Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed May 13, 2026 13:23

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 09:57 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Quote:
Londoners On Speed

(22 Mar 05)

Research commissioned by Mayor of London Ken Livingstone and conducted by MORI suggests that Londoners are in favour of 20mph speed limits on the city's residential streets, and consider speed cameras to be one of the more preferable ways of persuading people to drive more slowly.

As with all polls, it's worth knowing some of the background. In this case, speed limits and enforcement methods were the subjects of two questions in a much larger survey, and the statistics are based on the replies of 1000 residents.

On the first topic, Londoners were asked: "The current maximum speed limit in many areas such as residential streets and outside schools is 30mph. For each of the following, can you tell me to what extent do you support or oppose the introduction of a 20mph speed limit?" In the case of residential streets, there was significant acceptance, with 43% strongly supporting and 17% tending to support such as introduction.

For lower limits outside schools, the strong support option was very much more popular, reaching 70%. Only 6% remained strongly opposed to the idea.

The next question was this: "Which one of the following measures, if any, would you prefer for reducing traffic speed?" The options were speed bumps, chicanes and speed cameras, and while chicanes were definitely the third option there was more or less equal support for the other two - especially in the case of roads outside schools, where both received 36% support.

Transport for London's road safety programme budget includes £7 million for the introduction of 20mph limits on residential roads in both 2004/2005 and 2005/2006.




I expect to see this on T2K any time now.

1000 must be 0.02% of the population of London.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 10:55 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
As far as I can discover, the population of London in 2001 was 7.1 million, thus the survey is of approx 0.014% of the populace.

Or to put it another way, each person they asked represents over 7000 they didn't!

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 13:34 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
JT wrote:
As far as I can discover, the population of London in 2001 was 7.1 million, thus the survey is of approx 0.014% of the populace.


I stand corrected!

I bet you never get the sample size when it is used by Uncle Ken.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 21:24 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso1: "There are lies, damned lies and statistics". Benjamin Disraeli.


:? "98% of statistics are made up on the spot." Vic Reeves


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.034s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]