Steve wrote:
ItsEssexRob wrote:
There were lots of seats of them but it didnt seem like an even number. do they take it from the first til the last? or from each set?
I believe SPECS now has approval to enforce between all consecutive cameras, meaning a continuous strip of enforced mini-zones - the "worst case" (depending on point of view).
Dunno the typical distance between them.
In our experience ... und I used to drive quite often to HQ ( a mere 270 plus mile or so) from Cumbria

und both Ted und selbst used to commute many miles until our move to Tucson (und now we get much more family time as commutes are much shorter for us

und the drive ist rather interesting .. as it on a long FAST straight

which our Mercs over there quite enjoy.. despite the shockingly low speed limit

}
Anyway ..after digressing ..

....

in our experience ...
We have travelled on umpteen road with SPECS .. the last one being the M62 the other day as ranted

over...und
[i]There ist not fixed distance between them. They all vary with some having just one at start of roadworks with its partner camera placed near end of the long roadworks .. example reported by Ted's sister Julia was the M56 before the exit to North Wales (M53/A55????) way back in 2005 with three-four similar set -ups seen by us on the M6/M5/M1 respectively over journeys taken between 2004-2009.
Do not be fooled into thinking these just work in pairs... they check the average speed along the entire route... from SPEC ONE to TWO to THREE etc to the FINAL ONE. They do not measure between each one.. they will measure average speed between each pairing und along the ENTIRITY of however many there are... Our tame magistrates have been on Bench for disputes of this nature und the persons sadly lost on the points of law as applied.
I thus make the point that with SPECS in particular - folk out there have to be very careful und apply COAST literally with foot well und truly gently on the "loud pedal".
It ist of course pefectly possible to keep a steady gentle in the flow. As far as we are aware - they have always measured the entire length - especially those with the ODD number of cameras along the section.
What we found particulary frustrating on the M62 were the "Camera Not In Use" signs which were obliterated by other road furniture und everyone slamming on the anchors when they saw them

which suggest that folk still do not understand how these cams work und thus make life more dangerous for all out there

Steve wrote:
ItsEssexRob wrote:
Also yes it was my dashboard. My gps read 51 - is it normal for the speedo to be up to 10% out? I thought maybe the sat nav was wrong.
What you see is quite normal.
Sat Navs are usually quite accurate (when maintaining a constant speed, on a straight roads without an incline). Speedos are rarely accurate and almost always over-read, by up to 10%+6.25mph (a lot).
51 on the GPS in a 50 limit is absolutely fine as far as any cameras are concerned (although you are still technically breaking the law). Those drivers passing you likely know this already.
The SatNav speedo und the RA/Pogo/origin etc speedos are all a lot more accurate than the speedo in your car .. und this also include the so-called "calibrated speedo" in a plodmobile as these would still be around 3 mph adrift by comparison to the GPS version. (We have been busy testing on track over the years with a variety of our family's collection of toys

und we find a modern car (on NORMAL TYRES - NOT TRACK ONES) with a computer on board which control the speedo on the dash will be out by 3 mph against the GPS one across the range. We did find that WINTER tyres did affect the in-car speedo reading further by about 1-2 mph
We did not do these tests "under lab conditions" as such as we had not officially recorded this in front of an independent third party.. but mocked up as if in lab with "control measures" und so was.

Besides it was our fun time .. we are wearing "anoraks"

...
But at 51 mph ....you would not be likely to be done for this under the so-called "tolerance" system..
