James Baggott wrote:
Speed cameras are not the best way of making killer roads safer, according to the Road Safety Foundation.
Speed cameras not the best way to cut deaths
Posted 30th Jun 2010 by James Baggott
Filed under: Safety, News
The pressure group has analysed the dangerous roads across the UK that have seen a dramatic reduction in the number of serious injuries and deaths – and it found speed cameras weren't the solution.
The most improved road – the A40 between Llandovery and Camarthen in Wales – slashed the number of serious accidents by a whopping 74 per cent and it didn't use any cameras to do it.
"Road improvements and resurfacing are far more cost effective at reducing road deaths than speed cameras," said a spokeswoman for the Foundation.
"Speed cameras can only be placed where there has been a consistent problem but they cost a lot more than other means of making roads safer."
The A40 improvements included traffic management, spiral road markings, resurfacing with anti-skid toppings, improved junctions and drainage, and adding village gateways.
With these improvements in place, the number of deaths and serious injuries were cut from 27 between 2003-05 to just seven between 2006-08.
These findings from the Road Safety Foundation added to recent news that the coalition government will be ending funding for speed cameras, will come as welcome news for motorists who for years have said speed cameras don't work at reducing accidents.
Dr Joanne Hill, director of the Road Safety Foundation, added: "As the road budget becomes tighter, emphasis must be on saving lives with less.
"There are practical examples of how, with attention to detail, some authorities are slashing the toll of death and serious injury on high risk stretches by as much as three-quarters.
"Simple, relatively inexpensive engineering measures, such as improvements to signing and lining, resurfacing and the layout of signals at junctions, are paying dividends and are affordable particularly when done as part of well planned routine maintenance."
Vote:
Out of the following, what's the best way to cut deaths on killer roads?
1) More speed cameras
2) Better signing and lining
3) Better signals at junctions
4) Resurfacing the roads
Their vote is hardly fair sensible or intelligent - how can anyone possible judge how a specific road can be improved ! What non-sense - are they assuming that people will check the camera box, as they opt out of things that they know nothing about ?
Some roads only have a centre line, so better signals is hardly appropriate ! Goes to show how little is understood abut this subject, and how seriously they have taken this subject sadly.
I am delighted to see articles like this have begun however, and encouraged that people are looking at alternatives (finally) as maybe we can slowly obtain less KSI on the roads and make them finally safer.

Road Safety Foundation
here and
Dangerous Roads HereEuroRAP report
here and although I see that they have only been carrying out their study over only the last nine years I found this (same webpage) encouraging :
EuroRAP wrote:
The latest research shows that a 43km stretch of single carriageway on the A40 between Carmarthen and Llandovery is Britain's most improved road. The previous level of 54 fatal and serious collisions have been cut by more than 80 per cent to ten, by introducing measures such as resurfacing and improvements to the design and layout of junctions. A further nine roads are rated among the most improved where, typically, resurfacing, changes to junction layout, better signing and white lines are bringing about more than 50 per cent reductions in fatal and serious accidents.
Quote why we 'need' any 'Euro' study when we surely can provide our own quite adequately I find questionable at least! Seems like paying for something twice as well as being dictated to from afar...