Hi Good Driver Sam .. I was going ot eply earlier but saw the Mad Lad had already posted up some stuff which, knowing him in the flesh. he hopes will help. I guess you may see some of his comments as a bit "lad-like" - but he's really "playing" .. trying to make you smile - et at the same time - asking the things which may make you think!

He's a right devious devil in the real world too
Anyway - first of all. Can I congratulate you on salting the road in the winter. And can I reassure you that your salting is not causing the road surface to break. Ice, as you know, swells when solid. A bit like a bocked drain pipe in your kitchen or bathroom

It places pressure on the road around it (or in the case of the drain .. the piping

- and causes a rupture. By salting the road - you are perhaps preventing some further damage as you are probably treating this before the frozen moisture/water has a chance to undermine the road surface. I thus think any wear on the surface will be down to "normal wear and tear" which you can do nothing other than notify your local borough highways department over.

I know from the CTC website that the general response will be "painting a yellow circle around it and no further action taken for months on end"
GoodDriverSam wrote:
Steve – We are not afraid of traffic police. But we are aware that petty drivers who discover our methods may deliberately try to disrupt them, for example, by use of the horn at every blind bend, by using the route more frequently or indeed by speeding at every opportunity. We have had off the record police advice which was wholly sympathetic – apparently parked cars are recognised in high places as having desirable traffic calming properties.
We admit to using the parked up plod car

If the bend is dodgy though .. then as the Mad Lad says - Rule 112 of the Highway Code would permit a light tootle. At night - this does not apply as much as a driver normally sees dipped headlamps to alert him or her. However, the Mad Lad above does raise an important concern over foliage. If you block the view - a court (clever defence lawyer) will pounce on that. My advice wopuld be as the Mad Lad's . to prune things down.
Both me and the Mad Cats (Mad Moggie and Wildy Cat

and the Torkshire based "felines") often holiday in Brittany . We noted a sign around the Rose Granite Coast which showed a kid on a bike . asking drivers to just think about him. This was repeated along the coastal road. We did not note anyone driving at high speeds there. You could as a community collective get planning permission for similar signage. Over there .. I think they did not need it. Over here .. red tape means you do

It's why the person who erected "WPC Hairdrier" had to remove her. She did not have "planning permission"

I admit to finding it odd that I do not need planning permission for a single storey extension .. but would need it to tarmac part of the front lawn (if I so wish .. but I happen to like and enjoy tending a garden :wink) and apparently would need similar to erect a "large straw scarecrow"

which was basically what the WPC in question was

BUT.. We were already auditing the road in question - and the Speed cam wielding scarecrow rather undermined the results. "She" was very lifelike

But we wanted to establish whether or not we needed to deploy the cam van or a "chancer lurk" and this scarecrow seemed to show a "slow for the perceived threat" but no overall increased courtesy/awareness beyond her.

She thus "had to go"

For record - van does its rounds there

now ..
Good Driver Sam wrote:
You write: “people have a habit of conveniently convoluting idiotic, highly dangerous, highly noticeable, and waaaaay too fast joyriders and boy racers, with safe, considerate and relatively inconspicuous commuters”
And why would this be? Maybe it is because the majority of the 28,000+ killed and seriously injured on the roads each year are not the victims of “boy racers” but the victims of those who think they are good drivers and that because they have paid their tax/insurance can drive in whatever way they like. Official figures show that middle aged drivers are the worst… and for the record, I am a middle aged driver.
I keep and repeatedly advise all to never forget COAST

Here? We have a mix. Durham has a good record compared to national average. We have a high DIS offer and Prosecution for Careless rate . and a very low prosecution rate for speeding compared to the national averal

We have one fixed Gatso (somewhere

We move it around

SO it's
not really "fixed"
However... we find middle aged "born again bikers" are our worst stats - followed by serious criminals who use our roads to get from our North to the South..

We also find we have pockets of boy racers who cause mayhem..
The average middle aged and middle classed driver? Most are complacent and thus very dangerous. They refute COAST. They become abusive to folk who remind about COAST too. You only need to look up archives on PH for replies to the Wild Cat and Mad Moggie for such examples.

Those individuals perhaps fit your rather worrying real stereotype. Most posting on this site - thankfully - do not. I have been chattiing to the late Paul Smith on phone and on here since 2004. I chat via posts to all others here. I have never suggested "drive at an illegal speed" and usually alluded to the Highway Code/RTA 1988 and given an insight to good practice via my own training by the way. I have been sympathetic to those who want some advice when copped for whatever though. They are asking for comfort and I give them the truth with a dose of honey when I can

I would be less than a human being if I did not
I do not give false hope .. but I hope I explain the situation without stripping of any dignity. I try to get them to learn COAST values from their mistakes. I hope I make the roads a bit safer by doing so. To me .. little point in "rubbing a nose into a mess", It achieves . what exactly? I've adopted the same attitude when faced with folk I've arrested who have actually attacked me with intent to do harm to me. Keep calm and never let yourself be fazed - never ever stoop to their level - that's the professionalism required.
good drver sam wrote:
Our village does not have any problems with the kind of drivers you describe who are thankfully rare – our problems are with “otherwise law-abiding” drivers who pick and choose what laws they obey. I would add that whilst walking in our village we would prefer to be passed by illegal unlicensed / uninsured / untaxed drivers within the speed limit than by fully legal drivers who speed.
Our real experience is that the illegal unlicenced has zero regard for any law
Who is doing the speeding here? We find it's usually locals in situations such as you describe. The Swiss have Kantonal referenda to resolve. Germans have local initiatives which put pressue on local councils to take action. Maybe the UK has to develop similar? Just to get the issues addressed by police and council? For record sam.. complain to us .. we audit it thoroughly and take action as required
good driver sam wrote:
re: cameras – What could be fairer than speed limits having to be signed by law and repeated on roads where there are no street lights in 30mph areas or street lights in NSL areas or at any other speed? What could be fairer than cameras being signed and painted bright yellow? What could be fairer than having a 10% + 2mph leeway, particularly when speedometers tend to over read? I believe that speeding is unique in that it is the only criminal offence where you can get away with a fixed penalty without going to court. Talk about being soft on speeders. Anyway cameras clearly detect offences and save the police having to do it themselves therefore freeing up their time for other work. Personally we look forward the fast approaching day when all roads are covered by average speed cameras.
Bad driving is bad driving and speed ain't the real problem. You can be dangerous and slow. We have examples of kids being killed in driveways.. pulling out in front of another vehicle.. One woman was jailed for performing a U-turn with scant regard for the biker she killed by pulling out in front of him from a lay-by at low speed.

DO an FOI on us. You find we have a high and successful prosecition and ban outcome rate for careless-dangerous. High DIS offers too. Lower than average porsecutions for speeding and record as constant the safest roads in UK - KSI stat-wise
You find we do not do fixed /SPEC cams .. but do do a van and have all cars in fleet equipped with all the toys available. As Garvin famously remarked in one of his many press interviews
Quote:
.idiots have the cunnung of the devil. They manipulate. They cannot manipulate our RPU
good driversam wrote:
If speed limits are not, IN YOUR OPINION, set appropriately then you should take the advice that has been given to me and go through the proper channels in order to seek change rather than flout the law. Anyone genuinely concerned about the safety of the roads welcomes both traffic police and cameras. The bottom line is that if cameras were got rid of there would be no more police around than there are now – but a lot more speeders.
We have a full RPU and officers applying for available places. We and N Yorks have RPU still at 1980 levels. We know others have culled their units.

Oh y the way ,, we combined RPU with horses/dog and Armed Response Units. .. Err.. it means we have nasty dogs .. nice horses.. and .. umm ... guns

If as Swindon . you remove the fixed cam . you move to more cam van/RPU backing. Ummm .. more plod. As said .. we never went down that route .. but we have a reputation of "Hardline"

and tougher than most

Do not ever speed here.

by the way. You will find we do as I post
But sam .. please get ward councillors to back you. Write to local RPU .. address to Chief Inspector. If no joy .. send copy to CC. Write to local press. Kick up stink of the smelliest you can here.
If you have VAS and it's being ignored... point this out. Identify the type who ignore those signs. Get police to do this for you.

Quote:
Re: “it (Safe Speed) also encourages limits to be set appropriately, as well as enforced fairly. It does not encourage anyone to act illegally.”
By stealth that’s exactly what this site does and the deeper I delve into it the more I realise this. One example is a posting from the late Mr Smith in which he boasts about travelling in a car at 90mph in a 30mph limit. Just what kind of message do you think this sends out? Boy racers do not set out to kill and believe that they do no harm – just like the “inconspicuous commuters” you refer to and the majority of drivers who frequent this site.
I refer to defences put by so-called plod on PH re Milton. PAH! For record .. no one here .. does such daftness.
good driver sam wrote:
When it became clear that VAS were useless, we did indeed contact the LA. Only after years of getting nowhere did we start to take our own action. Wildcat, note - they are properly placed.
Then why is no one taking any darned notice of them?

For record// the Mad Cats do not actually speed. They are controlled and disciplined .. but can still "let rip in Germany and on track"

I know.. I spent a day with Wildy in her car after she got the nod from her medics.

Note ./. the girl refused to drive until judged fit to do so after a very nasty childbirth experience which "knocked her out" I took her out on track. She was on form. She wants me to assess her on public roads again before she hits the road to Staveley

Her logic? She hit the rock bottom healthwise after giving birht to twin in her forties. She was quite ill in reality. Her medics told her not to drive. She followed their advice to the letter. That lady.. inisisted on driving lessons again after this enforced break. I think this shows up her calibre and character

I am not saying this as a kinsman to her. She's unique and a model to follow in my objective opinion here.
good driver sam wrote:
Anyway thank you Steve – you illustrate perfectly what we are up against. Drivers that they think everyone is at fault but themselves who refuse to believe that their own behaviour is dangerous. In these days of frustration about laws being unenforced and people literally getting away with murder you can be sure that our methods will be repeated. There is a reason why no one in power anywhere has ever taken any notice of this so-called safe speed campaign, it is no surprise that it appears to be on its knees? Meanwhile, we have solved the problem of lawbreaking in our village and will continue with our methods as long as it takes.
Please prune your foliage. It adds to your problem.
good driverr sam wrote:
Finally, in response to your question: “What do your horse riders think of you sending them out amongst greatly frustrated “manics” on “blind bends”?
They have no idea what is going on. The official reason club riding times were changed from 3:00pm to 4:30pm was to acommodate for younger members after school. Anyhow, due entirely to our action traffic density at 4:30 is now similar to what it is at 3:00.
Riding schools around here have flashng led lighs on their hi-viz jackets.
good drver sam wrote:
And to dear old graball…
As is normally the case, I have no idea what you are talking about. But your posts always amuse me… ha ha ha ha…. I wonder how many speeding tickets you have had…. ha ha ha ha…. And thanks for the lesson in salt!
And to Widlcat...
Thak you for your well intentioned advice. I can assure you that we did go through the local council for a solution and they didn't seen to care. The only reason we have been taking this action is because we really were at our wits end. We simply could not tollerate the danger and unpleasantness any longer. But the bottom line is our actions have worked. Of course if the council asked for shrubbery to be removed we would do so, but the overgrown shrubbery actually compliments the rural nature of the roads - so far no one has been asked to remove anything.
It may not be "established" yet then, Please keep the foliage to acceptable levels then and ignore my earlier comment

Do not give up on council .. You need to keep on petitioning and as the mad lad suggested KNOCK ON DOORS there.
My advice ls like the mad doc and his wild wife .. well intentioned and hoping to help? We are NOT condoning stupid fools. - but simply thinking of how you may resolve your problem here. And ..yep .. we do see your problem. We accept it may not be as simple as we are reading it. But do expand. I would hate to think you think no one cares here. We do. Can you state problem without attacking the late Paul Smith and upsetting his widow? Paul and me? We agreed on some things.. agreed to disagree as pals on other "sundries" of varying significances .. and retained full respect as a result.
I support Claire as a pal and hope I soothe her grief. Sam . Your posts will hurt a woman who feels a very deep sense of loss of a loved one. The late Paul Smith made good points. There were a few things we plods could contest.. but overall.. he made valid points which merit respect. Now does that sound fair to you. The late Paul conceded the value of VOAST by the way

His widow embraces its value. Me? I simply say how we mark DIS and SAC .. and I stand by that mark sheet 100%.
COAST [i[works[/i] You say you still have problems. That means you have to seriously go back to counci;/police and work out why. There must be some thing ..take a close llook at how your roads are engineered. Ask HARD questions in all lobbies to council.
AUDIT well. Keep logs.. records. photos. video evidence. But go through official channels .. and if this fails .. HIT local press and national tabloids.
\not .. I ma not without sympathey .. but you must get LA to see the problems here., SO make waves to locally elected ward councillors and local MP . Let us know how things progress for you here.
Yes .. despite the banter . tongue in cheek..to make you think of the devil's gremlin on shoulder

- I know and understand you. But please do growl more at local council and police. Keep up the pressure. By doing so . you perhaps achieve? I hope I am bing fair to all in this post.
Quote:
And finally, re turning into drives/reversing. You have given us a fantastic idea of advising all in our campaign to reverse into their drives from now on whenever there is a following car. Thanks - this should cause some hold ups!
I would hope a following car would be keeping a normal 2 second response gap and able to stop safely on own side fo road in distance seen to be clear... which means they would not be speeding if that be the case

But use COAST .. communicate with the other road users

\by doing so . you communicate .. make it safer for you and them idiots too.

Two wrongs do not make things right. Please keep this in mind in your campaign . which I understand . but stress to keep it all legal and make sure no person/insurer can wag fingers.