Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jul 14, 2026 13:34

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 22:47 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Here
Quote:
Call to bring back speed cameras in Swindon
Swindon Advertiser
8:30am Wednesday 17th February 2010
THE DECISION to switch off Swindon’s speed cameras has come under freshattack after the devices were linked to a dramatic fall in serious traffic collisions elsewhere.
Records from camera sites in Northern Ireland revealed that fatalities or serious injuries have halved since their introduction in the province.
South Swindon MP Anne Snelgrove said the findings strengthened calls by her and others for Swindon Council to turn cameras here back on.
The Northern Ireland safety camera scheme began in 2003 with four fixed camera sites, 31 mobile camera sites and 33 mobile camera routes.
Data collected over the three years before the launch and compared with the three years afterwards showed the number of serious collisions at camera sites fell from 169 in 2002/3 to 76 last year. The fall in areas not covered by cameras was significantly less.
Norther Ireland environment minister Edwin Poots said: “These are significant reductions and a clear demonstration that safety cameras, both fixed and mobile, reduce fatal or serious injury collisions.”
It followed the publication of a separate survey last month, by moneysupermarket.com, that suggested more than half of men with speeding convictions in parts of Swindon were aged 31 to 40 – one of the highest concentrations in that age group in the country.
Swindon Council turned off the five fixed cameras in the town last July following complaints that they were unfairly punishing motorists.
Peter Greenhalgh, cabinet member for transport on Swindon Council, said: “Speed cameras are just one of many measures that can be used to reduce accidents, and the police are still using mobile cameras here.
“The issue for us was the cost of the three fixed camera sites in Swindon and their overall effectiveness in reducing deaths and injuries, especially when we looked at the findings of an independent analysis of our accidents which showed that different measures were needed.
“We have now freed that money up to spend on other more targeted road safety measures right across the borough.”
But Ms Snelgrove said: “The council should reconsider. It was completely disgraceful they stopped using speed cameras in the first place.
“Swindon is one of the top towns in the country for speeding and there is now increasing evidence that speed cameras do make people consider their speed, not just because of the possibility of fines but because it reminds them of the speed limits in the town, which are there for everyone’s safety.
“My biggest concern is for safety, not about the amount of money these cameras raise.”

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 00:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Quote:
Records from camera sites in Northern Ireland revealed that fatalities or serious injuries have halved since their introduction in the province.

Swindon must be very close by to Northern Ireland, right? :roll:
I mean, why cherry-pick some sites in Northern Ireland (!) instead of the rather more sensible 'average of the UK'? I think we know the answer to that! :roll:

Quote:
Data collected over the three years before the launch and compared with the three years afterwards showed the number of serious collisions at camera sites fell from 169 in 2002/3 to 76 last year. The fall in areas not covered by cameras was significantly less.

Another case of RTTM, the placing of cameras where the KSI rate is expected to significantly fall anyway, even without any treatment :roll:
I've not even started with 'bias on selection'!

What do we have do to stop these people from continuing to get away with it?

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 01:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
You cannot do anything.
People are sheep. They follow their leaders, especially newspaper leaders.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.034s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]