Safe Speed Forums

Now as we know Lord Ahmed who happens to be a decent chap He was jailed but then released after a week or so.



OK! Mike Rutherford shares my view and the Mad Cats' views on texting and hand held phone using muppets. Nice to know that others share our views and that even Allan Ramsay (Roadpeace member and cyclist) also accepts much of our COAST and educational opinions :lol;

Why? Because he says texting drivers at 60 mph plus are





But then he says that Lord Ahmed did not deserve to be jailed.

Why does he say this?


Well .. cor blimey !





But Rutherford claims that he did not know that texting or picking up a phone whe driving is a prisonable offence.


Umm it is if soemone DIES as a result /


But wait a second .. I tell myself. :Lord Ahmed did not hit the car when texting. His textes were sent minutes before ..

STILL AN OFFENCE - but not directly causing the death of that person all the same/ The person he killed was drunk. had left the car parked in L3. Then walked across the motorway

Now the nub seems to be that if he had not replied to the damned text message - would he have collided with the j-walker some alleged minutes later?

Rutherford asks for the law to be clarified and suggests the law dictates placing phone in glove box. I suggest swtitching off completely on the basis that all phones have voicemuial or message sayin a call has been missed.


I do understand Lord Ahmed's situation. His bad luck in that he collided with the drunken person and had been stupid enough to send to send text meassages minutes before impact.


Moral of this sad tale of tragedy and just maybe a rough justice?

Switch off the phone. You can catch up later. A missed call is not life v death situation nor the end of our worlds as we know it.

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!

Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.

I can't understand why anyone would need or want to send a text message while driving a car. At least with a phonecall you have your eyes fully on the road. So much can happen in the few seconds you'd spend looking at a phone... Okay I'm no angel and like most I've rummaged for sunglasses/glanced at a open atlas/changed a cassette, but these are all done with the merest of glances and all can be considered to greater or lesser degree immediately necessary or desirable. The point of a text message is it's a casual, non-urgent means of communication.

Now I'm unable to multitask to the level required to have a phone conversation and drive safely, although its highly desirable for someone in my position to answer call so I often to used to answer the phone with a brief "hello, how are you, can I call you back in 20 mins?". But people are different and I'm willing to accept there are people out there who can do both safely (abeit many who merely think they can), but the texting is something else... anyone who considers it acceptable has a serious risk-analysis problem.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction

You drive as we do. I tend to have the phone switched off when driving. Passengers are allowed to use them - their OWN!

Driving's a serious business and a skill in its own right. We have an obligation to ourselves to seek to improve these skills just as we do in our professional commitments.


However, Charles did not put the full article and missed out the point Rutherford was making in Auto Express this week.

Rutherford comments that it was Ahmed's fault that he was stupid enough to send the text message minutes before the collision.

But his worry is the precendent it appears to have set given the text was sent MINUTES and not SECONDS before the fatal collision. I admit that I had not thought about it until I read this article



I think that this paragraph as quoted has much to discuss as Rutherford raises some interesting points as regards justice and how this precedent can affect other cases adversely.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !
But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.

Now I understand the blanket 50mph limit proposed. It's to allow Ministers to text safely while driving.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.