davicon wrote:
I'm a little dubious about the sat nav thing is is it proven that it reads a true speed?
...But regards to speed Mole I'm not afraid, I'm quite confident now, I've been driving a year and bit now but it took me a while before I ventured out of my local 30 mile comfort zone and started to tackle what's out there on the big road, this is why I refer to myself a inexperienced driver. what does scare me about speed is getting caught over the limit and losing my license when I try so hard to be safe and follow the limit. not that I'm looking to ever tot up any I hope! I'm very pro speed limit, i believe that it is there for a reason especially 30 and I'm not looking try and be sneaky, speeding around trying to beat speed traps.
In my experience, generally better than a car speedo. On pretty much every car I've ever put a sat-nav into (and any sat-nav at that!) has had the sat-nav reading a couple of MPH less than the speedo. You CAn sool sat-navs - particularly on tight bends or roundabouts, but when you're heading in a reasonably straight line on the motorway, they're pretty good. Most of them have some sort of "velocity averaging" software which only updates itself every second, or few seconds, so for that reason, constant speed in a straight line is the best time to check. Remember that most camera partnerships won't dish out points until you reach 10% + 2MPH, so if you use your speedo rather than the sat nav and you've not done aything to the car to make the speedo inaccurate (like silly wheels & tyres), you're highly unlikely to be prosecuted.
davicon wrote:
Something i do find very annoying is when drivers behind immediately overtaking you when they can clearly see you need to over take the vehicle in front so you don't have to break, it happened to me so many times on my last journey.
I'm not sure about this. If you look at it from their point of view. I guess one of them might equally be heard saying "...something I do find very annoying is when drivers "expect" me to let them out to overtake a slower vehicle when I have right of way"! Now I don't want to take either side, in particular here, but I think it probably needs compromise on both sides. I think that technically, the person changing lanes is in a situation where they have to "give way" to someone already in the lane they want to move into. On the other hand, if people DON'T let the driver in the lane to their left out, the obvious answer is for that driver to then stay in the outside lane longer than they need to - because once there, THEY have "right of way". That, of course, can lead to frustration if you want to stick to the limit and they don't. It all goes downhill from there...
When I first started using motorways, I was quite surprised at just how far one has to look ahead and plan. Obviously, in the extreme case, if you only start looking for a space in the outside lane to pull into when you're a couple of car-lengths behind the truck in Lane 2, you're more than likely going to have someone in Lane 3 wanting the same space as you! At the other extreme, if you can see the trucks on the horizon and get into Lane 3 a mile before you need to, and then sit at 70, that's likely to cause extreme frustration (and thus, danger) too. It's finding the happy medium that's the trick! I don't mean to sound "preachy" here. I have to admit that I'm very lucky in that most of my motorway driving takes place in the far North of England and Southern Scotland where the traffic is much lighter and motorways can still be usd as they were designed (i.e. most traffic in Lanes 1 & 2 with Lane 3 as the overtaking lane). That's a luxury that we no longer have on most of the motorway network, most of the time!
Also, being prepared to adjust your speed slightly to match (or at least get closer to) the cars in the outside lane can help considerably. Now, of course, I'm NOT inciting you to break the speed limit - you have every right not to, but I'm sure you can see that the smaller the speed differential, the easier it is to slot into gaps. If I'm pootling along in no particular hurry, trying to conserve fuel (I agree it's darned expensive!) and want to overtake something, I do generally accelerate whilst using the outside lane, transiently, and then settle down again to whatever I was doing when I'm back in Lane 2. I acknowledge that I put my licence at a very small risk whilst doing so, but it's just the most efficient, safe and courteous way of doing it (in my view)! It's a sad state of affairs when you risk getting a few points for those reasons but welcome to motoring in 21st century UK!

Our local Scamera partnership advises motorists to be "safe speed ambassadors" (or at least it used to)! By this they mean "rolling roadblocks". They (mistakenly, in my view) believe that encouraging motorists to become "limit limpets" will make things safer. Now where I live, we have lots of winding, hilly single carriageway A roads that provide few overtaking opportunities, and I've seen the lunatic overtaking manoeuvres born out of sheer frustration that result from this. Are the lunatic overtakers right to do so? Of course not! But I remain to be convinced that the encoragement of the "limit limpet" in any way makes things safer!