Photos here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -cold.htmlTech stuff quoted from here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/new ... meras.htmlarticle wrote:
and at lower temperatures vital timing circuitry is slowed inside the unit.
Speaking as a seasoned electronic design engineer: I find it inconceivable that anyone could design a frequency reference that significantly slows at -5C (significant means more than 1%) into such a critical piece of equipment (evidence capture). For example, crystal oscillators usually have a drift of up to 100ppm over the operating temperature range, which is 0.01% (or 1% of 1%). That's certainly nowhere near the claimed 37% error.
Nothing has been said about any error from the radar sensor.
This does beg the question of whether the counter for the radar pulses is also driving/being driven from the timer for the photo delays; I suspect not. Again I would find it inconceivable that anyone would do such a silly short cut.
article wrote:
He added: "If it's so cold the capacitor on the circuit can't hold its charge or is damaged the flash will not go off in time.
So why would it go off later? Does he know how a flash trigger works? Would the displayed time delay not be wrong too?
What about the radar sensor; nothing would have been triggered unless that was in error too.I don't buy it, and he's obviously clutching at straws! If anything, I think it much more likely his speedo was affected by the cold weather.