Abercrombie wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
But if a driver is not competent to drive at a speed which the majority of motorists would consider to be safe their ability to cope with an emergency must be called into question.
Does anyone here exclusively drive at the very limits of their safety? Safety is just one criteria to choose your speed. Others include comfort, noise, petrol consumption, load, habit, vehicle, passenger concerns, or the view etc. You may even be driving slowly to delay your arrival to the right time. There is only one person who can decide the speed to drive at and that's the person behind the wheel.
Johnnytheboy wrote:
And the driver in front, if you can't pass them.
graball wrote:
And the driver six cars ahead that you've been following for 2 miles at 30MPH on a NSL that's full of double whites and bends.
To the extent that the driver ahead is capable of realizing his/her impact on the freedom of the drivers behind to choose their speed ...
graball wrote:
What annoys me are the people who don't notice you are there, or do, but slow right down on corners and then speed up on the straights, to make life difficult or travel so close to the person in front of them, with no intentions of overtaking but stopping everyone else from doing so.
It's one thing to have a difference of opinion as to what the safe speed may be on any given patch of road.
It's quite another when one masks their own lack of consideration/empathy/driving ability as the right to decide how those behind should drive - which most obviously manifests as denying others behind the right to overtake where reasonably possible.
It's not that hard to say, "excuse me, go on ahead" when you're walking about, and someone tries to get around and past you. If it's that much harder to do the same when driving, and the environment allows it, and the driver in front is the primary reason, then either that driver's motives, abilities, and/or social consideration are rightly called into question.