Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun May 31, 2026 00:40

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 02:15 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
jomukuk wrote:
curves

But I find things like:
Image
"Spectrum of a Xenon gas discharging lamp"


This explains all:
Link wrote:
Image
Figure 2. (above) Spectra of a xenon flash lamp:
1- at a high current density of 6.500 kA/cm2,
2- at a low current density of approx. 1000 kA/cm2.


The spectra varies with power.
So yes they can have an IR skewed sprectrum, if they're used gently.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 15:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Why should they be used "gently" ?
The units [new devices near gatso] are obviously to do with some function of the unit. Since the units that I know of already HAVE a flash attachment AND the additional attachment it is dubious that they are flash units. Given that they have all-too-obvious diffusers on them.
Since the users have no personal financial reason to minimise power to save money...using the unit for anpr would not need a flash anyway, and a constantly-on unit would be much more use....indeed, there would be no use for it/them to be xenon, except that using xenon lamps would mean less waste/unwanted heat.
My ordinary mobile-phone-camera photographs (underexposed) using the built-in xenon flash via a wratten 87c filter...so there must be a measurable IR output....and a camera-phone flash is not exceptionally intense.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 23:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
jomukuk wrote:
My ordinary mobile-phone-camera photographs (underexposed) using the built-in xenon flash via a wratten 87c filter...so there must be a measurable IR output....and a camera-phone flash is not exceptionally intense.


And has anyone else tried monitoring the outpit from these addiditions with a IR sensitive device - my mobile on video mode coildn't see any IR- though ot could see the oitput from a TV remote - but it might not be sensitive enough .

( add - apologies fro spelling -think it's time i invested in new keyb - some letters are now a bit dodgy :shock: ) .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 01:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
I spent an hour observing one with an image intensifier. Nothing. Not even any flashes from the truvelo.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 07:24 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
jomukuk wrote:
Why should they be used "gently" ?

To achieve the IR spectrum you gave.

jomukuk wrote:
The units [new devices near gatso] are obviously to do with some function of the unit. Since the units that I know of already HAVE a flash attachment AND the additional attachment it is dubious that they are flash units.

They surely must be flash units if they have a flash attachment. Of course they'll likely do more than flash (i.e. the "amber alert").

jomukuk wrote:
Given that they have all-too-obvious diffusers on them.

What could be significant about this?

jomukuk wrote:
Since the users have no personal financial reason to minimise power to save money...using the unit for anpr would not need a flash anyway, and a constantly-on unit would be much more use

Yes, an ANPR device doesn't need a powerful flash; IR LED arrays, or a bulb and filter, suffice (SPECS). I suspect using Xenon for constant ANPR would be a waste (I don't know what their lifetime would be when constantly used).

jomukuk wrote:
My ordinary mobile-phone-camera photographs (underexposed) using the built-in xenon flash via a wratten 87c filter...so there must be a measurable IR output....and a camera-phone flash is not exceptionally intense.

I don't doubt that, but could it illuminate a vehicle +50m away? (even without the IR rejection filter and with the same optical 'speed' (f ratio) as a gatso camera)
Remember, VRM recognition isn't the important characteristic for the 2nd photo.


I should point out that all of this is based on speculation; we don’t know if this new cam works with only IR.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 09:32 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Steve, my apologies, my comments on IR reception were based on my own experiences with devices utilising MCPs, not CCDs, so are largely irrelevant to this discussion. Feel free to disregard!

_________________
Regulation without education merely creates more criminals.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 09:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
The cameras are not new, in many cases the cameras are the same and the extra unit is added-on.
I could spend hours watching one unit, but it would not help to decide what their function is other than speed detection, and it would be very risky anyway...don't forget that taking photographs of anything is now seen [by the police] as a criminal offence...let alone sitting watching a speed camera unit...
In any case..who cares ?
What difference is it going to make to anything ?
The time to halt the roll-out of anything has long gone, and the facts are that what we have now in terms of speed-detection and information gathering and storage is only going to become more advanced. The next stage of the vehicle itself gathering the information speed/distance/location/destination and reporting it directly is now becoming the focus of interest.
The use of gps for insurance purposes proved the functions can be used, and the next step/s will not be long in appearing.
Road pricing has not gone away, just moved-along under the radar (as it were).
First dedicated anpr units, then the use of existing cctv to gather the information.
The processing of data from video is a growth industry....and even the manufacturers of the system are proud of the fact that the advanced specs systems are capable of following individual vehicles from point to point, and store that information.
what hope ?

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 14:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 10:47
Posts: 59
Since I initiated this topic, I think I should be the one to solve it. I have submitted a FOI request to the Home Office asking a list of questions about this device. I intend to make 'em work hard and provide me with the info. When I get the answers I will post them on here. If everyone did this it would make the authorities think twice about putting up mysterious equipment without going public about what it's for.

Incidentally, the other day in Greater Manchester I saw a police Traffic car with the letters ANPR on the front passenger door. I have never noticed this before. Could this device be transmitting info to these patrol cars direct?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 15:36 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
In Salisbury, I have seen an unmarked police car equipped with ANPR stationed at the side of a road. Further down the road was a group of police motorcyclists and patrol cars who were stoppping people identified as suspect in some way.

No fixed devices need be involved.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 20:47 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
malcolmw wrote:
In Salisbury, I have seen an unmarked police car equipped with ANPR stationed at the side of a road. Further down the road was a group of police motorcyclists and patrol cars who were stoppping people identified as suspect in some way.

No fixed devices need be involved.


Seen devices fitted to roofs of local police vehicles, for some time and tried to ID them .Since looking for any ID on these additions to Gatso's on net ,have discovered that these units are the same as used on DVLA vans -ie -ANPR units .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 04:56 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
I have made FOI requests on these - hope to hear back soon ... :)

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 19:11 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
As to the amount of resource tied into anpr.
The local law had an anpr purge near a motorway junction. Every way off that junction had anpr units stationed on it....all the data was carried through a small truck parked on a hilltop (a picnic site....so plenty of people noted it) which had a satellite antenna mounted on the roof. And no, it was not a camper, it had police inside it. When you consider the amount of police vehicles involved....each anpr vehicle had others attending it...I noted a dozen cars, vans and motorcycles...and that was just on one route with a few side roads....there are 4 other roads off that junction...
To be fair about it, they are not targeting lawful drivers...indeed, they cannot.
They also work with VOSA, DVLA, The Benefits Agency and HMRC.
So: if you're running-on-red....or working-and-claiming.....or working as a courier on ordinary insurance.....

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 00:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
jomukuk wrote:
As to the amount of resource tied into anpr.
The local law had an anpr purge near a motorway junction. Every way off that junction had anpr units stationed on it....all the data was carried through a small truck parked on a hilltop (a picnic site....so plenty of people noted it) which had a satellite antenna mounted on the roof. And no, it was not a camper, it had police inside it. When you consider the amount of police vehicles involved....each anpr vehicle had others attending it...I noted a dozen cars, vans and motorcycles...and that was just on one route with a few side roads....there are 4 other roads off that junction...
To be fair about it, they are not targeting lawful drivers...indeed, they cannot.
They also work with VOSA, DVLA, The Benefits Agency and HMRC.
So: if you're running-on-red....or working-and-claiming.....or working as a courier on ordinary insurance.....

So -is about illegal activity any more - or tax evasion enforcement . Insured /MOT/Road legal ,and safe ,but no tax -siezed .There's various programes on TV just now about the various agencies out looking for tax evadours - and come to think of it - my son got married two years ago to American lass - cost him about £500 for a Vusa , now two years on - leave to remain will cost them about £800 - and then ,there's the "British " test - a bit stupid since Bush and our illustrious leaders have formed a semi coalition .Actualy - my UK born kids tried it - one got 45% ,another 56% - the pass is 75% - so ,although born in the UK -they'd be chucked out if they took the test .Test Q- how many under xx yaers in the UK-perhaps we should ask Gordo AND deport him to Kirkaldy if he gets less than 50% .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 23:52 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
SafesSpeedv2 wrote:
Received this from Hertfordshire County Council...
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
Dear Claire Armstrong,
Reference number: FOI/ENV/03/10/1930
On 9th March 2010 we received the following request for information from you:
Safespeedv2 wrote:
“Under the FOI act I wish to know all the technical information about the secondary units that are installed near a Gatso camera unit .
I would like to know :
Do all your active Gatso camera's have them installed ?
How many of these secondary 'flash' units are active?
To what purpose do they serve?
Why have they been necessary ?
What failing does it serve to the Gatso unit or other?
Since they have a small remote aerial who does this report to and what does it report?
Does the aerial link back to the Gatso unit?

If for another purpose, as well, or otherwise, please state what that purpose is ?
If they are as a slave flash then :
Can you explain why this is slave is required?
1 - Is it to aid illumination of non-retro-reflective plates?
2 - Is it to aid illumination of the more distance graduation marks? (which I thought are semi-retro-reflective anyway)
3 - Is it to aid illumination of other parts of the vehicle - to help determine the position of the vehicle relative to those graduation marks?

To what benefit is the reason the units exist in the first place ?
Please source all references for facts and information supplied where you can.”

Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
On 12th March 2010 we contacted you for clarification on what was meant by “What failing does it serve to the Gatso unit or other?” On the same day you clarified:

“OK perhaps better phrased :
What function does the 2nd 'pole' unit have ?
What relationship if any does the 2nd pole have to the main Gatso Camera unit ?
and
Full technical data sheets on both units - the Gatso cameras and the 2nd Pole unit?
The full service and all required maintenance of both units ?”

Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
Your request for information has been considered under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. I can confirm that Hertfordshire County Council does hold some of the information you have requested and can respond as follows:

SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
- Do all your active Gatso camera's have them installed?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
Not all Gatso cameras in the county have the secondary unit at the moment as we are installing them over a number of years. By the end of 2010/11 we anticipate that all Gatso cameras will be converted to digital technology.

- How many of these secondary 'flash' units are active?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
The secondary flash units are only active when an offence is recorded.

- To what purpose do they serve?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
The secondary flash unit provides further illumination to allow the safety camera to operate at night as the aperture on the digital camera requires more light.

- Why have they been necessary?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
The Safety Camera Partnership is undertaking an upgrade of all its static housings to enable them to use digital technology as the current "wet film" technology is being phased out by the manufacturers.

- What failing does it serve to the Gatso unit or other?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
See response below to clarified questions.

- Since they have a small remote aerial who does this report to and what does it report?
- Does the aerial link back to the Gatso unit?
- If for another purpose, as well, or otherwise, please state what that purpose is ?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
There is no aerial on these flash units.

- If they are as a slave flash then:
Can you explain why this is slave is required?
1 - Is it to aid illumination of non-retro-reflective plates?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
No.

2 - Is it to aid illumination of the more distance graduation marks? (which I thought are semi-retro-reflective anyway)
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
The secondary flash unit provides further illumination to allow the safety camera to operate at night as the aperture on the digital camera requires more light.

3 - Is it to aid illumination of other parts of the vehicle - to help determine the position of the vehicle relative to those graduation marks?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
No.

To what benefit is the reason the units exist in the first place?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
As stated above, the secondary flash unit provides further illumination to allow the safety camera to operate at night.

Please source all references for facts and information supplied where you can."
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
Technical information must be sought from the manufacturers, Gatso and Serco.

What function does the 2nd 'pole' unit have ?
and
What relationship if any does the 2nd pole have to the main Gatso Camera unit ?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
The secondary flash unit provides further illumination to allow the safety camera to operate at night, as the aperture on the digital camera requires more light.

Full technical data sheets on both units - the Gatso cameras and the 2nd Pole unit?
and
The full service and all required maintenance of both units ?

Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
Technical information must be sought from the manufacturers, Gatso and Serco.

Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me, quoting the reference number on this letter. To find out more about Freedom of Information, please visit http://www.hertsdirect.org/foi
If you are unhappy with the way the County Council has handled your request for information, you may complain through the County Council's complaints procedure which is available at http://www.hertsdirect.org/complaints
If you are unhappy with the outcome of the complaints procedure you are entitled to ask the Information Commissioner to investigate your complaint. You should write to: FOI/EIR Complaints Resolution, Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF.
Yours sincerely,
Information Governance Unit, Hertfordshire County Council, Telephone: 01992 555848 - Fax: 01992 588117 Email: information.governance@hertscc.gov.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Information Governance Unit supports Hertfordshire County Council's Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Records Management activity.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 00:05 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
- Since they have a small remote aerial who does this report to and what does it report?
- Does the aerial link back to the Gatso unit?
- If for another purpose, as well, or otherwise, please state what that purpose is ?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
There is no aerial on these flash units.


Claire ,in true diplomatic,and political fashion ,can I refer you to my photos on viewtopic.php?f=5&t=21832&start=0, post four ,and viewtopic.php?f=19&t=21059&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=0, post 13,
where the aerial is shown clearly ,and my reply from Warks SCP in that the aerial could be used to transmit data "to the police ".

Think I might once again ask WARKS SCP the same questions ,under FOI .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 00:42 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
botach wrote:
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
- Since they have a small remote aerial who does this report to and what does it report?
- Does the aerial link back to the Gatso unit?
- If for another purpose, as well, or otherwise, please state what that purpose is ?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
There is no aerial on these flash units.

Claire ,in true diplomatic,and political fashion ,can I refer you to my photos on viewtopic.php?f=5&t=21832&start=0, post four ,and viewtopic.php?f=19&t=21059&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=0, post 13,
where the aerial is shown clearly ,and my reply from Warks SCP in that the aerial could be used to transmit data "to the police ".
Think I might once again ask WARKS SCP the same questions ,under FOI .

Yep I am not the slightest bit surprised that they have been evasive - I am considering my response carefully.
I agree that the arial is blatantly obvious.
I think they need to reply more technically than say go talk to manufacture - I will do anyway too of course.
I can ask the WARKS SCP too of course :) - or send them to me and I'll copy it to them and then we can collate over a few - I have already asked this to Manchester ... I am tempted to select as many Partnerships contacts as possible and ask them all the same question. be interesting to see whether they all know as much as each other - or are prepared to admit a collection of variable facts ! :)

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 00:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Based on the reply to my questions ,and on what has been put on here , and my pictures ,have sent a FOI request to Warks CC ,CC my County Councillor asking

"Can you please state the purpose of these additional units .
Can you please state the purpose of the aerial ,and state whether it is a receive /transmit or both way system aerial .Please also state whether this aerial transmits during any emanation of radar pulses from the Gatso unit and to where, either during emanation of Gatso radar or at any other time . ( I also sent them a photo of one additional unit ,showing aerial ,so they could not deny it ,and certainly my CC is technically aware to know that it's an RF device )

I did ask this question informally to get two replies -

"This is just an additional flash and not a new camera. It's equipment which
assists the camera."& "It probably transmits data to the police " ,WHEN asked about the aerial ."

So hornets been released into the CC honey pot - wonder if any SCP people will get stung -

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 01:30 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
The secondary flash units are only active when an offence is recorded.

So not full time ANPR then.

1 - Is it to aid illumination of non-retro-reflective plates?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
No.

OK

2 - Is it to aid illumination of the more distance graduation marks? (which I thought are semi-retro-reflective anyway)
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
The secondary flash unit provides further illumination to allow the safety camera to operate at night as the aperture on the digital camera requires more light.

What part of that question did they answer? :roll:
Why would an "aperture" need more light? :scratchchin: Is the aperture smaller (bigger f-number) ?
Getting to the point: exactly how would the cameras not function properly without the slave flash? It can't be due to 1 or 3!

3 - Is it to aid illumination of other parts of the vehicle - to help determine the position of the vehicle relative to those graduation marks?
Hertfordshire County Council wrote:
No.

To this one GS said "yes" :D

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 01:40 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Steve - trying to remember the Latin Phrase about not letting the illigitimi get to you , as GS seems to be doing - IMHO-best way of revenge -( and it's best served cold) is to ignore him , he seems to survive on NEGATIVE energy .( Like as found on a sewerage farm)

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 15:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
I have been looking at these devices quite closely.
They are marked "GATSO" on the rear of the additional unit.
The speed camera itself has a flash unit.
The extra unit may well be to illuminate the road so that the camera unit can be used to permanently view the area, since the internal flash unit will only "fire" on excess speed.
Don't forget, the digital speed cameras can also be used as static video cameras.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.089s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]