problem of speeding will remain a key priority. “Indeed, one of the biggest challenges of the next decade will be to make speeding as unacceptable to mainstream society, as drink-driving has become,” he said. “Although there are still far too many drivers who regularly break speed limits, we are slowly winning the battle against speed. That process must continue, backed by speed cameras where they are effective, by a police force focused on successful enforcement, and by THINK! advertising emphasising the message that speeding is not only dangerous, but also unacceptable.”

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 18:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
WildCat wrote:
But does the bend come after the summit or before it. That particular incident caused when he literally took off on the hump - bouncing into the oncoming car.

Like you say.. you do not know the road. We do. Full of cyclists.. horseriders. You would be illegal und still pushing your luck to keep you und others alive at 80 mph. I do happen to understand the difference between "careless" und "dangerous" behaviour.

Yes.. we enjoy driving .. we enjoy a spirited :legorally: at a fairly invigorating mph :wink:


But we support common sense.. safety led driving.. speed awareness/DIS courses

We do not support OTT or plainly unsafe speeding in a car or on a motorbike as a substitute for an orgasm nor should we support such plain stupid behaviour.

We do not support using Handy in hand when :cloud9: :legorally: ing along.

We do not support driving whilst tired or impaired by drink or any drugs.

We do not support driving whilst uninsured .. without licence .. in a defective vehicle.

We most certainly do not support speed cameras as they do not at all cop these inconsiderate thugs ... the ones really responsible for about 66% of all KSI und not the chap pinged at few blips above the lolly sign.

Which steer back to topic after making a few ''"three" point """ turns und perhaps ending up in the same direction :yikes: (Our neighbour failed her L test over that! :roll: Nerves.. :roll:)

The proposed speed cams will only cop those who are legal owners of their vehicles. Almost all of these will have fluctuated up/down over the distance.. but these cameras will not be measuring between cam 1 to cam 2. It will be the whole set of them recording the average speed from start to finish - which mean that your 27 mph between one pair count for nothing if it blip to 34 mph between cam 2 to 3.. dip back to 30 mph between cams 3 to 4 und then up to 36 mph between cams 4 to 5 when the driver see higher lolly sign ahead und presses just slightly on seeing this in "anticipation" :roll:

It will not be improving driving standards in all reality. :roll:


Oh hell, Vrenchen!

Can't you reply to any post without all the extraneous rambling and (seemingly) we know best attitude?

I'm not surprised it prompted a bit of plain speaking from a few people over on PH. It does get a bit tiresome.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 19:25 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
jomukuk wrote:
Don't worry.
Since the new "speed camera" system will be also recording the numbers, calculating the speed between whatever points are chosen, checking what roads the vehicle can have driven down because it took so long to get between two points, and then dumping the data back to another system (the specs system operates in an "area", each area has a control point to which the separate cameras connect (a nice bomproof double walled brick bunker with a 6 inch-thick concrete roof))
After all this, the chance of it working 24/7 (or even 12/7) are pretty remote.
Don't forget, while the polos and police are crowing about how it will stop accidents and reduce speeding, the whole point of the system has got little to do with either of those.
The major point of it is to record what, where and when.



The great Sir Jimmy Young reminded us all about the recored to date in terms of lost data which can enable some to steal an identity.

I foresee a rise in cloned plates etc .. chuckaway cars..


Quote:
According to the police, the anpr system is the best weapon they have against crime.



Ah,.. the ever so "accurate" MID. I have every faith in in all this .. NO NOT REALLY! :shock: I work in the NHS after all .. :popcorn: The only records I know and now trust to be accurate .. are.. the ones .. for the patients I treat under BUPA.. :bunker:

Quote:
According to a serving police inspector: "we'll be able to tell where you fart in a few years"


ARHGHHHHH! NO!

It's C-C-C - Oh -O TWO ..

They will tax us all for burps.. farts ..and satisfying dumps whilst reading Mongiblet's latest in the littlest room in the house. :shock:



They already planning to tax cattle. MOOOO! because of speedy related belches per second.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 23:51 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
The thing is that over a 15-mile journey there are numerous roundabouts, traffic lights, junctions, 40-everywhere drivers and such that will reduce your average speed to below the limit, even if most of the time you're bombing down country lanes at 70. In urban areas this system would be completely pointless, because the average speed is well below 30, even though most people exceed 30 when they actually get the opportunity to move.

Which leads to the conclusion that the only place this could realistically be used would be motorways, grade-separated dual carriageways, and long stretches of single carriageway with no junctions. In other words, the places where speeding is least likely to be dangerous...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 07:15 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
orange wrote:
The thing is that over a 15-mile journey there are numerous roundabouts, traffic lights, junctions, 40-everywhere drivers and such that will reduce your average speed to below the limit, even if most of the time you're bombing down country lanes at 70. In urban areas this system would be completely pointless, because the average speed is well below 30, even though most people exceed 30 when they actually get the opportunity to move.

Which leads to the conclusion that the only place this could realistically be used would be motorways, grade-separated dual carriageways, and long stretches of single carriageway with no junctions. In other words, the places where speeding is least likely to be dangerous...



Well :scratchchin: Of course that the only place where they can use them on motorways/straight dual carriageways or the long straight A515 or some rural bits of the A6 as it run parallel through High Peak.


I have no real problem with the 40 mph driver in reality though. They still at 40 mph in the 20/30 mph :wink:

But you miss the point of the things. They work in pairs. Measuring the average speed from cam1 to cam 2 .. then cam 2 to cam 3 und so on.

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 07:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
No.
Getting-it, you're not !
Common fallacy: Speed camera = catching speeders.
Modern society: The new "speed camera" systems do EVERYTHING that the gov needs.
The system can record where your car was/is, and where your car has been/is going/is coming from.
It can calculate your average speed over a set distance, sure.
But if you take 1 hour to cover 1 mile it also enables that to be noted.
So, not only how fast you covered the distance, but also how slow. If anyone wants to know.
So if you're on the A43 and go from system 1/03 then go past system 1/04 a minute later that's recorded.
So you don't go through system 1/05....but appear an hour later on the A428 going through system 4/04.
You didn't "do" system 4/03....so you must have gone the country route through Denton....
As a means of finding-out who MAY have done a burglary in Denton....or just who was in that area.
Now, if you were in an organisation that could also check records of which mobile phone was in that area.....

Get it ?

Although I also note that the new police radios are pretty good at tracking the coppers as well....

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 21:37 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
jomukuk wrote:
No.
Getting-it, you're not !
Common fallacy: Speed camera = catching speeders.
Modern society: The new "speed camera" systems do EVERYTHING that the gov needs.
The system can record where your car was/is, and where your car has been/is going/is coming from.
It can calculate your average speed over a set distance, sure.
But if you take 1 hour to cover 1 mile it also enables that to be noted.
So, not only how fast you covered the distance, but also how slow. If anyone wants to know.
So if you're on the A43 and go from system 1/03 then go past system 1/04 a minute later that's recorded.
So you don't go through system 1/05....but appear an hour later on the A428 going through system 4/04.
You didn't "do" system 4/03....so you must have gone the country route through Denton....
As a means of finding-out who MAY have done a burglary in Denton....or just who was in that area.
Now, if you were in an organisation that could also check records of which mobile phone was in that area.....

Get it ?

Although I also note that the new police radios are pretty good at tracking the coppers as well....



Liebchen. I know you to be correct in worry.

The 2007 Oscar winning foreign film..

"Das Leben der anderen!

Was based on true story.

Watch it .. it not Bambi who make you cry here.. but lost liberty.

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 21:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
orange wrote:
Which leads to the conclusion that the only place this could realistically be used would be motorways, grade-separated dual carriageways, and long stretches of single carriageway with no junctions. In other words, the places where speeding is least likely to be dangerous...

I presume the cameras in urban areas would only actually track your speed on sections with a consistent speed limit and no intervening traffic lights or roundabouts. There are already SPECS on built-up 30 and 40 limit roads in Nottingham - so in principle it's possible to see how the idea could be extended to other urban locations.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 22:24 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
PeterE wrote:
orange wrote:
Which leads to the conclusion that the only place this could realistically be used would be motorways, grade-separated dual carriageways, and long stretches of single carriageway with no junctions. In other words, the places where speeding is least likely to be dangerous...

I presume the cameras in urban areas would only actually track your speed on sections with a consistent speed limit and no intervening traffic lights or roundabouts. There are already SPECS on built-up 30 and 40 limit roads in Nottingham - so in principle it's possible to see how the idea could be extended to other urban locations.



It the ring road .. which cross Derbyshire und Nottinghamshire . nicht?


It cash cow in wee small hours.. but zero return at high peak time :roll:


But this system per jomukuk .. go the extra mile on invasion of travelalong space.


I can state from experience of studies in Moscow und Leipzig when Cold War active.. that the experience of being watched 24/7 ist just not pleasant. We still have that instinct to warn of danger. I can say it get pronounced under such measure :roll:

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 07:04 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
http://news.aol.co.uk/big-brother-database-plan-awful/article/20081014173716801321223

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 08:59 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
This will only work on really decent roads, basically top-notch SC and better. As someone said above, even the odd roundabout will render this useless.

I really don't hang about in my weekend car, and the long-term average speed on the trip computer is currently 35 mph.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 11:31
Posts: 46
Apparently in Hereford and Worcester speed cameras (all types, I presume) have reduced fatal accidents from 33 to 11 in Worcestershire and something like 10 to 3 in Herefordshire!

I heard this on the car radio as I was pulling into work and my immediate response was 'bollocks'!

The only thing that will effectively prevent accidents, fatal or otherwise is proper, discretionary policing. No cameras can possibly be 100% accurate as they cannot see what is happening in the area at the time, as with the person who got done by a red light camera when he moved over the line to allow an emergency vehicle through! Some people will argue this, others won't, so how many innocent people have been fined and got points on their licence due to this big brother system!

I agree with the poster who said that being watched 24/7 is not pleasant and I am already paranoid about it!

Somehow this has to be stopped or we will all end up living as the Russians did 20 or 30 years ago!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 18:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
If you go through all the legislation (RIP act, anti-terror acts) they all feature serious restrictions on ordinary peoples liberty. Even if "only" by being observed. The much trotted-out line "if you have nothing to hide...." is hardly to the point. The FACT of permanent observation is enough.
All this information has to be stored.
On most government installations access to the data is pretty easy....various gov agencies have access....and local councils have access to alarming amounts of info...
All pretty standard, except gov IT installations are, basically, garbage. Expensive, antique and unreliable. Not to mention, easily defeated by the large amounts of idiots who take the data home (usb sticks) or just forget they had it with them (laptops/trains) or had it stolen (trains/cars) or just posted it to whoever (cds)
To date, info about 70/80 million people has been lost, stolen or given-away (doubtless many people have been lost twice, or thrice)
So, all this information to guarantee our security is stored insecurely and transported the same.
In all this, people see the info about another "better" speed camera system.....oh well, another boring speed camera (yawwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnn)
The specs system proposed is unlike any other.
It will check speed.
Yes.
So, chortle away about how you will fool it...
Look at it from my point of view.
the system is not intended to be used primarily for speed checks.
It **can** be used to check speed.
Its primary use is to gather data.
It is an anpr system, with high=speed data links.
It is a video system, exceptionally good video, with infrared illuminators. It can photograph the driver of a vehicle at night with good clarity.
Maybe I'm paranoid, but I don't think so.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 21:07 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
jomukuk wrote:
It is a video system, exceptionally good video, with infrared illuminators. It can photograph the driver of a vehicle at night with good clarity.
Maybe I'm paranoid, but I don't think so.


Maybe I'm being paranoid - BUT - could this be the prelude to a system of road charging ---bring it in nationwide -


You've got - the vehicle registrations
the roads the car drove on and distance driven
the time the car was on the road

Enter Mr Computer - car ABC1234 was on the A1234 at 1255 - rate per mile (at that time ) = 50p/mile - for 25 miles -that's £12.5 --thank you for payment - or next time we'll send out an ANPR unit to clamp you .----Have a nice Day

The future of driving in UK TOMORROW .UK.COM.?????????????????????


THINK - IT COULD BE TOMORROW .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 00:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Vehicle registration: AB09ABC
Driving licence number: YOYO123999
0000z : 0130z 10 miles @ 0.50p/mile = £5.00
0130z : 0245z 95 miles @ 0.50p/mile = £47.50
95 miles in 75 minutes in a 60 mph nsl = average speed 75.96 mph
Speed infringement.
Fine £60.00
Points 3
Existing licence points 9
Mandatory disqualification 6 months @ 11 August 2008 @0245z
0245z : 0453z 120 miles @ 0.50p/mile = £60.00
Driving while disqualified = £350.00
Driving without insurance = £1200.00
Costs = £1000.00
Please arrange for vehicle registration: AB09ABC to be impounded.
Destruction to be by crushing.
Cost of crushing = £75.00
Removal of hazardous substances from vehicle prior to crushing = £ 25.00
Custodial sentence for driving while disqualified = 6 months

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 08:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Quote:
The DVLA has started preparing for the possible production of driving licences with microchips on them.

European law is currently being updated to allow member states to add chips to driving licences. At the same time, the DVLA is upgrading its driving licence card production facility to address the increasing threat to the driving licence from counterfeiters.

The agency has recently signed a deal for the supply of hardware and software to produce a more secure, laser engraved polycarbonate driving licence.

And the contract award notice for the deal, issued last month, states: "A likely future development is the inclusion of the chip."

The DVLA told silicon.com in a statement: "There is a requirement for the equipment to be flexible enough in order to have the capability to cater for future operational and security requirements and volumes."

At the moment EU members are prohibited from adding chips to licences. But EC proposals for a third directive on driving licences, currently under negotiation, include the option for member states to include a microchip.

The DVLA told silicon.com in a statement: "A decision on whether the UK would want to include a microchip on the driving licence has not yet been taken. Any such decision would require ministerial approval beforehand."

The DVLA said it does not know when the new directive will be adopted - and even once it is, governments have six years to implement it.

But the DVLA's 2005-06 Business Plan notes: "The possible inclusion of a microchip on the licences, as proposed in the draft Third EU Directive on driving licences, may provide an opportunity for DVLA to improve further the security of the licence photocard."

It adds: "We are procuring new card production equipment with the capability of delivering smartcard licences that will also address the physical security of our card production."


Hmmm...A remote licence reader becomes a possibility....

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 19:35 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
... and this from the people who couldn't get even the simple photocard licence right so we need to produce the paper part as well.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.035s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]