Quote:
It is interesting that, despite this plethora of expenditure, most contributors counted little more than the cost of fuel when comparing the costs of motoring and public transport
Well, (and you know this perfectly well I am sure)!
That is because car "Ownership" and car "use" (on the marginal journey) are, by most car owners, accounted in separate columns (as it were)
The descision to "own" a car is considererd separatly from the descision to make any individual journey.
as a result the choice is between "Not having a car and being totally dependent on PT" and "having a car and judging each journey on its individual economic merits". In the second scenario PT almost always compares poorly for someone who has
already made the descision to own a car.Sure, most people will appear to save transport costs by going "Car free" but the main reason for this is that you will simply make less journeys (certainly less spontainious ones) added to which you may find higher costs elswhere in your life (needing to use more expensive accomodation near to stations, shops etc) and other costs which are less easy to quantify such as having to live in grotty inner-city accomodation in order to have good PT/Work links (Of course not ALL inner city accomodation is grotty, but if you can afford the nice stuff you wouldnt be having this discussion

), having your travel options severly limited, having to travel in less comfortable enviroments and so on and the fact that you may well end up spending a lot more of your life travelling (what will you spend less time doing to compensate? Sleeping perhaps. Is that good for you??)
By analogy, most people could "save" money over buying/renting a house by finding a cheap long-stay hotel/boarding house to live in, but I suspect few would make that choice. (unless it was forced on them)