SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
There maybe 'something' in it and it maybe that no one has shown 'how' and 'why' it works when it does.
I've taken the time to try and understand what Derren Brown does, absolutely fascinating stuff. From that I was unpleasantly surprised to learn just how suggestible many folk are. I've also read up on the processes of human bias (confirmation bias, congeniality, congnitive dissonance, etc).
All considered, I reckon it is far more likely this detector (or any form of dowsing) has 'worked' because of suggestion (from others or one's self) and the desire to believe (and the desire for rewards no doubt).
A device that can locate something passive, non-conductive and contained, through any material, at up to thousands of meters away, without contact of any kind (vapour, contamination or otherwise), by using a means of totally passive "electrostatics" - is beyond physical comprehension. Yet:
Iraqi Interior ministry still backing 'bomb detector'Apparently, it's all down to the user

Returning and adding to my underlying point:
A British business group, which has made countless millions from governments by selling safety devices for use by their various agencies, is under scrutiny for blatant and wilful misrepresentation of the effectiveness of these units. These units cost tens of thousands each. The authorities using the devices continue to stand by these devices even though the basic and obvious flaws raised by those questioning the effectiveness remain unacknowledged and unaddressed.
What makes it far worse is that reliance on these methods has resulted with many needless deaths, at least hundreds more than using traditional effective measures.
I guess people can fall for the most ridiculous of claims if spun hard enough by so-called 'experts'.And how is this related to the aims of this campaign?
