Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 20:17

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 13:24 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
El Reg wrote:

Dumb cars cost lives, says chip firm

TECHNOLOGY that could make driving safer and more eco-friendly is being held back because of a lack of political will, according to one of the leading manufacturers of vehicle chips. [ :roll: ]

Steve Wainwright, Freescale general manager for Europe, said technologies such as airbags and anti-lock braking had already helped cut road deaths in Britain from around 8,000 in 1970 to 2,500 in 2009.

That was a great achievement, considering that the number of cars soared over the same period, but it means that on average about 50 people a week are still being killed.

"I read last week that 339 UK soldiers there have been killed in Afghanistan since 2001, which is obviously a tragedy. But in the same period there has been around 20,000 deaths on the road in the UK. It's a challenge to us all but it seems to be something we think we must live with."

The take-up of options on new cars has shown that buyers are more interested in features such as leather seats and alloy wheels that in safety and ecology. This means the market can not be relied upon to drive the change.

Measures like car-to-car communication and radar could reduce vehicle collisions, especially if they were operating within an intelligent transport system (ITS) that could warn of dangers ahead.

The benefits of an ITS extended far beyond safety. It could help you find a parking space, or avoid traffic jams, road works, or poor driving surfaces.

But it could also be used to enforce eco-friendly driving, which would not be universally welcomed. It has been estimated that up to 19 per cent of fuel could be saved simply by taking more efficient routes, and so-called 'eco-driving' to minimise consumption could save an average 11.7 per cent.

Wainwright told the Future World Symposium in London that an ITS will come only when there is the political will to cut road deaths. "The squabble over who is to pay for it will continue unless there is pressure from some outside agency. I understand the social problem. Do we want to be able to drive completely irresponsibly and waste resources? It seems that we do." ยต

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 22:00 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
"...completely irresponsibly..." eh?

He's no better than the rest of them! By and large, most people drive (I feel) pretty well, most of the time. Yes there are further technological advances to be had, but they will come at a price (and I don't just mean money)! We need to think very hard, s a society, whether we really want what he's offering, I reckon!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 08:12 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
As one of the commentators says: dumb drivers cost a lot more lives than dumb cars.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 09:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Quote:
It has been estimated that up to 19 per cent of fuel could be saved simply by taking more efficient routes,


more Efficient for whome?

A route that uses 19% less fuel but takes rather longer would not be an improvenment in many peoples eyes!

(It would be interstign to do a study on what peoples "tolerance" to these variables would actually be though)

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:31 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
Of course he would say things like that - he's trying to sell chips.

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 18:37 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Pete317 wrote:
Of course he would say things like that - he's trying to sell chips.


Now I get a bit worried about chips in cars ( or so one firm would have me believe) -they tend to turn into crack :wink:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 22:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 17:37
Posts: 702
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Pete317 wrote:
Of course he would say things like that - he's trying to sell chips.


Agreed. Take no notice of the fellow. He's got a vested interest so his views are largely invalid.

The misuse of technology - allied to a reduction in the ability of human beings to function decently from their own resouces - will be our downfall: and that's the way we're heading, I'm afraid.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 22:44 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
TripleS wrote:
Pete317 wrote:
Of course he would say things like that - he's trying to sell chips.


Agreed. Take no notice of the fellow. He's got a vested interest so his views are largely invalid.

The misuse of technology - allied to a reduction in the ability of human beings to function decently from their own resouces - will be our downfall: and that's the way we're heading, I'm afraid.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


But, DAVE , like me - are we bothered - by the time they get all this conforming technology into cars ,which means we'll be able to drive into our dotage ( something they don't want) -we'll be that GAGA ,( or down under ) , we don't care .

Me - I don't worry about chips on my screen - the locals have gotten past that - they now throw mushy peas /beans or curry sauce . :D :wink: ( And in my old age ,I wish they'd throw a few beef steaks as well)

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 23:33 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 11:19
Posts: 1795
There was something in the paper today about some electro magnetic storms that could wipe out communication and all sorts. Also there is already a problem with modern cars driving by certain areas with certain equipment as it is.

Personally I'd have just shown the guy the footage of volvo's intelligent emergency braking system... I suspect he'd have shut up!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 01:21 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Steve Winwright wrote:
technologies such as airbags and anti-lock braking had already helped cut road deaths in Britain from around 8,000 in 1970 to 2,500 in 2009.

Now just a cotton picking minute!!!!

I thought Speed Cameras had saved all those lives???? :shock: :bunker:

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 15:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 19:11
Posts: 172
Location: Southampton
Most of the inefficient routes are caused by so called traffic management, which seem to be engineered to cause as much delay as possible. As soon as I see a sign announcing "Hampshire Road Improvement", it normally means another place for holdups.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.012s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]