Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jun 03, 2026 10:03

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Discussion Forums » Improving Road Safety

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
SafeSpeed
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:30 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
stackmonkey wrote:
What i perhaps should have added was that when i catch myself doing this, i do check(i.e. not increase) my speed and sometimes slow down to allow the other person to pass quickly and safely.


(my emboldening)

It's better to 'almost always' slow down (even if only slightly) when someone has committed to overtaking. Doing so maximises everyone's margin.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
stackmonkey
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 15:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
I quite agree, i should actively slow down more in this situation than i actually tend to.

PS in the 'Real problem' thread, could a mod please mis-spell some of the language used, cos my work's pc is now censoring it, whereas previously I could read it? :)
Top
 Profile  
 
Serge
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 15:28 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:35
Posts: 92
Location: Midlands
stackmonkey wrote:
PS in the 'Real problem' thread, could a mod please mis-spell some of the language used, cos my work's pc is now censoring it, whereas previously I could read it? :)


I've just had a look through the "Real Problem" thread and cannot find any inappropriate language whatsoever. Do you think maybe some of Basingwerk's ramblings have been censored?

( :lol: Sorry Basingwerk, I couldn't resist)

_________________
If nothing else works, then a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
SafeSpeed
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 16:16 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Serge wrote:
stackmonkey wrote:
PS in the 'Real problem' thread, could a mod please mis-spell some of the language used, cos my work's pc is now censoring it, whereas previously I could read it? :)


I've just had a look through the "Real Problem" thread and cannot find any inappropriate language whatsoever.


Same here... ?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
stackmonkey
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 17:12 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
it doesn't need to be inappropriate language, nor what anyone would describe as offensive. The censor (WEBsweeper) works by allocating a score to certain words, and if the total and/or proportion exceeds a certain (unknown) value it censors the whole page.

Thus, bad language, any vi0lence, se*ual content, de4th, gets counted in.
I regularly get BBC News, HSE news pages, medical info, and pistonheads all get frequentlyblocked. I've had to stop using 'Yahoo' as a home page as the news content got the page censored.

Edit: forgot to mention; only page 1 is being censored.
Top
 Profile  
 
Gatsobait
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 17:44 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
stackmonkey wrote:
it doesn't need to be inappropriate language, nor what anyone would describe as offensive. The censor (WEBsweeper) works by allocating a score to certain words, and if the total and/or proportion exceeds a certain (unknown) value it censors the whole page.

Thus, bad language, any vi0lence, se*ual content, de4th, gets counted in.
I regularly get BBC News, HSE news pages, medical info, and pistonheads all get frequentlyblocked. I've had to stop using 'Yahoo' as a home page as the news content got the page censored.

Edit: forgot to mention; only page 1 is being censored.

And that doesn't just beautifully illustrate the limitations of automated nannying? :lol:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
basingwerk
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 19:33 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Serge wrote:
Sorry Basingwerk, I couldn't resist


That's quite alright - I know it's working when people get nasty!

_________________
I stole this .sig
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » Discussion Forums » Improving Road Safety

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.050s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]