dcbwhaley wrote:
Not you but ...
dcbwhaley previously wrote:
... all ...
Prejudged?
dcbwhaley wrote:
Pete has decided that the report is clutching at straws.
Johnny has already decided which road the experiment used.
Roaduser is relying on anecdotal evidence.
Nigel is generalising from a single instance.
Peter tells us that the author has already made up his mind.
And, as usual, I am not quite clear what point Botach is making.
Roaduser did not give any judgement on the paper
Nigel did not give any judgement on the paper
jomukuk did not give any judgement on the paper
Dusty jested "(Seriously...." [you suffered a SOH failure there Dave]
teabelly rightly pointed out a confounding factor (as I did) and did not give any judgement on the paper
(Pete317 has spoken for himself)
PeterE rightly pointed out the aims of the research according to the journalist (to convince us to give up cars) - judgement here is quite fair.
JTB gave possible explanations to a question he posed - you
very conveniently quoted there Dave.
You admitted to not understanding botach, so how you were ably to pass judgement with his post I don't know!
So much for "all". Your assessment is not withstanding scrutiny. Perhaps you misjudged others, just as you had evidently done with me?
so what are you trying to achieve !!! 