Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 09:58

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 259 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 07:30 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
RobinXe wrote:
It is quite amazing seeing the "web-cyclists" become so fastidious about the interpretation of statistics when it suits them, when the same are so frequently so obtuse about them when it suits their agenda.


Could you expand on that please, Robin

By the way my comment on pushing pavement cyclists was not meant as an incitement to violent - just an indication of how vulnerable cyclists are and thus how foolish they are to mix with pedestrians.

Incidentally I don't have an Agenda. I have a Mercian and a Ribble and a cheap Halford's own-brand, but not an Agenda. And I cycle on the road not the web :D

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 14:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Sure, I was referring specifically to weepej's comments about inappropriate data sets and the failure to factor in cyclist-miles. Similar questions have been raised about studies supporting speed cameras/lower speed limits/bikes make roads safer/etc and he has not been willing to get nearly so excited by them, since if the government says so, it must be true, so long as they are agreeing with him.

_________________
Regulation without education merely creates more criminals.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 09:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
RobinXe wrote:
Sure, I was referring specifically to weepej's comments about inappropriate data sets and the failure to factor in cyclist-miles. Similar questions have been raised about studies supporting speed cameras/lower speed limits/bikes make roads safer/etc and he has not been willing to get nearly so excited by them, since if the government says so, it must be true, so long as they are agreeing with him.


I don't think I've ever said miles travelled should be discounted when looking at stats*. However you'd be squeeking if they figured races and stunt shows into car crash statistics.

*I do think is disingenuous to figure in motorway miles when discussing car on ped action.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:28 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
weepej wrote:
*I do think is disingenuous to figure in motorway miles when discussing car on ped action.



I agree that motorway miles are not relevant here - not sure about disingenuous, but certainly not correct.

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:48 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
weepej wrote:
graball wrote:
This must say something about how cyclists can be a danger to themselves if 9191 were injured involving NO OTHER VEHICLES ........


You do know those stats include all cycling releated injuries, including mountain biking, which as a sport is about as risky as you can get.



Fair point; does anyone have figures for on-road/commute related without the "leisure/ off-road" stats?

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 15:32 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
hairyben wrote:
[Fair point; does anyone have figures for on-road/commute related without the "leisure/ off-road" stats?


I found th se figures for Scotland in 2004 at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/933/0031860.pdf

Thirteen per cent of cycling accidents where reported to have occurred on the main
road. Adults were much more likely than children to have a cycling accident on the
main road. There were large numbers of accidents on the pavement (29%), and 43%
of all child accidents occurred on the pavement. The greatest proportion of accidents
(41%) occurred off-road and, therefore, were not captured by STATS19. Adults were
more likely to have off-road accidents than children

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 15:35 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
So does that mean cycling on the road is safer than cycling on the pavement, especially for children?

(In Scotland, at least?)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 15:49 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Johnnytheboy wrote:
So does that mean cycling on the road is safer than cycling on the pavement, especially for children?

(In Scotland, at least?)


No. As presented those statistics are meaningless. Which begs the question why I bothered to present them :(

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 17:24 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
The results do seem a little counterintuitive...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 20:13 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Johnnytheboy wrote:
The results do seem a little counterintuitive...


Not really, pavements are full of holes, lamp posts, postboxes and pedestrians, they are very narrow in places and uneven, and you've got to cross side roads by negotiating kerbs. Simply going slowly on a pushbike is enough to make many people fall off of their own accord, and falling off a pushbike will pretty much always result in some injury or other.

I imagine you are much more likely to come a cropper riding on the pavements than riding on the roads.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 08:35 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
weepej wrote:
Johnnytheboy wrote:
The results do seem a little counterintuitive...


Not really, pavements are full of holes, lamp posts, postboxes and pedestrians, they are very narrow in places and uneven, and you've got to cross side roads by negotiating kerbs. Simply going slowly on a pushbike is enough to make many people fall off of their own accord, and falling off a pushbike will pretty much always result in some injury or other.

I imagine you are much more likely to come a cropper riding on the pavements than riding on the roads.



Which does beg the question as to why folk people do ride on the pavements :scratchchin:

Mad Doc has his claws on some hospital stats from the A&E of the Trust he work in.

These show that plenty of accidents occur when cyclists ride on the pavements.. to the pedestrians.... :popcorn: who are the most vulnerable of all.

But then I note from a quick skim through that the poor pedestrian does not even get a mention of the injuries inflicted on them by these "cyclists".

Oh.. und by the way that wus I married to will be probably post up how one almost made me a widow in 2005. Mad Doc was walking (yes .. he does occasionally. He not allowed to drive Jag or Stag or Moggie Maniac (aka Morris 1000) on the pavement. :wink:

Anyway .. he walk. Past some trench for gas works. Pavement cyclist pushes past him und knocks him into this trench. He cut his leg - narrowly missed an artery.

I had to dance attendance on him.. Pooor deearrr! He could not even find the strength to stir the milk into his tea. :roll:

So .. will we say those who choose to ride on a pavement .. then bleat about how they should be regarded as normal traffic .. yet never attempt to blend in with the traffic are "bad "cyclists""


You bet we do. :yesyes:

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 09:14 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
As I said those stats, as they stand, are meaningless. We need know what proportion of cycling miles are on road/pavement/non-road. Also it is likely that it is the less confident and younger cyclists who more often use the pavements.

I take issue with "pedestrians are the most vulnerable of all". That accolade goes to cyclists which is why they are encouraged to wear helmets whereas a baseball cap is regarded as sufficient protection for a pedestrian.

And cars do frequently drive on the pavement in order to park.

:D :lol: :twisted: :angel: :fastasleep: :bunker:

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 21:10 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
dcbwhaley wrote:
And cars do frequently drive on the pavement in order to park.


Or to steal a march in queue; there's a road near me where cars are frequently driven half on half off the pavement so they can undercut a queue and take a left turn.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 23:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
y weepej on Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:10 pm

dcbwhaley wrote:And cars do frequently drive on the pavement in order to park.

Or to steal a march in queue; there's a road near me where cars are frequently driven half on half off the pavement so they can undercut a queue and take a left turn.
Quote:



That can be a result of bad planning by the highways dept. There are pavements round by me which are about 12foot wide and never hardly have a pedestrian on them but if they were a couple of foot narrower it would enable left turning traffic to flow easily, instead of adding five minutes or more to getting through a set of lights simply because the two or three cars waiting to go straight on are holding up dozens which would otherwise be able to turn left.

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 23:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
graball wrote:
That can be a result of bad planning by the highways dept. There are pavements round by me which are about 12foot wide and never hardly have a pedestrian on them but if they were a couple of foot narrower it would enable left turning traffic to flow easily, instead of adding five minutes or more to getting through a set of lights simply because the two or three cars waiting to go straight on are holding up dozens which would otherwise be able to turn left.



Ha ha!!

No that's the result of people deciding to drive their cars on the pavement!

I see you're happy to excuse it when people in cars do it, let's see if you can you excuse it when people on cycles do it.

Go on, you know you can.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 23:46 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
weepej wrote:
graball wrote:
That can be a result of bad planning by the highways dept. There are pavements round by me which are about 12foot wide and never hardly have a pedestrian on them but if they were a couple of foot narrower it would enable left turning traffic to flow easily, instead of adding five minutes or more to getting through a set of lights simply because the two or three cars waiting to go straight on are holding up dozens which would otherwise be able to turn left.



Ha ha!!

No that's the result of people deciding to drive their cars on the pavement!

I see you're happy to excuse it when people in cars do it, let's see if you can you excuse it when people on cycles do it.

Go on, you know you can.


I'm not happy to excuse it for either group - is that OK?

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:09 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
prof beard wrote:
I'm not happy to excuse it for either group - is that OK?



Absolutely, but what will graball say, he's already defended people in cars using the pavement to steal a march on a queue of cars, what about cyclists?

Come on graball!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:30 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
weepej wrote:
prof beard wrote:
I'm not happy to excuse it for either group - is that OK?



Absolutely, but what will graball say, he's already defended people in cars using the pavement to steal a march on a queue of cars, what about cyclists?

Come on graball!


I think his 40 years "experience" of driving is what makes it safe. But that would mean that my fifty-five years cycling experience would make it even safer for me to cycle on the pavement. :)

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 19:19 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
You are both WRONG, I don't condone driving or cycling on the pavement and I challenge you to point out where I say that! What I did say is that, very often, pavements are far too wide for their actrual usaeage and if, in those cases, they were narrower, people wouldn't have to drive on the pavement. Can you not understand that???

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bad cyclists
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 19:36 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
graball wrote:
You are both WRONG, I don't condone driving or cycling on the pavement and I challenge you to point out where I say that! What I did say is that, very often, pavements are far too wide for their actrual usaeage and if, in those cases, they were narrower, people wouldn't have to drive on the pavement. Can you not understand that???


Mea culpa After rereading your post I apologize unreservedly :bighand:

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 259 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.172s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]