Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jul 14, 2026 00:47

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Gordon Brown speeding
PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 21:04 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
did anyone else see this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... rsery.html

It was on the telly yesterday. Don't do as I do and all that lot :x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 00:39 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
It's OK, he was in a Toyota, with a stuck accelerator!! :lol:

There's an exemption for that.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 16:04 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 16:07
Posts: 3
Pity it wasn't an exploding car, we would have got rid of the * :censored: * then


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 22:31 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
acid drop wrote:
Pity it wasn't an exploding car, we would have got rid of the :censored: then



Oy- the Brown that uses that title is (IMHO) a very funny man ( some might say a bit crude ,but that's Teeside humour) :D :D :D

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 23:36 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
I can fully appreciate and understand the need for MrB to try and arrive on time, but like all of us when we are running behind we have to simply cope with the rules of the Land as requested by MrB for the good of us all.

No matter how expert all the escorting officers (drivers/riders) are, considering how much 'arm waving' was necessary shows just how little attention road users were paying, and just how very dangerous SPECS systems effect all road users.
SPECS have nothing to do with road safety, they tire road users into a zombie-like state becoming clearly evident when they tailgate, bunch up, show little attention to the road conditions and surrounding activities, however the distraction caused to ensure speed compliance, with regular & frequent requirement to check speed and cameras to remain legal adds to the unsafe environment created.

For the PM to consider this hypocritical manoeuvre is just disgusting and IMO shows the potential contempt and dis-respect that he must have for the public.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 09:13 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Surely on of the tenants of these forums is that the individual driver should be allowed to make her own decision about the safe speed for the circumstances. If these police trained drivers, who are not - in an emergency - required to obey speed limits, judged that 60mph was safe then where is the problem?

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:27 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
dcbwhaley wrote:
Surely on of the tenants of these forums is that the individual driver should be allowed to make her own decision about the safe speed for the circumstances. If these police trained drivers, who are not - in an emergency - required to obey speed limits, judged that 60mph was safe then where is the problem?

Was this an emergency?

And surely the point is that people in positions of authority should set an example when they demand absolute compliance with speed limits from ordinary folks.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:43 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
dcbwhaley wrote:
Surely on of the tenants of these forums is that the individual driver should be allowed to make her own decision about the safe speed for the circumstances. If these police trained drivers, who are not - in an emergency - required to obey speed limits, judged that 60mph was safe then where is the problem?



I could not agree more, however the individuals in this case would have been fined for doing this and the bloke who makes the rules does has he pleases.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 12:39 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
dcbwhaley wrote:
If these police trained drivers, who are not - in an emergency - required to obey speed limits, judged that 60mph was safe then where is the problem?
The hypocrisy! ;)

Either it's :50: "for a reason" or it isn't :50: "for a reason"?

They were speeding and we're constantly told that speed kills. Weepej holds this view as an immutable fact, as I understand?

The logical conclusion, therefore, is they were prepared to kill people.

Correct Weepej? :)

BTW. Speeding and riding with one arm on the handlebars :shock: Tut tut :nono:

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 13:03 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
dcbwhaley wrote:
Surely on of the tenants of these forums is that the individual driver should be allowed to make her own decision about the safe speed for the circumstances.

This is my opinion (note my sig):

You are correct, but as SafeSpeedV2 said: "we have to simply cope with the rules of the Land", which is reasonable, but is the usage of those rules reasonable?

There wasn't an emergency, so "If it was deemed safe, would it then be safe for everyone to drive through at 60 mph and why is there a 50 mph limit?" which I think is a bloody good question.

This action was needless (no emergency), so they either posed a needless risk by travelling at 60 (abuse of position), or there was no risk (abuse of limit setting).

Today's limits, being set at the lowest common denominator, robs drivers of the ability to judge the safe speed for the circumstances.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 18:51 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
PeterE wrote:
Was this an emergency?


Of course. A politician was late for an appointment. What greater emergency can you envisage?

Quote:
And surely the point is that people in positions of authority should set an example when they demand absolute compliance with speed limits from ordinary folks.

Has Gordon Brown actually made a public statement demanding absolute compliance with speed limits? Do you condemn him for taking the advice of the traffic police?

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 22:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
dcbwhaley wrote:
Has Gordon Brown actually made a public statement demanding absolute compliance with speed limits? Do you condemn him for taking the advice of the traffic police?


Not implying or comparing our BIB to certain animals in Animal Farm ( would suggest that those with noses in ( the expenses row)trough fit the bill ) --it looks like a case of "Some animals are more equal than others" :D

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:28 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
botach wrote:
..it looks like a case of "Some animals are more equal than others" :D
:lol:

I think they are a bunch of Cheatahs myself. :D

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 21:13 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Big Tone wrote:
botach wrote:
..it looks like a case of "Some animals are more equal than others" :D
:lol:

I think they are a bunch of Cheatahs myself. :D


:D :D :D

But unlike their animal counterparts they change their spots to suit the occasion .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 03:14 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
dcbwhaley wrote:
PeterE wrote:
Was this an emergency?
Of course. A politician was late for an appointment. What greater emergency can you envisage?

Really - getting to a school PR is an emergency - I have to disagree. The school for young children can easily wait.
dcbwhaley wrote:
PeterE wrote:
And surely the point is that people in positions of authority should set an example when they demand absolute compliance with speed limits from ordinary folks.

Has Gordon Brown actually made a public statement demanding absolute compliance with speed limits? Do you condemn him for taking the advice of the traffic police?
Peter is right we have to know that those in authority use their powers proportionately and this was not one of those occasions, so it was abused. He chose to do something deliberately when everyone else is unable to.
The fact that the Police bikers had to wave their arms to enable people to move over tends to imply that it was not 100% safe, due to inattention because of the SPECS.
The highway Code exists so that all road users know what they should, and should not do and compliance with the speed limit is one.
When speed limits are set below the expected or necessary rate they become widely questioned as is happening. This highlights this issue perfectly.
Edited.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Gordon Brown
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 23:07 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
dcbwhaley wrote:
PeterE wrote:
Was this an emergency?
Of course. A politician was late for an appointment. What greater emergency can you envisage?
Really - getting to a school PR is an emergency - I have to disagree. The school for young children can easily wait.
dcbwhaley wrote:
PeterE wrote:
And surely the point is that people in positions of authority should set an example when they demand absolute compliance with speed limits from ordinary folks.
Has Gordon Brown actually made a public statement demanding absolute compliance with speed limits? Do you condemn him for taking the advice of the traffic police?
Peter is right we have to know that those in authority use their powers proportionately and this was not one of those occasions, so it was abused. He chose to do something deliberately when everyone else is unable to.
The fact that the Police bikers had to wave their arms to enable people to move over tends to imply that it was not 100% safe.
The highway Code exists so that all road users know what they should and should not do and compliance with the speed limit is desired.
Whilst speed limits are being set at ever slowing rates, this is becoming a bigger issue as it is now more widely questioned than ever before ... however ...
There is little doubt in my mind that the convoy drivers had additional training specifically to that task, and were acting as something of a hive mind under the guidance of a trained convoy supervisor. I'd only be surprised if the speed of the convoy had been selected by G. Brown himself, instead of the convoy supervisor. This - an educated guess - is because G. Brown either cannot drive, or hasn't driven in so long, that the former assertion may as well be true.
Either way, an entire convoy of vehicles driving at a speed above the posted speed 'limit' just because some guy was late for an appointment - as opposed to, say, the commission of a crime in progress, or the prevention of same - is prima facie evidence that the posted speed 'limit' has been set too low (not to mention G. Brown's hubris).

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.055s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]