dcbwhaley wrote:
Draco wrote:
Scrap the £75 Billion (and rising) commitment to Trident Gordon!
WE are NOT a world power anymore! WE CAN'T afford it!
But Nuclear Weapons are our ticket to the top table in world affairs; the very bedrock of our special relationship with the United States of America. The special relationship that gave us so much assistance in the defence of the Falkland Islands. Without a nuclear deterrent we would be merely a small and insignificant European nation like Germany or France, unable or unwilling to wage war in Iran or Afghanistan.
You might detect a hint of irony there but, seriously, it was your beloved old labour Prime Minister Atlee and Foreign Secretary Bevin who committed us to an "independanT2 nuclear deterrent. To quote the latter in 1946
"We have got to have this thing over here whatever it costs... we have got to have [a] bloody Union Jack on top of it."Thats precisely the problem though, isn't it- we
are a small and relatively insignificant european nation like france or germany, we need to realise that and stop playing at being a world authority. We're the man who used to rich but isn't anymore, but still buys expensive suits and jewellery in the hope he'll be accepted by his rich peers, but in reality has huge debts and might not make the rent.
Don't get me wrong I love the idea of Britain being a powerfull, sucessfull and proud country, and we can be that, but in the words of Harry Callaghan, "A mans got to know his limitations"
Edit: Totally going off topic now, but why do we need £75Billion (or £150+billion with govm. cost overuns) nuclear sub program when nukes can be relatively effectively delivered via £1m-a-pop cruise missiles? I means lets face it, if/when we go nuclear it's endgame anyway, it doesn't really matter if the devastation we inflicted was a little bit less effective than the joneses.