Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Jun 13, 2026 09:50

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 08:50 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
weepej wrote:
wildcat wrote:
but likened the idea that not giving way to pedestrians or ignoring red lights to "save less than blink of eye in real time" has all the hallmarks of the loathsome London lout in lycra stereotype we are reading more und more of


Wildy, it's not me condoning red light jumping on this thread, it's steve, graball, toltec, johnnytheboy etc...

I don't jump red lights myself, never have, and I always yield for peds on xings, and you won't find me riding on the pavement unless it's a shared path.


:?

Where did I 'condone' red light junmping in this thread?

In one post I asked if it was a question of degree of light-jumpage. You didn't answer that, but picked on my choice of one word to try and twist my point, true to form.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 09:25 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
weepej wrote:
Do you think if you took a 30mph limit urban street and made it NSL and people started doing 50 or 60 down it the number of incidents would go down or up?

That's a tricky one to call.

Of course those involved in a collision would almost certainly perish, however, if the limit was raised to that level then other road users would take so much more care before stepping out into the road, so the number of incidents may actually decrease. Which effect wins? Who knows!
I've seen the other extreme happen in Portsmouth, where people (with families) now just step into a busy 20mph road without looking at all.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:10 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
weepej wrote:
toltec wrote:
What makes a person riding a cycle be allowed to use their judgement when the same person driving a car is not?



They are not allowed to use their judgment, crossing a stop line when the light is on red is illegal, as is going faster than 30mph in a 30mph limit in a motorised vehicle.




That's a bizzare reply: what part of my original statement is not true or indicates a predjudice to a particular mode of transportation?


Those parts? Your bias that cyclists can go faster than the speed limit just because there is no offence of speeding on a push bike.

What makes you think I condone cyclists going through red lights? The only time this is acceptable is if they dismount and walk around the corner on the footpath or if wanting to cross doing so on a green man on foot[*]. When cycling you have the advantage that you can become a pedestrian and use the modes of movement available to a pedestrian if you wish to.

[*]On the subject of being on foot, is it OK for people to cross when the man is red if in their judgement it is clear to do so? I would go for yes, so technically if a cyclist dismounts they can cross a junction on red. :lol:

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:24 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
Steve wrote:
weepej wrote:
Do you think if you took a 30mph limit urban street and made it NSL and people started doing 50 or 60 down it the number of incidents would go down or up?

That's a tricky one to call.

Of course those involved in a collision would almost certainly perish, however, if the limit was raised to that level then other road users would take so much more care before stepping out into the road, so the number of incidents may actually decrease. Which effect wins? Who knows!
I've seen the other extreme happen in Portsmouth, where people (with families) now just step into a busy 20mph road without looking at all.


The other way of looking at it is that that they would hopefully only be doing 50 or 60 when there were no or few pedestrians around and the traffic was light. The problem would come from drivers that have been indoctrinated into believing the speed limit is an indication of the safe speed regardless of conditions.

Edit - another thought :)

If the road was made NSL and it was also made clear that the driver would be facing a careless/dangerous driving conviction if the speed was considered excessive for the conditions or unless the pedestrian could be shown to have been grossly negligent/culpable? Not expressed to the finest detail there, just trying to imply that the duty of care/responsibility would be assumed to lie with the driver in an urban environment.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:44 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
toltec wrote:
[*]On the subject of being on foot, is it OK for people to cross when the man is red if in their judgement it is clear to do so? I would go for yes, so technically if a cyclist dismounts they can cross a junction on red. :lol:


My understanding of the law, and it may be out of date, is that a cyclist is subject to the same regulations whether he his riding, scooting or pushing his machine. He does not become a pedestrian by the act of jumping off his cycle. The legislator's intention being to prevent a cyclist getting off his machine at a restrictive sign or light and scoot or walk past it. The only exception was that it was legal to wheel a bicycle at nigh without lights - to allow him to get home if his lights failed.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 15:12 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
dcbwhaley wrote:
toltec wrote:
[*]On the subject of being on foot, is it OK for people to cross when the man is red if in their judgement it is clear to do so? I would go for yes, so technically if a cyclist dismounts they can cross a junction on red. :lol:


My understanding of the law, and it may be out of date, is that a cyclist is subject to the same regulations whether he his riding, scooting or pushing his machine. He does not become a pedestrian by the act of jumping off his cycle. The legislator's intention being to prevent a cyclist getting off his machine at a restrictive sign or light and scoot or walk past it. The only exception was that it was legal to wheel a bicycle at nigh without lights - to allow him to get home if his lights failed.


So if you get a footbridge that has a no cycling sign you cannot walk across it to save what could be half a mile or more on the road? I get the scooting, though we have all done it if the coast is clear :wink:

I wonder what happens if you carry the bike or have a folding bike for that matter.

Just shows how daft some of the laws are.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 19:02 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
What about a partially-dismantled bike? How dismantled would a bike be before it wasn't a bike any more?

E.g. if you quick released, say, the saddle, could you then walk the bike?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 19:47 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Johnny .. I think you could .. but I have to ask Andreas/Siegli who are lawyers as to any known case law.. or IG who can also access such stuff.

My common sense view is that you could. :wink: But we also know that rules/laws and common sense are not easy bed-fellows :roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.047s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]