Peyote in reply to Johnny wrote:
Jumping into your debate briefly, I would suggest this would depend on what you're hoping to achieve. Bicycles have the advantage of taking up less road space than other road users (well, a normal diamond framed one anyway!) including four people in one car, though full double decker buses would probably be a better option. So if the objective is to reduce congestion, then they have one major advantage in that respect.
If two or more riders are abreast of each other - then they take up quite a fair bit of road space.

I think you would notice a significant amount of "jostling" just as you do on London/Manchester pavements in peak hours.. or when gettting to your seats in a stadium if all of us decided to ride tomorrow.
I also speak from the experience of the recent bike ride with the family. (Yep .. I came last but I preferred to pace behind 'em (well - that's my excuse anyway

) But you had to give each other sufficient room even on the bike - so just because they are narrower does not mean any less congestion of a huge number are using the same road space at the same time. Also .all would have different levels of stamina and ability .. so speed differentials would be very different and would eventually demand a cycling licence under Health $ Safety

I tend to look at the hard facts of life and the practicalities if thousands ride to work each day.
Peyote wrote:
If you take into account environmental factors, both locally and globally (if you believe the IPPC on the latter) then again bicycles have a major advantage over other vehicles.
Errr.... sweat and farting add .... we admit we did plenty of each during that bike ride
But more seriously - bicycles still have to be manufactured and most are imported these days .. so they are not exactly 100% eco-friendly
Peyote wrote:
If you're looking at health factors, and accept that car-use encourages a sedentary lifestyle, again bicycles are the better option.
Not everyone wants exercise. Now I happen to know that because of what I do for a living

You can advise .. but you cannot force folk to do or follow advice.

There are also as Steve points out . the elderly.. the disabled. Perhaps you would like to explain to my nephew how he may ride a bicycle given he lost his legs as a toddler .. complications from meningitis
What we are saying is that one size does not fit all and that whilst bicycles may be OK/ideal for some (not all ) folk for short commutes to work and back/small treks for the newspaper and the odd loaf at ye olde corner shoppe .. but for the practicalities and varied needs of all our lifestyles - a bicycle cannot be the "better option" overall.
peyote wrote:
Thinking about it, the only advantages a car has over a bicycle is comfort and speed (at a particular time of day, time of year and journey start and finish locations). What impact this has on "deserving priority" is an interesting question...
If you seriously think about what I have said above - a car has many more advantages over a bicycle. We would not have a hope in hell of feeding our huge family without our cars. As you may be aware - my wife was taken quite worryng ill after giving birth to our twins.. and required regular hospital treatment for the last 6 months. She's only recently been passed fit again and the reason why she was advised not to drive was because of the general weakness following pernicious anaemia and some other complications which resulted from what was a hard pregnancy to go through this time. But anyway .. I certainly missed her contribution to the realities of rural family life here .
OK so I have a Jaguar estate. Wildy being Wildy prefers a sportier version

We own a people carrier and use that and the estate car for the collective family trips. A family of 14 persons on bicycles including babies in a trailer take up space and believe me.. wayyyy tooo much onus of supervision in keeping us together and safe. I'd suggest you try it

to find out/experience for yourselves what I am talking about If I was cutting down a one way street as the leader of the family on bikes ..with Wildy supervising the rear of the "sort of family cycle bus" - I'd be placing us and others in some danger here. We'd be just like a 4x4 in bicycle volume. Likewise if we were in the people carrier

I would expect to negotiate with the other road users and apply courteous give and take .. but perhaps I'd choose to ride within the one way in the first place given the logistics of supervising that many youngsters

I only indulge in this when we are holidays as way too tiring to do each day
What I am trying to say and give an extended example of our family situation is that bicycles are great for singletons/dinky/2.4 kid lifestyles but not practical for folk like us who have been a prolific in the bedroom

but who love having our kids anyway and I'd not wish to alter one thing about my family life. I adore my family.
Sorry if I am warbelling. I leave the UK tomorrow for a big adventure. and it's an odd feeling.