Hmmm.

You say you did an emergency stop in the Opener to this?
Later you say you think you flashed your lights at her? Mind can play tricks as you try to recall what happened.
Squirrel wrote:
toltec wrote:
Given Teabelly's point it would be interesting to hear exactly what Squirrel thought and did when he first saw her and on the approach before she pulled out.
Saw her, lifted (was on a bend so not tanking it) and let engine braking take a bit of speed off whilst covering the brake pedal.
Observed her look left then right then left again.
Saw her front wheels start to turn and began to brake.
Saw her front wheels continue to turn and sounded the horn and flashed the headlights (long flash to say "I am here", not a quick flick to say "pull out").
Saw her continue to pull out regardless and went from gentle braking to hard braking.
Stopped well clear of her. She made eye contact at this point, I instinctively shook my head and put my hands out in a "what the hell was that all about?" gesture.
You said you swore at her at first..

As soon as I see any wheels start to move - I am slowing down to stop as they
just might If you had the time to do a long flash and sound horn - then you could have also been anticipating she just may make the error anyway and continued to ease off there.
Quote:
With hindsight it's possible that the headlamp flash was misinterpreted as as "go ahead" signal rather than "I am here".
Very possible. It may be that the horn and the lights "flummoxed" her as well. I would hope this girl learns something important from this incident
Quote:
I wonder is L plates on the side of a car would be useful?
Most definitely![/quote]
If the person is very young then - they are either a learner or a novice

Some L-cars do have Learner on the side panels with the name of the driving school. We used AA and RAC for our three qualified youngsters and the fosters we also funded in past. They all had L signs on the side of the cars. Second daughter's only 16 - but she will be eligible to learn in Az - so we've already looked ahead for her driving lessons over there
I agree it may be a good idea to stick a further sign on the side doors during the "family practice session"
Quote:
It's worth re-iterating that she wasn't in an instructor's car, looked like her father giving her a lesson so no dual controls, no L-plates on the side/top of the car etc.
You do not know if the parent was also making her "nervous" nor how many ADI lessons she may have had. Remember she would perhaps be getting used to a strange car after the learner vehicle and sometimes "family" is not the best driving instructor.
However, we think we did things the right way for ours. Already posted when our eldest and the first "twin set" learned to drive

We've always booked the lessons in a block of 6 daily and at different times of the day. Sometimes they had two lessons in one day - but our eldest three are lucky to be "summer babies" who had the long summer for learning.
Once they had these 6 lessons behind them - we took them out in our cars. They were learners in the Jags/Moggies/my Stag

and then IG took them out for lessons with him.

After this - they had a further 6 lessons with ADI - then took their driving tests. On passing - we forbade all driving for 24 hours to get the excitement out of systems .. and then continued to supervise for a few days. We chaperoned their first "solos" too

at a healthy stealth. Thus - nothing wrong in parental lessons - but think we have duty of care all the same.
placed in small print as off topic.
Quote:
For Pratnership's benefit this happened at the Round House, she was turning out of the Bradley Green road onto New Road (B4058), I was heading back into Wotton just after the Renishaw bends.
Also for Pratnership's benefit would you stop quoting me out of context to make me look bad. This forum (this section in particular) is for serious discussion. Comments made in jest on other forums or other sections have no place here.
I can understand you on this. We (me and Wildy) put up with a packet on another forum from one rabid nutcase - just for posting common sense values

like COAST! MORE POLICE PLEASE...but also commenting that police are subject to same laws as the rest of us. The rabid nutter twisted it .. and has even been foul- typing us on other boards. By the way . the rabid nutter in question was not a police officer . "lawyer with the police" nor an legal expert in insurance but a known trollster whose posts have been traced to cut/pastes from various sites.
The only reason the person does this is perhaps because he or she or it has no counter-argument - so the only way it sees open to it as regards discrediting the opinion is to attack the poster's reputation. Just to make it clear - I do not think Pratnership is attacking for the sake of it. He or she is probably concerned about you and the number of incidents you have. The person trying to gun us down is doing so for a different reason: it supports speed cameras. We've blown the dogma apart instead of the Gatso :gatso: and delivered the COAST message before the SAC course! As we have perhaps managed to dent the finances as a result - they wish to shoot us in the butt (as we were solemnly informed by an Az police officer on the forum we've not joined over there and who already know all about us

from posts made on here

and on .. err PH

- but also told "Bud you talk sense!"

Pratnership - I am sorry if the way I've worded this has caused offence to you. I am trying to be "understanding" to Squirrel as I would hope to help him learn more and I can also understand your worries as well. I certainly do not want to offend either of you.
Hoping not to offend Pratnership and Squirrel .. but ..
Maybe if you each tried to keep things just a little less personal and when referring to past incidents discussed on other boards - maybe reflecting /evaluating on what can be learned from the various incidents
with a view to their not happening again or diffused/dealt with better if something similar happens .. and be aware that it will never be exactly the same as each incident is unique to own set of circumstance
But in Pratnership's defence - you do seem to be unluckier than most in the number of near misses/or muppets you encounter.
Quote:
Quote:
Road rage is becoming more commonplace in my expirence. Is it the increasing numbers of drivers on the roads, or is it actually increasing anyway?
It's a side effect of the one-horse race that is now road safety. "It's ok because I wasn't breaking the speed limit."
Every incident, every near-miss and almost every frayed nerve is something one can learn from. That's why I post things in here so often. It's called "peer review".
INDEED - we must learn to evaluate each drive and learn from each error. We all make 'em. What seems OK to me .. will affect the other driver. I make sure that I acknowledge each courteous gesture with a smile and a wave (if safe to do so). If they make a mistake - sure I will curse for a second .. mutter "twazak" much to our kids' amusement and deal with the "problem or pereceived problem" they caused as safely as I know how to at the time.
If some one's sticking to the speed limit or driving marginally below it - I have no problems with that. I drive to the road conditions as they present themselves to me. That's what I am told "decently skilled drivers do"

and I try to convey this when observing local IAM candidates on odd occasions.