Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 09, 2026 18:16

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 07:10 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Ziltro wrote:
ed_m wrote:
Ziltro wrote:
Not every bit.
Also why aren't we fighting this?


because that kind of intelligent traffic management is actually quite a good idea ?

No, I mean the spy camera networks paid for by our money used to watch us and log our movements.


well if you're going to be that paranoid about everything and anything we're not going to get very far!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 07:13 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Steve wrote:
ed_m wrote:
because that kind of intelligent traffic management is actually quite a good idea ?

.... until someone breaks down?


well thats rather the point of hard shoulder monitoring .... isn't it ?
you don't want cars running on it if theres a stationary vehicle on it.

something that can easily be detected automoatically through relatively cheap to install video feeds.

already happens on the m42, not sure how automated it is, you pretty much never see a broken down vehicle either on the hard shoulder or in the refuges without a HATO in attendance, how do you think they got there ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:55 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
ed_m wrote:
well thats rather the point of hard shoulder monitoring .... isn't it ?
you don't want cars running on it if theres a stationary vehicle on it.

I have no doubt the monitoring works, but what of the instant when someone breaks down - during that time there is going to be lots of fast traffic in the same lane as one who is stranded. Cue the iffy lane changing and emergency braking.

I guess I'll have to see an actual event to see how it is handled, but until then I remain very sceptical that this is at least as safe as a dedicated breakdown lane.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:13 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Steve wrote:
ed_m wrote:
well thats rather the point of hard shoulder monitoring .... isn't it ?
you don't want cars running on it if theres a stationary vehicle on it.

I have no doubt the monitoring works, but what of the instant when someone breaks down - during that time there is going to be lots of fast traffic in the same lane as one who is stranded. Cue the iffy lane changing and emergency braking.

I guess I'll have to see an actual event to see how it is handled, but until then I remain very sceptical that this is at least as safe as a dedicated breakdown lane.


its actually pretty rare to see a breakdown on the m42 section on the hard shoulder.... most often the vehicle has made it to one of the refuges.

i can understand your concern but ive not seen anything to suggest its any worse than a car breaking down / slowing in L2 or 3 and having to make it to the hard shoulder normally.... or any worse than a line of trucks getting to a slight incline and backing all the traffic up into L3.

so there are the refuges, there's the signage, cameras, in road sensors, there's the typically reduced speed during hard shoulder running anyway, hatos on standby, the fact that most breakdowns will be gradual not dead stops.... quite alot of mitigations.

everyone seems to assume these things haven't been thought about, which i expect to the responsible traffic/highways engineer is quite insulting! that list of mitigations seems to imply it is quite fully thought out.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 17:33 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
ed_m wrote:
Ziltro wrote:
ed_m wrote:
because that kind of intelligent traffic management is actually quite a good idea ?

No, I mean the spy camera networks paid for by our money used to watch us and log our movements.


well if you're going to be that paranoid about everything and anything we're not going to get very far!

I'm not being paranoid, they already are using these spying systems to log our movements and remove our freedom!

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.024s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]