Kent News =
HereKent News wrote:
Partnership spokeswoman Katherine Barrett said: "By adopting a cartoon strip approach it trivialises the issue of speeding and road safety.
That sounds very much like she is trivialising the Animation Industry ... how utterly stupid. It is an incredible medium that is so flexible that it is used throughout society, business and governments.
Many government public info films were all animation or has she forgotten that ?
Kent News wrote:
"This simplistic approach to road safety ignores the fact speeding is a major contributor to accidents and personal injuries and deaths on the roads of Kent and Medway. "The advert also portrays the driver as an innocent party, when in fact he has broken the law by driving too fast."
Innocent until proven guilty is what totally forgotten ?
There are errors of equipment and mistakes made and then assurances to confirm certification is all in order of course.
Kent News wrote:
Mr Barrett said some 30,000 speeding tickets were issued to motorists across Kent and Medway in 2009, but despite this drivers are slowing down. The Partnership said it has seen a 63 per cent reduction in the number of people killed or seriously injured across its yellow fixed safety camera sites and safety camera van sites since they were introduced.
That will be the 63% then that all own a Sat Navs then ...
And more seriously - since when has 'just' slowing down made a road safer? What about all those that use a different route, or have moved away, or changed job and travel another route and so on ...
Kent News wrote:
Ms Barrett added: "That's 324 casualties that have been prevented. This is excellent news, but irresponsible adverts like this one only serve to undermine our attempts to encourage motorists that excessive speed is a killer."
Oh that's a great FOI there then ... lets see how they can prove that ...
Kent News wrote:
"We have had positive feedback from some readers regarding our cartoon and our campaign has been running since mid December, 2009. "We are in the process of reviewing our marketing and will take in to account the views which some members of the public have expressed. We apologise for any offence caused."
Well it doesn't sound like they have to 'pull it', perhaps at most just slightly re-word it - still they do say there is no bad publicity.