Come in a bit late to this ...
Abercrombie wrote:
4by4 wrote:
You can obviously control this risk by only commiting to an overtake if the road conditions, visibility, and capability of vehicle is appropriate.
Fair enough, but I said at the time that you can't control all risk from other drivers, or the environment. There was some grumbling about that, but eventually they seemed to concede that overtaking has inherent dangers that can't be completely controlled. A residual risk remains.
Humm I am curious - this sounds like you were there - were you ?
Abercrombie wrote:
As I said, there is a residual risk of being "pulled out on", no matter what. The question becomes "is it worth it"?
When overtaking there are a host of 'events' that can happen and managing that risk takes a collection of abilities. Improving those abilities is important to road safety, learning from where is another issue.
Much of this thread has discussed the vehicle that you are overtaking and little has been commented on he car's position, the eye contact with the driver of that vehicle, if wheels are moving, absolute confidence that no assumptions have been accidently taken (of other drivers behaviours), possible problems not considered a factor.
Vision & anticipation are your great friends when overtaking - I think I run through a type of check list, but it is pretty inbuilt now. Anything whatsoever that causes concern prevents the overtake. Once in a blue moon, I am uncomfortable to do an overtake yet everything looks 100% fine, I will never know what stopped me but it happens, but rarely.
I agree that momentum helps to pass another cleanly, and different techniques help too. I agree there is an 'optium' speed to pass safely, but I would never deliberately choose a set speed. There are good overtaking techniques that vary depending on vehicle. Power in this case adds to the safety as it exposes you for less time to the dangers. Power applied at the wrong time however can make things worse so like with everything (just about) care and attention are need to apply one's skill as aptly as appropriate.
I do think an overtaking driving day would help many drivers hone their skills. I would be happy to go off for the day chatting about overtakes and all contributions to Safe Speed are very welcome.

Attention to detail of the vehicle to be overtaken is essential and until one is totally, really, really, sure only then can you make your move.
When you slow behind a possible vehicle you wish to overtake, it gives you valuable time to fully assess the vehicle from the manner it is being driven, vehicle position & changes to this, driver location, (esp id driving seat is occupied), check the vehicle's mirror to see if you can see the driver, the gaps (should always have more than one - unless a clear ahead road), if overtaking several cars knowing all the various cars behaviours is crucial, how they have all been behaving with all other cars, who keeps and doesn't leave gaps, (emergency exit if things go wrong), the vehicles behind you, obvious - indicators, if a driver is moving their head a lot (? checking mirrors prior, to take an action?) etc etc

So time behind a vehicle gives you a lot of crucial info, but one car along a straight that is (TOTALLY)
Clear (includes ALL potential hazards junctions of all natures), you might be able to make all the necessary checks, and go past without the need to be 'right' behind it and follow at a slower speed. I am ready with the horn and lights when overtaking vehicles, with my car both hands can easily remain on the wheel too (and no thumbs through the wheel!)
Being certain about an overtake needs to allow for an abort, after many hours of discussion this seems to be when the front of your car is approximately level with their 'b pillar' (at the end of their blind spot-ish). Note though that the commitment to the overtake is likely to have taken place already but this abort point is after the commitment point.
It is never wrong to abort an overtake if for some reason something changes, perhaps you read something wrong, it is wrong (potentially highly dangerous) to carry on 'anyway' when faced with problems.
I have to say all entrances have to be considered ...
Being ready to honk can be very important for safety.
Johnnytheboy wrote:
What's interesting recalling this is whether I would've done anything different with the benefit of ~18 years experience. The answer is no, I think,
Really !? You have learned nothing that would make your car control and risk management better after 18 years. I cannot believe this. I think maybe you cannot 'see' your improvement, and it isn't obvious to you. However we are all learning more and more, and that attitude alone will be helping you improve. Quiet roads are difficult as delivery vehicles become used to 'no cars', so a little toot of the horn when uncertainty prevails is good.
Another issue on turning off a road - you prepare what vehicles you choose to 'slot into' when appropriate and allow good early action with this, then keep an excellent gap in front of you so that if anyone around you does anything that gives you concern you have space to move into.
As regards the turn off off the A55 the above will apply. The reduction in speed to 20 even as you turn off would be potentially highly dangerous, unless you were in a queue or conditions deem it necessary.
I understand your 'road shock' phrase, as the speed adjustment, when going from e.g. 60 mph roads to 30mph roads. Most road engineering allows for this as much as possible and gives drivers clues about the slower road and slipways to give driver time to readjust. All roads must be driven safety to the prevailing conditions.